This thread is now about Furries, for some reason. Formerly: "So. Anonymous."

[BADGE OF HONOR]

Man-boobs are accurate.

[Cramulus]

[Ari]

lol internet.

[Bebek Sincap Ratatosk]

Oh, and anyone who just likes the "art" needs to learn how to draw humans and get the fuck over himself.  






And by human I mean human, not anime-people.

Damn Straight! Badger's view of art, or it ain't art!

[Elder Iptuous]

Y'know the funny thing is, i've always kinda viewed badger as a furry because of her handle....

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Oh, and anyone who just likes the "art" needs to learn how to draw humans and get the fuck over himself.  






And by human I mean human, not anime-people.

Damn Straight! Badger's view of art, or it ain't art!

You know, art can't really be defined, but I know poorly-executed drawings when I see them.

[Bebek Sincap Ratatosk]

Oh, and anyone who just likes the "art" needs to learn how to draw humans and get the fuck over himself.  






And by human I mean human, not anime-people.

Damn Straight! Badger's view of art, or it ain't art!

You know, art can't really be defined, but I know poorly-executed drawings when I see them.

I agree, and I thought the horse dude was a pretty bad drawing. But then, I think most of what 'artists' call art is kinda crappy.

However, I don't think the anthropomorphic nature of the subject was the problem, nearly as much as the poor drawing skills of the individual.

[Mangrove]

I was willing to ignore furries until words like 'fursona' and 'fursecution' came up.

My biggest fear right now is that some furries will team up with historically deluded Wiccans and suggest that wearing animal artefacts as part of tribal shamanism was an early form of 'furry'.

OMG BURNING TIMES PART II!!

[P3nT4gR4m]

Mangrove - ever the optimist 

[Mangrove]

I was willing to ignore furries until words like 'fursona' and 'fursecution' came up.

My biggest fear right now is that some furries will team up with historically deluded Wiccans and suggest that wearing animal artefacts as part of tribal shamanism was an early form of 'furry'.
OMG BURNING TIMES PART II!!

Someone better call MysticWicks!

[Dysfunctional Cunt]

I've never cared what anyone did as/with/to consenting adults in the privacy of their own place of choice.  PRIVATE being the key word.  I don't "get" the whole furry thing, then again, I don't "get" the S&M thing either.  

I have to agree, if people are dressing up as Pooh or other children's characters, there are probably some "issues" there that need to be dealt with, however, if they're just doing their thing in a run of the mill forest creature costume, then let them go for it.  It's not my place to decide if someone is whacked out cause they like to get it on in a costume.  Though I have to think those damn costumes have to be really really hot and super sweaty and must be a fortuen to clean to keep them from stinking and that to me is just EWWW!

As for the art, I don't understand half of the art in the world.  I mean they make sculpture from milk cartons and it's art.  Someone glues a bunch of buttons to a lamp and it's art.  It doesn't work for me.

What Suu and Fred draw, that is art.  The clothes Suu creates, that to me is art.  Nigel's beads, those are art.  For me art is an expression of creativity.  I may or may not like it, but I only have to buy or look at what I like right?

Just don't shove  the furry thing, or the furry 'art' or anything like that in my face and I won't be a total bitch about how much I hate it and what a load of crap it is....  That's fair right?

[Bebek Sincap Ratatosk]

I was willing to ignore furries until words like 'fursona' and 'fursecution' came up.

My biggest fear right now is that some furries will team up with historically deluded Wiccans and suggest that wearing animal artefacts as part of tribal shamanism was an early form of 'furry'.

OMG BURNING TIMES PART II!!

 

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

Personally I'm not convinced that there's harm being perpetrated [by zoophiles having sex with animals], but its a hard sell.

What evidence would be necessary to demonstrate that harm has been perpetrated?

What species are compatible with humans that you know of?

If you know any, what are the behavioral cues to indicate willingness? How about unwillingness?

[Dysfunctional Cunt]

Personally I'm not convinced that there's harm being perpetrated [by zoophiles having sex with animals], but its a hard sell.

What evidence would be necessary to demonstrate that harm has been perpetrated?

What species are compatible with humans that you know of?

If so, what are the behavioral cues to indicate willingness? How about unwillingness?

I didn't address this because personally I think anyone who has sex with an animal is just disgusting.  It is a kind of abuse.  There is no animal on this planet that has the mental capacity or verbal ability to come up to a human being and say "fuck me".  There are reasons why some of the old laws about single men owning certain farm animals are still on the books.....

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

Personally I'm not convinced that there's harm being perpetrated [by zoophiles having sex with animals], but its a hard sell.

What evidence would be necessary to demonstrate that harm has been perpetrated?

What species are compatible with humans that you know of?

If so, what are the behavioral cues to indicate willingness? How about unwillingness?

I didn't address this because personally I think anyone who has sex with an animal is just disgusting.  It is a kind of abuse.  There is no animal on this planet that has the mental capacity or verbal ability to come up to a human being and say "fuck me".  There are reasons why some of the old laws about single men owning certain farm animals are still on the books.....

Where did you get your degree in ethology?