You Bet Your Bippy

[Mangrove]

Yup.


No one wanted to actually step up and help out.  So it died.

what was the project? my memory's blank.

[LMNO]

There were a couple of things.  But there was talk of a magazine/periodical, I believe.

[P3nT4gR4m]

[Mangrove]

There were a couple of things.  But there was talk of a magazine/periodical, I believe.

i see. well, i'll tread very lightly and whisper in hushed tones until the new projects hit the streets.

[doesn't want to curse something that resembles real activity]

[Jasper]

Excellent!  Thank you, Prof. Cramulus.  Yeah, I might review our material as well with what you said in mind, this week.

[Cain]

There were a couple of things.  But there was talk of a magazine/periodical, I believe.

I must have missed that.  That could have been interesting, an e-magazine of some sorts.

[Triple Zero]

I had an idea once to start a religion (yeah you can mock) Part of the mission was to produce an annual bible, a concept I always thought the mainstream religions could benefit from adopting - "If your ideology hasn't produced anything new this year then your god is dead, please step down from the pulpit."

Maybe the BIP (or a document on those lines) could become a bible like this, albeit under a different monicker. All it would take is a month or so before december make an announcement and anyone interested can spend a couple of days trawling through the years posts, looking for little nuggets to squeeze in, then the rest of the time would be spent deciding on a final shortlist and production of said 'holy book'. Anyone interested gimme a shout about mid October.

this is a terribly good idea!

[hunter s.durden]

I want Silly's mag.
brownies.... mmmm....

[LHX]

damn yall motherfuckers are on a roll over here


also just so the Prof knows - the whole organization aspect of things was a real point of contention back in May/June and led to some real interesting discussion


it really forced us to be cautious about coming across as tho we had 'answers'

[Cramulus]

Very interesting. I'll have to take a lurk through there/then.

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

There were a couple of things.  But there was talk of a magazine/periodical, I believe.

The problem there revolves around the problem of organization (gravity OFUK!) that hasn't been resolved.

[Triple Zero]

also just so the Prof knows - the whole organization aspect of things was a real point of contention back in May/June and led to some real interesting discussion

though now that we sort of see that we can actually get shit done and produce valuable (kind of) content, it seems that we have a whole lot less problems with the idea of organisation.

well, ok, nobody has stepped up as a manager, editor or whatever (yet?), but I remember some people (myself included) initially worrying about *any* organized set-up for discordian productions.

[LMNO]

That's probably why the pamphlets seem so... unprofessional.  Since no one really wanted to play editor, we pretty much threw it together and said, "go".


What the Prof is doing (honest criticism of another's work) is pretty ballsy, and I appreciate the effort.

[LHX]

we walk a thankless road

who wants to be editor for that?


we ride the hot hand - and its prolly gonna stay that way (<--- fearless prediction ITT)

[LMNO]

"ride the hot hand"?






Is that some sort of porn-type lingo?