You have got to be fucking kidding me.
http://www.broadstreetreview.com/index.php/main/article/male_sex_abuse_and_female_naivete/
QuoteLogan's cleavage
Smullens argues that women need to speak up and speak out when they're victimized, as Lara Logan has done, and of course she is right. But having stumbled across a CBS publicity photo for Lara Logan (above), I can't help thinking that women also need to take sensible precautions before they're victimized.
For example: Don't trust your male friends. Don't go to a man's home at night unless you're prepared to have sex with him. Don't disrobe in front of a male masseur. If you take a job as a masseuse, don't be shocked if your male customers think you're a prostitute. And if you want to be taken seriously as a journalist, don't pose for pictures that emphasize your cleavage.
Yes, yes, I know: Each of us wears many personas. A woman journalist like Lara Logan should be able to celebrate herself as both a journalist and a woman, even a sexy woman. But the operative word in that sentence— should— is the sticky point.
From rape to war
Many of the tragedies mentioned above spring from what I see as a naïve faith in the power of the modern sexual revolution. Women today are technically free to do all sorts of things that were forbidden to their grandmothers, which is all well and good. But in practice, rape and the notion of sexual conquest persist for the same reason that warfare persists: because the human animal— especially the male animal— craves drama as much as food, shelter and clothing. Conquering an unwilling sex partner is about as much drama as a man can find without shooting a gun— and, of course, guns haven't disappeared either.
Earth to liberated women: When you display legs, thighs or cleavage, some liberated men will see it as a sign that you feel good about yourself and your sexuality. But most men will see it as a sign that you want to get laid.
I guess I'm not most men, then. Sure, a lady goes walking by, dressed to kill, I'm going to give her a glance...I appreciate the female form. However, this doesn't extend to a license to stare, let alone count as tacit permission for me to lay hands on them.
In addition, I am more than a little puzzled. I have had women stop by after dark, and I also didn't count THAT as an invitation to have sex.
I think, rather, that the author of the article is a screwball that hasn't had pussy since pussy had him, hence the misogyny.
That's where the entire argument falls down, Dok.
"Human nature" is a cop-out. It explains nothing. If "human nature" is why men rape, and that rape can be triggered by seeing bare female flesh, why aren't beaches and swimming pools rape-a-thons?
It's the laziest argument in the world, in addition to everything else.
Also, the author clearly isn't read on the literature about the uses of rape in war. Clue-bus: most war is about wiping out rival ethnic groups. Most traditions see lineage as being passed down through male relationships. Do the maths.
I think it's a bit of a gross generalization as well to say "most men will see it as a sign that you want to get laid"
Sure, a lot of men do think that way...but most? That's just lazy thinking.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on June 28, 2011, 04:33:51 PM
I guess I'm not most men, then. Sure, a lady goes walking by, dressed to kill, I'm going to give her a glance...I appreciate the female form. However, this doesn't extend to a license to stare, let alone count as tacit permission for me to lay hands on them.
In addition, I am more than a little puzzled. I have had women stop by after dark, and I also didn't count THAT as an invitation to have sex.
I think, rather, that the author of the article is a screwball that hasn't had pussy since pussy had him, hence the misogyny.
:mittens:
I think the article was disturbingly far more revealing of the author's own modus operandi than of anything else. He needs to read more about rape psychology. Rapists don't select victims because they're aroused... men are not helpless slaves to their hard-ons. Rapists select victims based on a combination of vulnerability and opportunity.
DEAR SIR:
I JUST SAW A WOMAN'S BARE ANKLE. AM I ALLOWED TO RAPE HER?
Ironically, this is almost the exact same argument Islamic extremists make for forcing women to cover their entire body and shield it from being viewed in public.
So in other words, this guy is taking his cues on rape from the likes of the Taliban.
Quote from: LMNO, PhD on June 28, 2011, 04:48:45 PM
DEAR SIR:
I JUST SAW A WOMAN'S BARE ANKLE. AM I ALLOWED TO RAPE HER?
IT IS REQUIRED, SHE IS ASKING FOR IT.
Quote from: Cain on June 28, 2011, 04:51:50 PM
Ironically, this is almost the exact same argument Islamic extremists make for forcing women to cover their entire body and shield it from being viewed in public.
So in other words, this guy is taking his cues on rape from the likes of the Taliban.
THIS. It's a way of infantilizing men.
Dear sirs,
This afternoon, a woman walked by my, and I just knew that she had a vagina and breasts underneath her police uniform.
Please confirm that it was not wrong for me to rape her, because I knew from her wedding ring that she was not a virgin, and obviously, due to her vaginal ownership, was capable of sex.
