A choose your own Intermittens (or something)

[Dead Kennedy]

Bah. I wouldn't be annoyed with ambiguously worded links. After all, that's 3/4s of the fun of something like zork or advent, right? If you apply totally unambiguous and completely correct labels to a nonfiction thing the same way you might otherwise apply it to a narrative, although *some* people may take advantage of the nonlinear text aspect, *most* people are going to use it to create a "daily me", which I don't think is the point.

That said, I'm assuming that this is based on something non-narrative in form. If we are going by the history of the movement{s,}, then if we assume that people don't already know much of it, we might have something interesting come out of it.

Furthermore, I suppose I should give examples to elucidate what I mean by misleading or ambiguous labels.

I do not mean:

* Peanut
* Fnord gobbler

Instead, I mean something more like:

* But, let's step back in time a bit to something that may be of interest to our protagonists Thornley and the gang
* Or, we can step forward, to see what came out of it.
* Or we can take a break at the local coffee house

That's awesome.  I actually really like that idea, and like the examples.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Bah. I wouldn't be annoyed with ambiguously worded links. After all, that's 3/4s of the fun of something like zork or advent, right? If you apply totally unambiguous and completely correct labels to a nonfiction thing the same way you might otherwise apply it to a narrative, although *some* people may take advantage of the nonlinear text aspect, *most* people are going to use it to create a "daily me", which I don't think is the point.

That said, I'm assuming that this is based on something non-narrative in form. If we are going by the history of the movement{s,}, then if we assume that people don't already know much of it, we might have something interesting come out of it.

Furthermore, I suppose I should give examples to elucidate what I mean by misleading or ambiguous labels.

I do not mean:

* Peanut
* Fnord gobbler

Instead, I mean something more like:

* But, let's step back in time a bit to something that may be of interest to our protagonists Thornley and the gang
* Or, we can step forward, to see what came out of it.
* Or we can take a break at the local coffee house

That wouldn't be so bad, because they're related to the storyline and don't leave the user completely lost. I would describe those examples as less "ambiguous" and more "creatively worded".

[Rococo Modem Basilisk]

Well, by more ambiguous, I meant more ambiguous than:
* Click here to learn more about the dada movement!
* Click here to download a trojan horse that will delete necessary system files

[the last yatto]

Without information to base the choice on, the reader is simply picking a random page.

so if the focus was only on religious and politics
then if your this goto page x, if your that goto page y?