News:

Endorsement:  I know that all of you fucking discordians are just a bunch of haters who seem to do anything you can to distance yourself from fucking anarchists which is just fine and dandy sit in your house on your computer and type inane shite all day until your fingers fall off.

Main Menu

"Stupid wingnut says something stupid" thread

Started by Cain, December 08, 2009, 09:34:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cain

Welcome to America's Shittiest Website, National Review Online.

That place actually used to be considered intellectual (well, intellectual by the standards of American conservatism, which as I understand it, means referring to your opponents as "faggots") before Jonah Goldberg, K-Lo and the current crop of lobotomised bottom-feeders took over.

Cain

Reading the comments at Townhall is doing my head in:

QuoteWhat we need in the White House is a Christian Taliban, an enforcer to guide the nation gently into the Way, to see the Light. Gently, lovingly. Or else!

I'm pretty sure this is a covert troll, but, then again, Clownhall comments section....

QuoteWho said he wouldn't want one of his daughters "burdened with the MISTAKE of a baby"?
Perhaps, barry, believes that Mary, unwed at the time of her (immaculate) conception, was simply 'burdened with a mistake of a baby'.
A radical Muslim could 'pretend' to be a convert to Christianity because lying is promoted by the Koran when necessary to achieve radical Islamic goals. BUT, it would be impossible for a radical Muslim to believe and acknowledge JESUS as a Savior or the Son of GOD.
barry hides well behind words, but the slip of his Muslim soul is there to see and hear if Americans open their blind eyes and unplug their deaf ears.

LOVE JEBUS HARDER OR YOUR A MOOSLIM

QuoteIf BO is a President it is certainly not of the America our fathers formed.

His idle is Communism.
His religion is Muslim.
Else explain how 3 baby watchers went looking and found a really nice kid to give gifts to.
Muslims know Jesus but refuse to accept that he is the son of God.

They mask their religion as peaceful yet since Abraham sent them off into the wilderness they have been anything but peaceful.

BO is just that which he appears to be - a Muslim.

His idle?

QuoteObama has no respect for the Christian religion. Obama is a muslim - he is a muslim - he said he was a muslim - what more does people need. He is not only a muslim but he is a racist - look at his behavior towards European countries - look at his behavior towards the Queen and the lack of respect he showed - look at the lack of respect he showed towards the white policeman. He is arrogant. I don't see the European leadership falling over themselves to be standing near him - except for Gordon Brown who apparantly is a fool. Watch what he does not what he says - he is so bull of BS - he likes to here himself talk - his actions are always different then his words.

I think this person thinks Obama might be a Muslim.  I'm not certain, though.

QuoteWe know where Jesus was born - perhaps the date is wrong but we do know he was born he Bethlehem but where was Obama born and why does he hide his birth certificate.
#

Well, we know where Jesus and the liberal-Roman media say where he was born....

QuoteHe's a Muslim...everyone except my husbands family know and believe that. My husbands aunt nearly screamed at me, "He is a Christian". I asked her how she knew that and she replied, "because he's told us." Point made!!!

Nothing says "I'm a Muslim" like saying "I'm a Christian".

QuoteCorporate Wealth Is EARNED
The usurper's message is that we all owe our earned incomes to the non contributors and the indolent. His "religion" apparently doesn't include a diety, but rather devilish theft. Affirmative action (other people's money) took him for a ride to the top. I will never believe he is an intelligent man. I see him as a mafia type thug who wants to ride the wave of richness at the expense of the taxpayers. As we go into the NEW YEAR my wish will be for his demise.

lol from the first four words onwards

QuoteJMO51 wrong, our Nation was founded on
the concept of God. Our founding fathers made that clear and it has been Americas focus since the USA began. Thanks to the non religious minorities imposing their standards our Chritianity no longer can be practiced freely!
Amen

And then the above poster was shoved in a van by Obama's radical Muslim Communist thugs, never to be heard from again.

Quote
Obama will stop at nothing,,,
....to advance his agenda of repressive Socialism upon the country.

Why is it any surprise to anybody that he would seize an opportunity to co-opt children to push his message?

Has anyone forgotten the "Mmm-Mmm-Mmm, Barack Hussein Obama" mantra that was pushed on America's kids by the godless Left teachers?

To you out on the Left, there is but One God: Barack Hussein Obama.

And you won't get that arrogant, hyper-egotistical, self worshipping Muslim in the White House to disagree with you.

For the LibTrolls here today here's a real message for you, if old Mmm-Mmm-Mmm succeeds and causes the collapse of America, you will go down with the rest of us. Don't doubt that for one minute. You are what he and his kind consider "Useful fools".

I just hope people I care the most about will land on you to soften the sudden stop.

Look out for passing buses, Leftists, Obama has his hand on your back ready to shove.

I know this isn't funny to most people, but most self-declared leftists that I know detest Obama.  So I find this post amusing.

Quotethere's always something nice about having vacation time.

