Author Topic: On the recurrence of discussions  (Read 11558 times)

The Good Reverend Roger

  • Chopped Liver
  • One-Armed Jizz Moppers
  • Deserved It
  • **
  • Posts: 35635
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #75 on: June 12, 2012, 11:52:28 pm »
I know, right?  Evil is fucking everywhere.  Quick, hide your socks!

 :butthurt:
The only reason I am not famous is that the world is full of dicks just like me.

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

  • v=1/3πr2h
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 665071
  • v=1/3πr2h
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #76 on: June 12, 2012, 11:53:58 pm »
I don't think you're evil, RWHN. I think you're a shitty person with bad principles, working as a puny cog in a system which perpetuates evil on your fellow human beings, and telling yourself that you have a great mission to Save the Kids.
“I’m guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk,” Charles Wick said. “It was very complicated.”


Tiddleywomp Cockletit

  • La Mano Famosa del Infierno
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 151970
  • Interweb Horrormonkey of Love
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #77 on: June 12, 2012, 11:54:18 pm »
Nixon called, RWHN. He says he all the stains came off the walls and he wants you to come see.
Scantily-Clad Inspector of Gigantic and Unnecessary Cashews, Texas Division

The Good Reverend Roger

  • Chopped Liver
  • One-Armed Jizz Moppers
  • Deserved It
  • **
  • Posts: 35635
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #78 on: June 13, 2012, 12:02:04 am »
I don't think you're evil, RWHN. I think you're a shitty person with bad principles, working as a puny cog in a system which perpetuates evil on your fellow human beings, and telling yourself that you have a great mission to Save the Kids.

I think most people can rationalize away the rotten shit they associate themselves with.

For example, I can ignore some pretty rotten shit in the interests of keeping the lights on.
The only reason I am not famous is that the world is full of dicks just like me.

AFK

  • We all
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 73111
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #79 on: June 13, 2012, 12:17:41 am »
Now, now, you can't let up on we Bad People.  Your kids might end up in Jesus Camp!
Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

AFK

  • We all
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 73111
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #80 on: June 13, 2012, 12:20:33 am »
I'm such a Bad Person that now we have 10 guests viewing the Fucking Orange Eating Contest!  Only the Truly Bad can conjure up fell deeds of that nature.
Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

  • v=1/3πr2h
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 665071
  • v=1/3πr2h
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #81 on: June 13, 2012, 12:35:55 am »
No need for caps, you're just a regular lower-case kind of guy. As much as you'd like to believe anyone thinks otherwise.
“I’m guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk,” Charles Wick said. “It was very complicated.”


E.O.T.

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 15130
  • Let me ask the dog. Oh, whoops, he can't talk.
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #82 on: June 13, 2012, 12:52:55 am »
No need for caps, you're just a regular lower-case kind of guy. As much as you'd like to believe anyone thinks otherwise.

GEEZ!

          have you eaten since that weird breakfast we had?
"a good fight justifies any cause"

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

  • v=1/3πr2h
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 665071
  • v=1/3πr2h
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #83 on: June 13, 2012, 01:01:08 am »
No need for caps, you're just a regular lower-case kind of guy. As much as you'd like to believe anyone thinks otherwise.

GEEZ!

          have you eaten since that weird breakfast we had?

I ate a meat.
“I’m guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk,” Charles Wick said. “It was very complicated.”


E.O.T.

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 15130
  • Let me ask the dog. Oh, whoops, he can't talk.
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #84 on: June 13, 2012, 01:26:45 am »
No need for caps, you're just a regular lower-case kind of guy. As much as you'd like to believe anyone thinks otherwise.

GEEZ!

          have you eaten since that weird breakfast we had?

I ate a meat.

YEAH

          obviously. i guess i meant, other than rwhn (?)
"a good fight justifies any cause"

Just Another Alt

  • OREGON
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 66688
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #85 on: June 13, 2012, 04:31:44 am »
No need for caps, you're just a regular lower-case kind of guy. As much as you'd like to believe anyone thinks otherwise.

GEEZ!

          have you eaten since that weird breakfast we had?

I ate a meat.

YEAH

          obviously. i guess i meant, other than rwhn (?)
:lulz:
HAY GUIZE, I AM SO TOTALLY IN OREGON. ISN'T THAT FUCKING WILD?