PS - Send bail money.
Jesus H. Christ on a fucking pogo stick... And they haven't had this jackwipe publicly flogged?
Fuck, considering I wore at least one V-necked shirt at the meatup, I apparently temped a near dozen of you spags into having your wicked, demented ways with me. You'd think I would remember it. Wasn't your fault, boys, you're weak, and a flash of cleavage is beyond any male's tolerance...
Quote from: Luna on June 28, 2011, 07:05:07 PM
Jesus H. Christ on a fucking pogo stick... And they haven't had this jackwipe publicly flogged?
Fuck, considering I wore at least one V-necked shirt at the meatup, I apparently temped a near dozen of you spags into having your wicked, demented ways with me. You'd think I would remember it. Wasn't your fault, boys, you're weak, and a flash of cleavage is beyond any male's tolerance...
You have no idea the restraint required. We have a convent in Tucson, and I saw one of those vixens flash a little ankle while crossing the street. Thank God I got tangled in the seatbelt, or I'd be in jail now.
BRB, RAPING THE CFO FOR WEARING A SKIRT.
Shit, they must have to have all of the women of Pittsburgh and Philadelphia under 24/7 guard during Rumspringa.
Quote from: LMNO, PhD on June 28, 2011, 07:10:39 PM
BRB, RAPING THE CFO FOR WEARING A SKIRT.
BRB, RAPING LMNO FOR WEARING THAT SEXY-ASS HAT!
BRB, RAPING DOK HOWL FOR THAT DEAD SEXY BALD HEAD.
WEAR THE MOUSTACHE, AND YOU GET THE REACHAROUND.
Quote from: LMNO, PhD on June 28, 2011, 07:15:25 PM
BRB, RAPING DOK HOWL FOR THAT DEAD SEXY BALD HEAD.
WEAR THE MOUSTACHE, AND YOU GET THE REACHAROUND.
DOK,
WEARING TWO (2) MUSTACHES. WHAT NOW?
Also, I have only myself to blame. :cry:
Quote
Conquering an unwilling sex partner is about as much drama as a man can find without shooting a gun— and, of course, guns haven't disappeared either.
Rape and guns, it's what Men™ live for.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on June 28, 2011, 07:18:24 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD on June 28, 2011, 07:15:25 PM
BRB, RAPING DOK HOWL FOR THAT DEAD SEXY BALD HEAD.
WEAR THE MOUSTACHE, AND YOU GET THE REACHAROUND.
DOK,
WEARING TWO (2) MUSTACHES. WHAT NOW?
ZALGO PORN.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on June 28, 2011, 07:18:51 PM
Also, I have only myself to blame. :cry:
TRUTH™.
Don't undress in front of a male masseuse? The fuck? Are you supposed to keep your clothes on at the gynecologist too?
Quote from: BabylonHoruv on June 28, 2011, 07:24:52 PM
Don't undress in front of a male masseuse? The fuck? Are you supposed to keep your clothes on at the gynecologist too?
UNLESS YOU WANT TO GET RAPED.
(http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/upload/2009/10/a_very_unusual_present/speculum.jpeg)
YOU GONNA GET RAEPD
This is actually a pretty creepy picture.
I am highly amused that the speculum is shining like some sort of Holy Object™.
or Unholy Terror!
I'm glad I'm a guy.
Quote from: LMNO, PhD on June 28, 2011, 07:38:55 PM
I am highly amused that the speculum is shining like some sort of Holy Object™.
My first thought: I KNEW the fucking things are made of ice!
Clearly the bozo who wrote the article has some problems with rational thought. And/or he thinks being a douche will get him recognized somehow. Perhaps he aspires to be the next Glen Beck?
What a bunch of hogswallow.
If the author believes what he said he should be arguing to bring in the burqa
Quote from: Thurnez Isa on June 28, 2011, 08:27:49 PM
If the author believes what he said he should be arguing to bring in the burqa staked out on a bed of fire ants.
Fixed that.
Today's Women no longer feel any sense of duty towards their Husbands. They're quick enough to promise to "Honour and obey" you, but the moment you ask them to do you a simple favour, like bring you a cake with a gun it, they're straight round to the Prison Authorities with the letter! :argh!:
Quote from: Charley Brown on June 28, 2011, 08:28:55 PM
Quote from: Thurnez Isa on June 28, 2011, 08:27:49 PM
If the author believes what he said he should be arguing to bring in the burqa staked out on a bed of fire ants.
Fixed that.
:kiss:
Agreed.