It's always nice to get a chance to re charge the batteries

And in the coming months we need everyone ready to fight against the marxist agenda being forced on the country by the dc demonrats.

They break all their promises of transparency and allowing time for the bills to be read

Yet they have no problems voting for bills they won't read

But nov 2010 is coming and that's when the real change gets started

Oppression is always coming later with Obama.  Who remembers Yoo and Addington, who could give oppression on demand?  True heroes, those guys.

QuoteYou are absolutely correct, REAL conservatives and liberals cannot find any common ground. Liberals want socialism(which is godless) and our constitution is NOT made for ANY but a religious nation. Which is why the liberals constantly harp about it being a "livng document". They need to change it to their godless way of thinking.

Personally, I never realized that this country was so full of people who consider themselves to be "liberals" but are still agreeable to seeing our country become communist. At least, I am assuming they aren't full fledged communists like the administration, most of congress and ALL of the main stream media(MSM).

Speaking of the administration, can anyone name one person in it that they would vouch, on penalty of death, was not communist??

Yeah, Geitner is such a Marxist. 

Jenne

Yeah, my mom called me a Communist on Xmas Day on the way back from my aunt's...because I was defending abortion rights.

Sigh.

So I haven't spoken to her since and will be keeping it short from here on out.  NOT that I think "Communist" is the worst insult ever.  It's because SHE thinks it is.  That's enough.


ETA:  Yes, Virginia, there are cuntish moms like my own who WILL insist on arguing politix on long road trips on the holy-daze.   :argh!:

Cain

lol, history

QuoteDuring Joseph Stalin's rule, the trend toward strengthening the family continued. In 1936 the government began to award payments to women with large families and made abortions and divorces more difficult to obtain. In 1942 it subjected single persons and childless married persons to additional taxes. In 1944 only registered marriages were recognized to be legal, and divorce became subject to the court's discretion. In the same year, the government began to award medals to women who gave birth to five or more children and took upon itself the support of illegitimate children.

Cain

http://www.salon.com/opinion/keillor/2009/04/29/retribution/

QuoteRather than square off in a bloody battle over war crimes, let's return decent train service to the Midwest and test out the German maglev (magnetic levitation) system -- the 360 mph trains -- and connect Chicago and St. Paul-Minneapolis, Cleveland, Detroit, Omaha, Kansas City.

Yes, this is someone seriously suggesting no prosecution for torturers and to get the trains running on time.

Does This Remind You Of Anything?

Cain

Apparently there is this new website which is meant to be a conservative version of the HuffPo (because the internet needs more screaming, hyertical, partisan hacks with an inflated sense of self importance, it seems).

Now that alone does not exactly inspire high hopes for the site, but that it is, on its first day, comparing automated ticketing with rape, suggests it may not be a runaway hit either

http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/11/welcome-to-ask-matt-labash/

QuoteLegalized rape. What's that you say? Rape isn't sanctioned in this country? Then you must not live in a city with red-light or speed cameras, where it happens every day. Forget for a second that in one-fourth of all automated ticket cases, the ticketed  car owner wasn't the one actually driving the vehicle at the time of the infraction (what other crime-fighting technology do we consider reliable that nabs the wrong person 25 percent of the time?) Just as heinous is that every year, more and more municipal governments pretend that they plant these all-seeing menaces in the interest of "safety." Yet every year, their revenues tend to  increase from the very same technology. Meaning that the only deterrent effect the technology has is deterring your government from being honest about raping its own citizenry. If you're going to slide me a roofie, Government, at least take me to dinner and a movie first.

Christ, what a douchy toolbag.

Jenne

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/32072.html

Quote"Listen, Republicans will accept our fair share of the blame," Boehner said Wednesday, in response to a reporter's question about whether Republicans had the credibility to talk about responsible spending. "But over the course of the last several years Republicans have stood up on fiscal responsibility issues each and every time."

:lulz:

In other words:  you can blame us, but we aren't really TO BLAME.  :lulz:


Aufenthatt

Quotelook at his behavior towards European countries - look at his behavior towards the Queen and the lack of respect he showed - look at the lack of respect he showed towards the white policeman. He is arrogant. I don't see the European leadership falling over themselves to be standing near him

? Where you even watching?

Italy?

Cain

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/26/opinion/26brooks.html?em

Hating Goldman Sachs is EXACTLY LIKE racism!

Matt Taibbi responds:

QuoteNormally one would have to be in the grip of a narcissistic psychosis to think that a columnist for the New York Times has written an article for your personal benefit. But after his latest article in the Times, in which he compares the "populism" of people who "blame Goldman Sachs" with exactly the sort of racist elitism I ripped him for last week, I think David Brooks might be trying to talk to me.

I think that's at least part of what's going on in his latest column, which is odd. If I were in his position, I probably would have punched me in the nose for the shot I took at him last week, but the response of David Brooks to being called out as a racist weenie is to write a passionate defense of the rich, one that includes the admonition that while blaming the wealthy is easy and feels fun, truly wise men should "tolerate the excesses of traders."