Elder Iptuous

  • Professional Discordian and Physiognomist
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 56136
  • terribly tedious
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #86 on: June 13, 2012, 03:05:22 pm »
i'd just like to go on record saying that i agree with LMNOs post.  I may not agree with RWHN on the drug issues, but i respect him, and feel that the vitriol is unbecoming.

ON a more interesting note....
Is anyone knowledgeable on work done formally mapping common debates?

A quick google of 'debate map' gave a link to debategraph.org which is kinda neat on a cursory examination...
it seems that if there were central debate maps maintained, it would avoid rehashing points ad nauseum that have been put to rest.

Instead of starting each debate with basic premise and following well worn paths (that often lead to cul-de-sacs of stupid), you could start the conversation with a reference to the map and a claim that you offer an undocumented supporting argument to position #3721 (or whatever)
If someone brings up a point that has been covered, you simply have to point out where, and the arguments surrounding it could be seen in full at their disposal.  if they have something new to add, they can bring that up legitimately without having to trudge through the intermediate steps that simply make people upset and resistant before getting to new territory.


Tiddleywomp Cockletit

  • La Mano Famosa del Infierno
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 151970
  • Interweb Horrormonkey of Love
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #87 on: June 13, 2012, 04:00:51 pm »
i'd just like to go on record saying that i agree with LMNOs post.  I may not agree with RWHN on the drug issues, but i respect him, and feel that the vitriol is unbecoming.

Having spent the bulk of my life seeing good people dragged through legal nightmares over the controlled substance issue and seeing my kids get shoved into cop cars for such heinous acts as school tardies, I'm not concerned with what's "becoming" anymore. I don't particularly give a fuck how I look to anybody.
 
Quote
ON a more interesting note....
Is anyone knowledgeable on work done formally mapping common debates?

A quick google of 'debate map' gave a link to debategraph.org which is kinda neat on a cursory examination...
it seems that if there were central debate maps maintained, it would avoid rehashing points ad nauseum that have been put to rest.

Instead of starting each debate with basic premise and following well worn paths (that often lead to cul-de-sacs of stupid), you could start the conversation with a reference to the map and a claim that you offer an undocumented supporting argument to position #3721 (or whatever)
If someone brings up a point that has been covered, you simply have to point out where, and the arguments surrounding it could be seen in full at their disposal.  if they have something new to add, they can bring that up legitimately without having to trudge through the intermediate steps that simply make people upset and resistant before getting to new territory.

Interesting in theory, but...rules?  :lol:
Scantily-Clad Inspector of Gigantic and Unnecessary Cashews, Texas Division

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

  • v=1/3πr2h
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 665071
  • v=1/3πr2h
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #88 on: June 13, 2012, 04:04:42 pm »
i'd just like to go on record saying that i agree with LMNOs post.  I may not agree with RWHN on the drug issues, but i respect him, and feel that the vitriol is unbecoming.

ON a more interesting note....
Is anyone knowledgeable on work done formally mapping common debates?

A quick google of 'debate map' gave a link to debategraph.org which is kinda neat on a cursory examination...
it seems that if there were central debate maps maintained, it would avoid rehashing points ad nauseum that have been put to rest.

Instead of starting each debate with basic premise and following well worn paths (that often lead to cul-de-sacs of stupid), you could start the conversation with a reference to the map and a claim that you offer an undocumented supporting argument to position #3721 (or whatever)
If someone brings up a point that has been covered, you simply have to point out where, and the arguments surrounding it could be seen in full at their disposal.  if they have something new to add, they can bring that up legitimately without having to trudge through the intermediate steps that simply make people upset and resistant before getting to new territory.

"Unbecoming"?  :lulz:

As, in, such uppityness is unbecoming for a lady?

Sorry, I'll get back in the kitchen now, massah.
“I’m guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk,” Charles Wick said. “It was very complicated.”


The Good Reverend Roger

  • Chopped Liver
  • One-Armed Jizz Moppers
  • Deserved It
  • **
  • Posts: 35635
    • View Profile
Re: On the recurrence of discussions
« Reply #89 on: June 13, 2012, 04:07:42 pm »
Oh, dear.   :lulz:

I'm coverin' my head.
The only reason I am not famous is that the world is full of dicks just like me.