I said CAN spread viruses. To clarify, 000 hit me with something designed to overload my CPU, thus affecting voltage, on a system that already has cooling issues.
Being exposed to something potentially physically damaging to my PC, as a result of being here, is not acceptable.
But it doesn't spread a virus, does it? No, you used that word because it plays into the poor little persecuted Daruko theme that runs through most of your self-pitying nonsense. Never mind its not true, and implicitly accusing 000 of something he would not do, you just want to cause a panic and feel all self-righteous.
It's unethical, and I'm confident it's illegal. Opinions may vary on this, but in a court of law (which most likely would never happen from me) I think CRASHING PC's over the internet would be a punishable offense.
Cry me a river. If you're not going to press charges, why bring it up? So you can try and guilt 000 and others into supporting you? So you can savour having some sort of power over them, no matter how slight?
Regardless, it's a high price to pay, just to participate in a larger online community.
Yes, and everyone must pay the price. Oh, wait, didn't 000 give you that link because you were being a dick? Maybe if you hadn't of been a dick, you wouldn't have "paid that price".
As an aside, I was one of the first test subjects of this browser bomb, so I find your grounds to complaint to be pretty baseless.
I didn't claim you deleted my posts. I suspected someone may have. I found the post on the other acct, and stated everything I knew, every step of the way.
Don't lie so much Daruko. Here is a direct quote:
Yep... mod cheating. Someone starts exposing, and you're RIGHT on it. BURY IT QUICK!
You guys never cease to amaze me.
If TGRR now gets to name MY thread, then you can suck a dick. MOD ABUSE will win the day, and subvert the one who DARES to strike back at Roger.
You have no right to delete my threads Cain.
Continue on this course, and you're just adding to the shitstain that the AA banning thread already plainly displays for those who have eyes to see. The only reason that thread isn't ENTIRELY a shitstain is that ECH seems to have principles.
You accused me of deleting your threads and having no principles with no grounds. And even now, you are lying about that accusation. Why should we trust anything you say without independent verification?
"Everyone" took me a while to see how careful one should be with this word. At any point I've made broad statements like this, I've been directing it at particular people. Now I just word it better. Same case here. A few people.
But you never name those people. Instead, you like to lie the blame at the feet of the community, lumping in everyone with your statements. Again, fitting in with your persecution theme.
The only issue here is abuse of mod powers, and I don't think Browser Bombs should be aloud. Now if imagebombing is disallowed, STATE THE FUCKING RULE, and apply it EQUALLY to the community as a whole, not just if you're a mod, and someone you know has a tiff with someone you don't like.
A temp ban and then asking the other mods for their advice in the case of unsure rule application is abuse of powers? How so? If ECH or the other mods disagreed, it would be overturned. Sure, temp-banning wouldn't be my first choice in such a situation, but its hardly like he is leaving you without any sort of recourse at all, or is threatening to ban you for no reason whatsoever.
You also could have sent such a PM to ECH and settled the situation without dragging the entire forum into your personal psychodrama.
But I forgot, this is all about YOU being PERSECUTED by the EVIL MODS! And therefore, everyone has to see it happening. You don't give a shit about abuse of power whatsoever. You care about what props you can use to make yourself look like a victim. Just like you were perfectly fine with abusing your powers of deleting threads. Do I really have to remind you of that
abuse of power?
But no such rule exist, and whether Nigel likes it or not, I don't pay attention to her personal problems, and before this occurence, haven't considered whether one of my posts could affect an epileptic, let alone whether this is my problem or not. It doesn't even have to be a rule. If she had approached me in any other way that she did, I would have apologized and been careful with flashing images in future. In fact, I AM more careful now with flashy images. Now I've thought about it. I just don't care about Nigel's feelings anymore than she does mine.
Shorter Daruko: I'm going to continue to be a dick towards Nigel and do stuff to wind her up (even though she's going through a mega-rough patch in her life), because she hurt my feelings. And that is unacceptable.
CRASHING PCs should not be condoned period.
Yes it should. Because its hilarious.
My position should be pretty clear here. I do much more lurking here, and much less posting these days. I didn't like finding a ban threat in my box today, and I don't feel like dragging this on. I have better things to do than deal with this kind of situation.
Well given your sterling contributions up until now, I am sure you will be sorely missed. When we need another person who has rampant persecution complexes, I will keep you in mind.