News:

PD may suddenly accelerate to dangerous speeds.  If PD splits open, do not look directly at resulting goo.  PD is still legal in 14 states.

Main Menu

Is Mnemonics Fake?

Started by LHX, February 21, 2007, 05:16:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3
User actions

P3nT4gR4m

#30
February 21, 2007, 06:19:15 PM
The very exact same thing they aint gonna get

I'm up to my arse in Brexit Numpties, but I want more.  Target-rich environments are the new sexy.
Not actually a meat product.
Ass-Kicking & Foot-Stomping Ancient Master of SHIT FUCK FUCK FUCK
Awful and Bent Behemothic Results of Last Night's Painful Squat.
High Altitude Haggis-Filled Sex Bucket From Beyond Time and Space.
Internet Monkey Person of Filthy and Immoral Pygmy-Porn Wart Contagion
Octomom Auxillary Heat Exchanger Repairman
walking the fine line line between genius and batshit fucking crazy

"computation is a pattern in the spacetime arrangement of particles, and it's not the particles but the pattern that really matters! Matter doesn't matter." -- Max Tegmark

LMNO

#31
February 21, 2007, 06:20:30 PM
To clarify TGRR, what are your thoughts on Jungian archetypes?

The Good Reverend Roger

#32
February 21, 2007, 06:22:09 PM
Quote from: LMNO on February 21, 2007, 06:20:30 PM
To clarify TGRR, what are your thoughts on Jungian archetypes?

No, no, I want to know what use LHX plans to get out of THIS PARTICULAR group's symbology.

" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

LMNO

#33
February 21, 2007, 06:26:51 PM
Well, my point was going to be that there's a possibility that some of the Tarot symbology can be tied to archetypes.  And if that's a possibility, then it's also possible to manipulate that symbology to affect people who don't know anything conciously about the symbol itself.


The only thing is, one of the few ways to figure out if a symbol might be connected to an archetype is to study the symbology.

The Good Reverend Roger

#34
February 21, 2007, 06:33:42 PM
Quote from: LMNO on February 21, 2007, 06:26:51 PM
Well, my point was going to be that there's a possibility that some of the Tarot symbology can be tied to archetypes.  And if that's a possibility, then it's also possible to manipulate that symbology to affect people who don't know anything conciously about the symbol itself.


The only thing is, one of the few ways to figure out if a symbol might be connected to an archetype is to study the symbology.

Now, how useful is THAT crap?  I mean, come on.  Spotting the "symbology" in tarot cards won't even get you laid at Berkeley, anymore.

And just how do you plan to affect people using tarot cards?  If they're stupid enough to believe in that shit, there are plenty of easier ways to manipulate them. 

I mean, seriously...who gives a FUCK if a symbol "matches an archetype"?  "Archetypes" are nothing more than a means for people like Michael Moorcock, RAW, and Robert Howard to sell you the same poorly-written story 20 times.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

LMNO

#35
February 21, 2007, 06:34:24 PM
Well, that answers that.

The Good Reverend Roger

#36
February 21, 2007, 06:36:35 PM
Quote from: LMNO on February 21, 2007, 06:34:24 PM
Well, that answers that.



I'm a nuts and bolts kinda guy.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

LMNO

#37
February 21, 2007, 06:39:00 PM
So's Doc.  I assume he found you.

The Good Reverend Roger

#38
February 21, 2007, 06:52:15 PM
Quote from: LMNO on February 21, 2007, 06:39:00 PM
So's Doc.  I assume he found you.

Yeah.  One of you fuckers gave him my email addy.

Anyway, Doc will not be around much.  Good talking to him, though.  He was our chief operations planner in Illinois.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

LMNO

#39
February 21, 2007, 06:54:36 PM
I didn't even know you had email.  I figured you got access to this board via your prehensile anus.

The Good Reverend Roger

#40
February 21, 2007, 07:05:30 PM
Quote from: LMNO on February 21, 2007, 06:54:36 PM
I didn't even know you had email.  I figured you got access to this board via your prehensile anus.

No, I use that to smash satellites.  For laughs.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

LHX

#41
February 21, 2007, 08:27:55 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 21, 2007, 06:22:09 PM
Quote from: LMNO on February 21, 2007, 06:20:30 PM
To clarify TGRR, what are your thoughts on Jungian archetypes?

No, no, I want to know what use LHX plans to get out of THIS PARTICULAR group's symbology.


i plan to get feedback

what am i trying to build?
some sort of multimedia machine


there is people here who can do things that other people cant

the style of thought here leads to good feedback

constructive building


if i can understand the limits of communication, i can do what i do better

and not be left writing shit and wondering 'why people dont get it'



i dont even like the group's symbology
i just like the implications of LMNOs metaphor that he spit one day last spring


regardless
there has been progress the past 365
neat hell
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3
User actions