News:

Don't get me wrong, I greatly appreciate the fact that you're at least putting effort into sincerely arguing your points. It's an argument I've enjoyed having. It's just that your points are wrong and your reasons for thinking they're right are stupid.

Main Menu

Atucha I, II and Embalse

Started by hirley0, February 20, 2014, 12:59:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

hirley0

#1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atucha_I_Nuclear_Power_Plant

Pressurised Heavy Water Reactor (PHWR).

Reactor supplier(s)    Siemens

LOC http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_water_reactor


hirley0

#3
hạt nhân TBD



nó occure với tôi? sau khi điểm số của năm
Bắc thực thi? /? năng lượng chi phí cao
nghỉ ngơi qua có lẽ là về để occure
bằng phương tiện của :: "phổ biến vũ khí hạt nhân" ::

hirley0

#4
ad 53  STEP1 :fnord: :fnord: :fnord:

2: :fnord: :fnord: :fnord: :fnord: {ay at 12:30:49 pm

(13 short tons) per year {{ad 57

hirley0

#5
2/23> ad 77
http://www.thehistoricalarchive.com/happenings/57/the-history-of-electricity-a-timeline/




Today? it is my guess it is the Quantity of Kw that matters
NOT THE Quality {$) of Tw
got it Twit}