Author Topic: Dysgenics: Our Future.  (Read 6551 times)

Triple Zero

  • DO NOT ABUSE EXCEPT FOR URGENT FURNITURE MOVING EMERGENCIES
  • One-Armed Jizz Moppers
  • Deserved It
  • **
  • Posts: 80835
  • Horrible and Sexy Queen of Cheese
    • View Profile
    • Random BIP
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #15 on: January 05, 2010, 03:38:42 pm »
that's right, bunch of puny sissy "urban" wannabees.
Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.

Reginald Ret

  • 'Miserable Atrocianthrope'
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 38806
  • Interweb Gloryhole QC Inspector #23
    • View Profile
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #16 on: January 05, 2010, 06:40:21 pm »
what will you do when the highwaymen get organised huh?
or when a foreign power decides to invade?
NOTHING, THATS WHAT!
because you have no city rights you have no city wall or militia to defend your rights.
you are sooooo fucked.




PS
me too btw, my town was built after the crown stopped selling city rights.
Lord Byron: "Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves."

Nigel saying the wisest words ever uttered: "It's just a suffix."

"The worst forum ever" "The most mediocre forum on the internet" "The dumbest forum on the internet" "The most retarded forum on the internet" "The lamest forum on the internet" "The coolest forum on the internet"

Jasper

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 67367
  • Pull-Start Enema Wasteland
    • View Profile
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #17 on: January 06, 2010, 02:58:31 am »
What would be the point of a wall?  86% of our men have fired guns, and 51% of women have too.  You have to cross the Atlantic to get to us, and we have the mightiest navy and airforce the world has ever seen.

Fuck your walls.


Edited to include women.

Requia ☣

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 53479
  • Delicate and pretty shark of impending doom.
    • View Profile
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #18 on: January 08, 2010, 08:04:13 pm »
Our navy is complete crap and our airforce pilots can't even land UAVs reliably.

Also, Salt Lake has (had?) a wall.
Inflatable dolls are not recognized flotation devices.

Jasper

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 67367
  • Pull-Start Enema Wasteland
    • View Profile
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #19 on: January 09, 2010, 08:51:36 am »
Our navy is complete crap and our airforce pilots can't even land UAVs reliably.

The navy:  Look at this utter bullshit.  Obviously not useful in wars.


P3nT4gR4m

  • Official SSOOKN Pariah
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 71976
  • I'm an artist now - isn't that depressing?
    • View Profile
    • fuck you
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #20 on: January 09, 2010, 11:17:01 am »
Damn skippy! Look at those planes in the middle - cowering in fear with their wings over their eyes.
Not actually a meat product.
Ass-Kicking & Foot-Stomping Ancient Master of SHIT FUCK FUCK FUCK
Awful and Bent Behemothic Results of Last Night's Painful Squat.
High Altitude Haggis-Filled Sex Bucket From Beyond Time and Space.
Internet Monkey Person of Filthy and Immoral Pygmy-Porn Wart Contagion
Octomom Auxillary Heat Exchanger Repairman
walking the fine line line between genius and batshit fucking crazy

"computation is a pattern in the spacetime arrangement of particles, and it’s not the particles but the pattern that really matters! Matter doesn’t matter." -- Max Tegmark

The Johnny

  • did nots
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 41296
    • View Profile
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #21 on: January 09, 2010, 04:11:09 pm »

One wrong U-turn and they all go in the drink.

Please.

Epimetheus

  • Young, dumb, and stupid.
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 16348
    • View Profile
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #22 on: January 10, 2010, 05:24:55 am »
Interesting read, JohNyx. I'm wondering how you got from "The government propagandizes about abstinence" and "The abstinence propaganda doesn't work" to "The government doesn't want actually abstinence happening"? It doesn't seem to logically follow...
(those aren't quotes from your writing but i was paraphrasing)
POST-SINGULARITY POCKET ORGASM TOAD OF RIGHTEOUSNESS

The Johnny

  • did nots
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 41296
    • View Profile
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #23 on: January 10, 2010, 05:46:24 am »

Interesting read, JohNyx. I'm wondering how you got from "The government propagandizes about abstinence" and "The abstinence propaganda doesn't work" to "The government doesn't want actually abstinence happening"? It doesn't seem to logically follow...
(those aren't quotes from your writing but i was paraphrasing)

Government knows abstinence as a contraceptive method does not work, because it has statistical knkowledge of its population's tendencies. First sexual relation age is lowering each year. The government knows teenagers are not gonna stop from having sex.

Government promotes abstinence as a contraceptive method just to be in good terms with the powerful far right.

