Quote from: Cramulus on November 20, 2018, 06:17:11 PMJust today I wondered how great it would be to have a "Higher-Shelf" in the fridge.
And then, it was right there.
It's funny how the position for boot-licking is so close to the one used for curb-stomping.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Cramulus on November 20, 2018, 06:17:11 PMJust today I wondered how great it would be to have a "Higher-Shelf" in the fridge.
Quote from: Frontside Back on November 07, 2018, 02:49:14 PMRick^3
Musk should just buy some of that shit and film fake Mars landings on the Moon.
Quote from: Dildo Argentino on November 14, 2018, 04:15:19 AMHow about the ADSR envelope of subtractive synthesis. It describes the stages, shape, or outline of change over time. Attack, the amount of time "slope", or velocity at which signal reaches maximum amplitude; Delay, how long it maintains peak; Sustain, the level maintained after peak; and Release, how long it takes to fade? Because, what was this about again?Quote from: chaotic neutral observer on November 14, 2018, 02:34:57 AM
You could arrange preservation/stagnation opposite creation/destruction, but somehow splitting stasis into two elements feels like cheating, since they're just two ways of viewing what is basically the same thing. So that leaves me at creative/destructive/static vs. ordered/disordered/???.
If you divide the static into the preserved and the stagnating, you can also divide the dynamic into development and disruption (which often go hand in hand, too). But where are we going with this?
Quote from: Cramulus on October 24, 2018, 01:42:09 PMI'm v. excited about this, also looking forward to https://movingart.com/fantastic-fungi/
Whattup, buttlords and buttladies, it's ya boy Cramulus, back with my usual nerd shit.
I found out about this magazine called Psychedelic Review, began by the heady cats at the Harvard Psilocybin Research Project. It's a really interesting time capsule, a tour of mid-60s 'tune in, turn on, drop out' subculture and wackadoo spirituality.
As soon as I saw the cover of this thing, I wanted to read it cover to cover. (the Gurdjieff piece and the Rene Daumal essay tip the scales for me) And thank Gawdess we live in a time when we can, immediately. Or at the very least take a peek, read a few paragraphs, then get distracted by something else. It feels very dated, but still retains a lot of its original potency.
MAPS has most of this magazine archived: https://maps.org/research-archive/psychedelicreview/
Quote from: Bobby Campbell on November 10, 2018, 04:20:57 AM"Proof of Principle —Legion"
I am so down for this!
I mean Legion kinda already feels to me like a pretty awesome TV adaptation of the invisibles, but to actually get to see those characters brought to life will be super cool.
Also, I like how the metafictional context of the story gains new depth with a live action mainstream version of the hypersigil
Quote from: Brother Mythos on September 29, 2018, 09:38:08 PM
Get your genuine, artificial Martian dirt here!
UCF Selling Experimental Martian Dirt — $20 a Kilogram, Plus Shipping
As per the article:
'This is not fake news. A team of UCF astrophysicists has developed a scientifically based, standardized method for creating Martian and asteroid soil known as simulants.
The team published its findings this month in the journal Icarus.
"The simulant is useful for research as we look to go to Mars," says Physics Professor Dan Britt, member of UCF's Planetary Sciences Group. "If we are going to go, we'll need food, water and other essentials. As we are developing solutions, we need a way to test how these ideas will fare."
For example, scientists looking for ways to grow food on Mars — cue the 2015 film The Martian — need to test their techniques on soil that most closely resembles the stuff on Mars.'
Hardcore dirt enthusiasts can download the UCF scientific paper, "Mars global simulant MGS-1: A Rocknest-based open standard for basaltic martian regolith simulants," from the following site:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103518303038?via%3Dihub
Quote from: Doktor Howl on September 30, 2018, 04:21:20 PMOf course not. I consumed it!Quote from: LuciferX on August 08, 2018, 08:20:28 AMQuote from: Doktor Howl on August 08, 2018, 06:26:49 AMMust capitalize 'm' in T.Quote from: Prelate Diogenes Shandor on August 08, 2018, 04:21:00 AMQuote from: Doktor Howl on August 05, 2018, 11:41:21 PMSee, tiene to capitalize deh 'm' in TQuote from: chaotic neutral observer on August 05, 2018, 05:16:08 PMQuote from: Prelate Diogenes Shandor on August 05, 2018, 10:04:13 AM
And, in addition to resources and the environment, we also need backup civilizations out of ICBM range so everything isn't wiped out when one of the shitheads in charge of the world hits the big red button
I find it hard to conceive of a nuclear war that would make Earth less habitable than Mars (or the Moon). Even if you take into account nuclear winter, massive fallout, large sections of geography glassed over, 99% extinction rate, it's not as if nuclear war would actually rip the atmosphere off the planet. There's a pretty big difference between "if you leave the bunker without protection, you might die of cancer in six months" to "if you leave the base without a space suit, you'll asphyxiate in 60 seconds".
No, I don't think we should go to Mars with any practical objectives in mind. Someone is going to need to make up some sort of plausible justification to generate the necessary political will, but I doubt the reasons will be legitimate.
I think we should go to Mars just for the lulz. Humanity needs to get out of the house once in a while, try new things. We can figure out if there were any tangible benefits afterward.
1000 mT inside of a month kills off EVERYTHING except maybe vent worms.
And we have an ecological crash happening right now. Wasted resources are wasted. There's actual work to be done.
What is that figure based on? That's not nearly enough to glass the entire planet, the ice age didn;t kill everything, plenty of animals are resistant to radiation, and most importantly the Chicxulub impact is extimated to have released the equivalent explosive force of 20 million megatons of TNT, with all that entails.
EDIT:
@CN Observer: However, what I said was "civilization" not "life" or even "humans". The survivors of a full scale nuclear war would quickly be reduced to savagery, especially given that the most savage areas of the planet (the flyover states, the third world, etc.) would probably be hit the least hard whereas cities and other bastions of civilization would probably get most of the brunt of it
It is based on SDI studies in the 1980s. 1000 mT kicks up a radioactive cloud that kills what the freezing doesn't.
Did you just assume my dialect?
Quote from: chaotic neutral observer on November 02, 2018, 12:24:01 AMQuote from: axod on November 02, 2018, 12:05:15 AMssh is not physical access. I would consider remote privilege escalation (via ssh) a more serious problem.Quote from: chaotic neutral observer on November 01, 2018, 11:04:08 PMyou could remotely ssh and escalate any user to root without physical access or reboot privs. or, is ssh considered physical access?
I don't worry too much about exploits that require console access. Unless the admin is paranoid, physical access is enough to hack most linux boxes with no more than a reboot. Just set init=/bin/bash in the bootloader, and you're in.
What I mean, is that if you're physically present at the computer's console (keyboard and display), you can often get control over it quite easily (which may include unplugging it, picking it up, and walking away).
This is the sort of thing I'm talking about: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Reset_lost_root_password
Edit: And to make the context clear, it appears that CVE-2018-14665 requires console access.