What's the goal?
-To piss of racists? this will accomplish that, and if you piss off enough of them, they'll fight you back. So it's not something you should initiate from here.
-To fight racism? This won't accomplish that. A racist's reaction to this will be to reinforce his position. You give them an opportunity to respond with their own racist blathering - in doing so you you have increased the amount of racist noise.
a good attack doesn't come from head on - it's subtle, it comes from the side, and it meets no resistance.
In psychic kung-fu, the best stance is not to meet your attacker head on, but slightly askew. Start off by understanding the angle they’re coming from – understand their world view, the things which motivate them. Try to get inside their headspace, agree with their reality. This will help you detect flaws or contradictions in their beliefs. Ask questions which lead to more questions. When they are confused, their reality is most malleable. This is the best moment to suggest a new course of action, one that is on a slightly different angle than their previous one. Get them to imagine themselves doing what you want and it solving their confusion. Then let them go, moving along a new vector.
more notes here: http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?topic=26428.msg938995#msg938995
This is what I am trying to do with the superiority/similarity method. First you say that research agrees with what they think (whites have higher iq, even though this is not true) and then subtly smack them with the made up measures of similar culture. This circumvents their logical mind by using psychological effect to change their racism instead of normal argument.
The idea isn't to run in and say "FEEL GUILTY!" The idea is to use effects from psychology research to change the stereotype (cognitive schema) directly, instead of going through the logical route, which is compromised by the very existence of the cognitive schema (stereotype). Usually people can put up resistance to ideas if they know that the idea is going to come at them and are prepared for it, but by leading with the "accepted" research that white iq is higher, they legitimize the research in their head before they end up reading the rest of the research about similarities. So in that way, they aren't expecting the attack that will come, which they won't even perceive as an attack. IF they accept the research as maybe being true, then the damage has been done to their schema.
So in the end, I'm trying to tie in research on persuasion with research in prejudice reduction. And as for my two cents, I don't think that chimpout members at least will even perceive this as an attack, and if they do, are unlikely to trace it back to here.