Quote from: Faust on May 31, 2015, 10:44:00 PMQuote from: LuciferX on May 31, 2015, 09:49:54 PM
I'm no expert, however, since when do people get life for meta-attempted murder?
It's not really meta-attempted murder he was charged for, it was Conspiracy to commit a crime, which in this case its pretty clear cut, they had back and forth records with a number of parties.
I'm afraid I exaggerated the figure as Junkenstien says, it was 3 times he attempted to arrange the hits.
I've been racking my head trying to figure out why he was keeping the bitcoin wallet details on his machine instead of some kind of disposable machine located elsewhere and all I can come up with is paranoia that his wealth would be stolen from him if someone managed to get access to said disposable machine, in short greed.
With proper risk reward balancing the worst that would have happened is he loses his fortune and has to start over, instead, he gambled his freedom to protect that fortune and lost it all.
But then no one is accusing bitcoin users of prudent investment.
I agree with your conclusion, yet it does not validate the premise. It seems unreasonable that One persons OPSEC would fail so miserably, given all the precautions taken. The lead seems contrived so I keep defaulting to thinking he just took the fall.
Then, recently, I skimmed some of DPR's posts that indicate a type of maniacal thinking, perhaps lending itself to lapses of reason, and subsequent security breach(es).
So, to summarize, I don't have a clear picture, yet.