I don't want to get into the position of fixating on one guy for personal reasons. Obviously I've done too much of that with Brooks already, and I absolutely promise to give that part of it a rest for a good long while after this.

But leaving aside any discussion of Brooks the human being, this latest column of his is something that has to be discussed. The propagandistic argument he makes about the dangers of "populism"  is spelled out here as clearly as you'll ever see it expressed in print, and this exact thing is a key reason why so much of the corruption that went on on Wall Street in the past few decades was allowed to spread unchecked.

That's because this argument is tacitly accepted by almost everyone in our business, and most particularly is internalized in the thinking of most newspaper editors and TV news producers, who over time develop an ingrained habitual fear of publishing material that seems hysterical or angry.

This certainly has an effect on the content of news reporting, but perhaps even more importantly, it impacts the tone of news coverage, where outrages are covered without outrage, and stories that are not particularly "balanced" in reality — stories that for instance are quite plainly about one group of people screwing another group of people — become transformed into cool, "objective" news stories in which both the plainly bogus version of events and the real and infuriating version are given equal weight.

Cain

Bonus article http://townhall.com/columnists/DennisPrager/2010/01/26/an_open_letter_to_charles_johnson

Watching American conservatives apologize for Vlaams Belang (a party originally founde by Belgian ex-SS officers and supporters of Nazi Germany) never gets boring.  And apparently calling Ann Coulter a bigot is slander.

Requia ☣

If I was a bigot I'd be pretty pissed I'd been associated with Ann Coulter too.

On that list, number 4.  Do the conservative pundits just not get that abortion is the tip of the iceberg, and that anti-birth control in general is the issue, or is there some training vid somewhere that explains those have to be treated as separate issues when talkig to the public?
Inflatable dolls are not recognized flotation devices.

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: Requia ☣ on January 28, 2010, 02:17:03 PM
If I was a bigot I'd be pretty pissed I'd been associated with Ann Coulter too.

On that list, number 4.  Do the conservative pundits just not get that abortion is the tip of the iceberg, and that anti-birth control in general is the issue, or is there some training vid somewhere that explains those have to be treated as separate issues when talkig to the public?

The REAL issue is a step deeper than that:  Women as property.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Requia ☣

I thought it was 'women as baby factories' but I suppose the property bit would follow pretty damned close if they got that anyway.
Inflatable dolls are not recognized flotation devices.

Bebek Sincap Ratatosk

Wait, they're not property?!

WELL FUCK I WANTED THAT DOWRY!!!   :x

Are they property if we buy them from the weird guy with the van full of smudgy people?
- I don't see race. I just see cars going around in a circle.

"Back in my day, crazy meant something. Now everyone is crazy" - Charlie Manson

Cain

This is hilarious.  By the way, the smart money in this (still ongoing) fight is on Pammy Atlas - insanity beats logic every time:

http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/pam-geller-tries-tell-ron-reagan-jr

QuoteBehar: Ronald, let me ask Ron -- why do we pay attention to this woman? She has a point.

Reagan: Well, indeed, and I think we do have to pay attention to her, unfortunately -- it's sad that we have to pay attention to her, because she's totally unqualified for high office. Yet --

Geller: Your father would love her. Your father would love her.

Miller: First of all, his father didn't quit halfway through the term.

Geller: Neither did she. Neither did she. She did not quit. The Lower 48 needed her, and she heeded the call. She did not take the easy way out.

Reagan: No, she quit. No, Pam, she quit. When you leave the governorship halfway through your first term, it's called quitting. She quit.

Geller: She came to lead the next revolution.

Reagan: Quit. Quit.

Behar: Ron, Ron -- no, I want to hear from Ron. Why would your father not like this woman?

Reagan: Because she doesn't have a thought in her head. That's why.

Geller: That's what they said about your father.

Reagan: My father knew what he stood for, you can agree with it or disagree with it, he knew how -- what he stood for, he could explain what he stood for. He was conversant in domestic and foreign policy -- she's neither! She can't explain where she stands on anything!

Geller: Your father would love her, and frankly I don't think you can speak for your father, because you -- you don't even espouse --

Reagan: No, Pam, actually, have you ever met my father, Pam? Pam, did you ever meet my father?

Geller: Did you ever meet the Founding Father. I've read everything he said. I've read everything he said.

Reagan: Did you ever meet my father? I'm asking you a simple question. You can't answer that because the answer is no. So why don't you rely on someone who knew him very well to tell you what he would think of Sarah Palin.

Behar: It's really hard for you to argue with the offspring of the guy and claim you know more than he does.

Geller: He's nothing like the father! He doesn't share the epistemology of the father. He doesn't have the nature of his father, the knowledge -- he has nothing in common with the father. Look --

Behar: He knows what his father would think rather than you.

Who is the Founding Father, anyway?