<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Always the bridesmaid, never the bride&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.principiadiscordia.com/blog/cain/always-the-bridesmaid-never-the-bride/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.principiadiscordia.com/blog/cain/always-the-bridesmaid-never-the-bride/</link>
	<description>Lulz is the Law, Lulz under Lol</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cain</title>
		<link>http://www.principiadiscordia.com/blog/cain/always-the-bridesmaid-never-the-bride/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Cain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.principiadiscordia.com/blog/?p=319#comment-558</guid>
		<description>I would suggest feudalism is probably more conceptually sound and defined than a hollow state.  I would say what defined feudalism was firstly the class hierarchy, which still exists if more informally, but also the overlapping nature of loyalty within the system.  A feudal lord could be quite easily sworn to more than one king, for example.  So the idea of "France" as a single country, for example, was a lot less solid that currently exists. 

I think it could go that way, but it wont, necessarily.  I do like Hedley Bull's concept of neo-medievalism and think it has a lot of merit, but equally that social evolution and new technology will cause changes to the model, so even if its mostly analoguous to feudal societies, there may still be significant differences in general operation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest feudalism is probably more conceptually sound and defined than a hollow state.  I would say what defined feudalism was firstly the class hierarchy, which still exists if more informally, but also the overlapping nature of loyalty within the system.  A feudal lord could be quite easily sworn to more than one king, for example.  So the idea of &#8220;France&#8221; as a single country, for example, was a lot less solid that currently exists. </p>
<p>I think it could go that way, but it wont, necessarily.  I do like Hedley Bull&#8217;s concept of neo-medievalism and think it has a lot of merit, but equally that social evolution and new technology will cause changes to the model, so even if its mostly analoguous to feudal societies, there may still be significant differences in general operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xooxe</title>
		<link>http://www.principiadiscordia.com/blog/cain/always-the-bridesmaid-never-the-bride/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>Xooxe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.principiadiscordia.com/blog/?p=319#comment-557</guid>
		<description>Great stuff Cain. Interesting overview, and I'm checking out that Global Guerrillas site too.

Is the idea of a hollow state similar to feudalism, just propped up with an illusory official government?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff Cain. Interesting overview, and I&#8217;m checking out that Global Guerrillas site too.</p>
<p>Is the idea of a hollow state similar to feudalism, just propped up with an illusory official government?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