The far rights agenda is ideological, while the governments agenda is profit.

More people = more work force + more difficulty to make organized resistance = more profit.

Epimetheus

  • Young, dumb, and stupid.
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 16348
    • View Profile
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #24 on: January 10, 2010, 05:51:50 am »
More people = more work force + more difficulty to make organized resistance

Maybe I'm being stupid but how do you get that second one?
POST-SINGULARITY POCKET ORGASM TOAD OF RIGHTEOUSNESS

The Johnny

  • did nots
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 41296
    • View Profile
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #25 on: January 10, 2010, 06:14:44 am »
More people = more work force + more difficulty to make organized resistance

Maybe I'm being stupid but how do you get that second one?

The "China effect":

When you get enough people, labour becomes very cheap.

It becomes very cheap because of the "supply-demand"; as in there is a lot of supply of work force, while there isnt that much of a demand for it.

And the protection syndicates offered goes to shit, because to have any leverage stemmed from syndicates, there needs to be organization.

In 1910 there were 1,650 million people in the world, 1950 there were 2,521 million; in 2008 there were 6,707 million people.

If im not mistaken, when syndicates were at its most powerful was around 1910 (by regions it varies), while in 1950 they started to decline in their influence power over decisions, while nowadays their power is null compared to those days.

The population from 1910 to 1950 increased 152%, while from 1910 to 2008 is 406%; the more people you need to organize to make a difference, the harder it becomes.

And its even more hard to organize, when people that are uneducated, with the burden of children, because that makes them less prone to look towards the future and more for instant gratification, and sometimes refusing to strike, because that would imply not bringing food to the table of their families when they are already living paycheck to paycheck.

Epimetheus

  • Young, dumb, and stupid.
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 16348
    • View Profile
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #26 on: January 10, 2010, 06:32:08 am »
I see now. Thanks.
POST-SINGULARITY POCKET ORGASM TOAD OF RIGHTEOUSNESS

Jasper

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 67367
  • Pull-Start Enema Wasteland
    • View Profile
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #27 on: January 10, 2010, 09:06:13 am »

One wrong U-turn and they all go in the drink.

Please.

I can't find any reports of us losing Navy ships in battle for several decades.  Either its classified (not sure how you could keep a secret like that though) or what.  Still, the US Navy isn't known for its heavy casualties.

This is about the pointlessness of walls, though.  Walls do not keep airplanes, artillery, tanks, or even soldiers at bay.

So what's the big shit over walls?

Reginald Ret

  • 'Miserable Atrocianthrope'
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 38806
  • Interweb Gloryhole QC Inspector #23
    • View Profile
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #28 on: January 10, 2010, 11:13:50 am »

One wrong U-turn and they all go in the drink.

Please.

I can't find any reports of us losing Navy ships in battle for several decades.  Either its classified (not sure how you could keep a secret like that though) or what.  Still, the US Navy isn't known for its heavy casualties.

This is about the pointlessness of walls, though.  Walls do not keep airplanes, artillery, tanks, or even soldiers at bay.

So what's the big shit over walls?
It's not about walls exactly, its about the right to build a wall.
you haven't bought that right from your king, so you don't have a city.
Lord Byron: "Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves."

Nigel saying the wisest words ever uttered: "It's just a suffix."

"The worst forum ever" "The most mediocre forum on the internet" "The dumbest forum on the internet" "The most retarded forum on the internet" "The lamest forum on the internet" "The coolest forum on the internet"

MMIX

  • Доктор мом
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 16507
  • FUNEX? S, VFX. FUNEM? S, VFM
    • View Profile
Re: Dysgenics: Our Future.
« Reply #29 on: January 10, 2010, 11:43:00 am »

It's not about walls exactly, its about the right to build a wall.
you haven't bought that right from your king, so you don't have a city.

In UK all you need to be a city is a cathedral . . .
Having a wall probably means you are only a town and can join the "The Walled Towns Friendship Circle" - a cute marketing ploy started in my local walled town of Tenby. If you want to be a "city" build yourself a cathedral modern "cities" are too big to wall even if its just a notional wall to prove you have the right to do it.

@Felix Yeah, yeah, yeah we all know how big your army & navy and airforce are [yawn] You buggers just have to have the biggest of everything  :wink: but it takes the biscuit when you diss us old-fashioned types for having walls then admit to having the biggest MOAT in history - the Atlantic . . .
If the answer is Donald J Trump then it must have been a fucking stupid question.
Trump cultists; "and some, I assume, are good people"
Collusion??? ~ "If it truly was a nothingburger, there’s nothing here, why not open the kimono?”