Quote from: Thurnez Isa on November 02, 2009, 03:55:25 PMI never claimed it wasn't effective and said that it was interesting. I just wanted to know if it was any better that what there already was. Because this treatment's processing is complex. And complex is often less effective, people often make high tech technologies for a lot of things where old things simply still work better for. Like that person that invented some kind of controlled laser demolition and his company went broke on it because no one was interested as dynamite still worked better.
because its the same effect
"This is a drug that will make you better" - but of course the drug doesn't actually exist
"This is the drug that your addicted do and taking it here in smaller margins will make you better" - but of course the drug doesn't actually exist.
and they have studied cocaine placebos since the 70's and the still do study it
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1864767,00.html
it's a different treatment (Im not going to repeat with RWHN said so look back) ... and since they have been studying it for years now, and nothing has come of it, despite a couple of positive sounding news articles, I wouldn't be holding my breath on it
When you test treatments you don't test your treatment against someone elses treatment. You test it against your treatment, so you could try to falsify your hypothesis. \
No treatment is going to be 100 % effective so you have to a variety of ... Now Im repeating RWHN
I asked about two pages back if this was better than a placebo cocaine pill and gave been getting back unrelated answers since. I never said it wasn't effective, I just wanted to know if it was better than a placebo cocaine pill because the last option is a lot simpler to make.