There Has Been An Error!

[Triple Zero]

JUST FOR your uptight panty concerns. Yes I would. I don't consider this such a serious "argument" that i can't be light-hearted.

What is "uptight" about being annoyed over someone taking the piss on a country for no apparent reason at all?

In that manner, what is "light-hearted" about taking the piss on a country for no reason at all?

the trail of epic disaster follows nuclear power everywhere it goes, I think it's insane to continue fucking with it.

Everywhere?!?!

Please stop driving your car, don't you see the PILES OF EPIC DISASTER they leave EVERYWHERE??

Do stay away from tall buildings or airplanes, just to be sure.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

The French really do make excellent cheese, though.

[Doktor Howl]

Hanford wasn't an accident, right?  It was just a case of "BUILD BOMBS FASTER, DON'T SWEAT THE SMALL SHIT LIKE WHERE TO PUT THE HORRIBLE GOO", I thought.

This is not the same as reactors being safe or unsafe.

[Doktor Howl]

Incidentally, a line very much like that one resulted in my son.

[East Coast Hustle]

Hanford wasn't an accident, right?  It was just a case of "BUILD BOMBS FASTER, DON'T SWEAT THE SMALL SHIT LIKE WHERE TO PUT THE HORRIBLE GOO", I thought.

This is not the same as reactors being safe or unsafe.

no, no, no...Hanford was an EPIC DISASTER. You can tell because of the smoking radioactive crater where Richland used to be.

[Doktor Howl]

Hanford wasn't an accident, right?  It was just a case of "BUILD BOMBS FASTER, DON'T SWEAT THE SMALL SHIT LIKE WHERE TO PUT THE HORRIBLE GOO", I thought.

This is not the same as reactors being safe or unsafe.

no, no, no...Hanford was an EPIC DISASTER. You can tell because of the smoking radioactive crater where Richland used to be.

Okay.  Waiting for the bad part.

[East Coast Hustle]

The bad part is that Richland is still there.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Hanford wasn't an accident, right?  It was just a case of "BUILD BOMBS FASTER, DON'T SWEAT THE SMALL SHIT LIKE WHERE TO PUT THE HORRIBLE GOO", I thought.

This is not the same as reactors being safe or unsafe.

There were also some accidents which were largely covered up until after the fact, which contributed to the radioactive sludge at the bottom of the Columbia which still prevents us from eating shellfish harvested from the mouth of the river.

Obviously Trojan was also a contributor.

I wonder what the half-life of driving automobiles is?

[cavehamster]

Having skipped all the replies to add my viewpoint, I just would like to say that we'd have no worries about running out of fuel in any reasonable amount of time if we could build breeder reactors that could re-process the waste.

But noooo you can make weapons grade shit with that, so they are banned, so instead we have to use the isotope of uranium that we have the least amount of.  Gah!

Besides, modern pebble bed reactors are about as safe as it gets.  Unlike coal, you are not spewing radiation into the air (really, coal has a lot of radioactive elements in it), you are containing it in one place.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Having skipped all the replies to add my viewpoint, I just would like to say that we'd have no worries about running out of fuel in any reasonable amount of time if we could build breeder reactors that could re-process the waste.

But noooo you can make weapons grade shit with that, so they are banned, so instead we have to use the isotope of uranium that we have the least amount of.  Gah!

Besides, modern pebble bed reactors are about as safe as it gets.  Unlike coal, you are not spewing radiation into the air (really, coal has a lot of radioactive elements in it), you are containing it in one place.

It's good that you skipped all the replies, as it's a fairly safe assumption that no matter what it is you have to say, no one else has already thought of it over the course of the last four pages.

[Doktor Howl]

Having skipped all the replies to add my viewpoint, I just would like to say that we'd have no worries about running out of fuel in any reasonable amount of time if we could build breeder reactors that could re-process the waste.

But noooo you can make weapons grade shit with that, so they are banned, so instead we have to use the isotope of uranium that we have the least amount of.  Gah!

Besides, modern pebble bed reactors are about as safe as it gets.  Unlike coal, you are not spewing radiation into the air (really, coal has a lot of radioactive elements in it), you are containing it in one place.

It's good that you skipped all the replies, as it's a fairly safe assumption that no matter what it is you have to say, no one else has already thought of it over the course of the last four pages.

Ouch!

Acerbic Nigel is acerbic.   

[Triple Zero]

Having skipped all the replies to add my viewpoint, I just would like to say that we'd have no worries about running out of fuel in any reasonable amount of time if we could build breeder reactors that could re-process the waste.

But noooo you can make weapons grade shit with that, so they are banned, so instead we have to use the isotope of uranium that we have the least amount of.  Gah!

Besides, modern pebble bed reactors are about as safe as it gets.  Unlike coal, you are not spewing radiation into the air (really, coal has a lot of radioactive elements in it), you are containing it in one place.

It's good that you skipped all the replies, as it's a fairly safe assumption that no matter what it is you have to say, no one else has already thought of it over the course of the last four pages.

Did somebody already mention this? Serious question cause it was new to me, but I could have missed it. I'm pretty sure I think I read all four page, if you don't mind me not going to read four pages just to check if I indeed read everything in those four pages

[Doktor Howl]

Having skipped all the replies to add my viewpoint, I just would like to say that we'd have no worries about running out of fuel in any reasonable amount of time if we could build breeder reactors that could re-process the waste.

But noooo you can make weapons grade shit with that, so they are banned, so instead we have to use the isotope of uranium that we have the least amount of.  Gah!

Besides, modern pebble bed reactors are about as safe as it gets.  Unlike coal, you are not spewing radiation into the air (really, coal has a lot of radioactive elements in it), you are containing it in one place.

It's good that you skipped all the replies, as it's a fairly safe assumption that no matter what it is you have to say, no one else has already thought of it over the course of the last four pages.

Did somebody already mention this? Serious question cause it was new to me, but I could have missed it. I'm pretty sure I think I read all four page, if you don't mind me not going to read four pages just to check if I indeed read everything in those four pages

Who cares?  She was nicer than I was going to be.  Cavehamster has a habit of constantly making sure everyone knows how little he cares about their opinions, debating points, etc.  He's a complete shit, and I can't think of anything that would make me come to his defense.  I would not piss down his neck if his heart was on fire.

Fuck him.  Fuck him in his ear.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Having skipped all the replies to add my viewpoint, I just would like to say that we'd have no worries about running out of fuel in any reasonable amount of time if we could build breeder reactors that could re-process the waste.

But noooo you can make weapons grade shit with that, so they are banned, so instead we have to use the isotope of uranium that we have the least amount of.  Gah!

Besides, modern pebble bed reactors are about as safe as it gets.  Unlike coal, you are not spewing radiation into the air (really, coal has a lot of radioactive elements in it), you are containing it in one place.

It's good that you skipped all the replies, as it's a fairly safe assumption that no matter what it is you have to say, no one else has already thought of it over the course of the last four pages.

Ouch!

Acerbic Nigel is acerbic.   

Replying without reading everything first is something I specialize in, so I think I'm well-qualified to comment.

[cavehamster]

Having skipped all the replies to add my viewpoint, I just would like to say that we'd have no worries about running out of fuel in any reasonable amount of time if we could build breeder reactors that could re-process the waste.

But noooo you can make weapons grade shit with that, so they are banned, so instead we have to use the isotope of uranium that we have the least amount of.  Gah!

Besides, modern pebble bed reactors are about as safe as it gets.  Unlike coal, you are not spewing radiation into the air (really, coal has a lot of radioactive elements in it), you are containing it in one place.

It's good that you skipped all the replies, as it's a fairly safe assumption that no matter what it is you have to say, no one else has already thought of it over the course of the last four pages.

Did somebody already mention this? Serious question cause it was new to me, but I could have missed it. I'm pretty sure I think I read all four page, if you don't mind me not going to read four pages just to check if I indeed read everything in those four pages

Who cares?  She was nicer than I was going to be.  Cavehamster has a habit of constantly making sure everyone knows how little he cares about their opinions, debating points, etc.  He's a complete shit, and I can't think of anything that would make me come to his defense.  I would not piss down his neck if his heart was on fire.

Fuck him.  Fuck him in his ear.

I like your style, well done!