Quote from: Cain on June 28, 2011, 04:51:50 PM
Ironically, this is almost the exact same argument Islamic extremists make for forcing women to cover their entire body and shield it from being viewed in public.
So in other words, this guy is taking his cues on rape from the likes of the Taliban.
It's an alarmingly short step from there to "If a woman appears in public without a male chaperone, she's asking to be raped".
I keep expecting it to be retracted with "LOLsocialexperiment" but so far it hasn't happened. :x
ONE TIME, I WITNESSED A FEMALE LEAN OVER TO GRAB SOMETHING, AND A SINGLE INCH OF BARE SKIN BECAME VISIBLE UNDER HER SHIRT
BEING A MINDLESS AUTOMATA OF MEAT AND SPOOGE-HAPPY HORMONES, I HAD NO CHOICE
I'M THE VICTIM HERE
Most of those Women in the workplace are actually NAKED under those clothes they wear, but the minute you try to cop a feel of her tits in the stock cupboard, it's all "sexual harassment" this, and "restraining order" that!
BECAUSE WOMEN CAN BE RAPISTS TOO.
QuoteLogan's tight-fitting shirt
Smullens argues that men need to speak up and speak out when they're victimized, as Larry Logan has done, and of course he is right. But having stumbled across a CBS publicity photo for Larry Logan (above), I can't help thinking that men also need to take sensible precautions before they're victimized.
For example: Don't trust your female friends. Don't go to a woman's home at night unless you're prepared to have sex with her. Don't disrobe in front of a female masseuse. If you take a job as a masseur, don't be shocked if your female customers think you're a prostitute. And if you want to be taken seriously as a journalist, don't pose for pictures with a tight-fitting shirt.
Yes, yes, I know: Each of us wears many personas. A man journalist like Larry Logan should be able to celebrate himself as both a journalist and a man, even a sexy man. But the operative word in that sentence— should— is the sticky point.
From rape to war
Many of the tragedies mentioned above spring from what I see as a naïve faith in the power of the modern sexual revolution. Men today are technically free to do all sorts of things that were forbidden to their grandfathers, which is all well and good. But in practice, rape and the notion of sexual conquest persist for the same reason that warfare persists: because the human animal— especially the female animal— craves drama as much as food, shelter and clothing. Conquering an unwilling sex partner is about as much drama as a woman can find without shooting a gun— and, of course, guns haven't disappeared either.
Earth to liberated men: When you display legs, thighs or tight-fitting shirt, some liberated women will see it as a sign that you feel good about yourself and your sexuality. But most women will see it as a sign that you want to get laid.
Quote from: Lenin McCarthy on June 29, 2011, 01:03:09 AM
BECAUSE WOMEN CAN BE RAPISTS TOO.
QuoteLogan's tight-fitting shirt
Smullens argues that men need to speak up and speak out when they're victimized, as Larry Logan has done, and of course he is right. But having stumbled across a CBS publicity photo for Larry Logan (above), I can't help thinking that men also need to take sensible precautions before they're victimized.
For example: Don't trust your female friends. Don't go to a woman's home at night unless you're prepared to have sex with her. Don't disrobe in front of a female masseur. If you take a job as a masseur, don't be shocked if your female customers think you're a prostitute. And if you want to be taken seriously as a journalist, don't pose for pictures with a tight-fitting shirt.
Yes, yes, I know: Each of us wears many personas. A man journalist like Larry Logan should be able to celebrate himself as both a journalist and a man, even a sexy man. But the operative word in that sentence— should— is the sticky point.
From rape to war
Many of the tragedies mentioned above spring from what I see as a naïve faith in the power of the modern sexual revolution. Men today are technically free to do all sorts of things that were forbidden to their grandfathers, which is all well and good. But in practice, rape and the notion of sexual conquest persist for the same reason that warfare persists: because the human animal— especially the female animal— craves drama as much as food, shelter and clothing. Conquering an unwilling sex partner is about as much drama as a woman can find without shooting a gun— and, of course, guns haven't disappeared either.
Earth to liberated men: When you display legs, thighs or tight-fitting shirt, some liberated women will see it as a sign that you feel good about yourself and your sexuality. But most women will see it as a sign that you want to get laid.
I like this, but you should switch "masseur" and "masseuse" because masseur is the male and masseuse is the female.
Quote from: DANGEROUS DOPE FIEND on June 29, 2011, 01:13:45 AM
I like this, but you should switch "masseur" and "masseuse" because masseur is the male and masseuse is the female.
Thanks. Corrected it now.
I think burkas are sexy. :fap: