This is genius!
I have tried and can't even remember what it was i wanted to not remember!
Who am I? Why are the walls melting? Oooh pretty dancing oily waves!
Please oh master, tell me more!
OK fuckers, let me out of here. I farted for you, what more do you want from me? Jesus fuck.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=!define+durityIncidentally, "durity" means "obsolete", so you're saying that physicists are more obsolete than mathematicians. Is that what you meant to say?
https://translate.google.ru/#la/en/dure or https://translate.google.ru/#fr/en/dure
"durity" in this context like "dirty"
So, anyone remember Andrea Dworkin? Looks like someone's giving her some competition.Member either means limb or penis. specifying large member implies that either the penis is bigger than the other members or that the man is thrusting an arm or leg into her most intimate parts. The 'she is doing sex wrong' argument is getting stronger.
Excerpts:QuoteIntercourse is the very means through which men oppress us, from which we are not allowed to escape, yet some instances of or PIV and intercourse may be chosen and free? That makes no sense at all.
As FCM pointed out some time ago, intercourse is inherently harmful to women and intentionally so, because it causes pregnancy in women.
PIV is a man mounting on a woman to thrust a large member of himself into her most intimate parts, often forcing her to be entirely naked, banging himself against her with the whole weight of his body and hips, shaking her like he would stuff a corpse, then using her insides as a receptacle for his penile dejection.
Through an all-pervasive and powerful male propaganda, they stuff our minds from infancy with the idea that PIV is normal, desirable and erotic, before we can even conceive of it as something horrifying, and make sure we never see any alternative to their lie – or that if we do, we can no longer take in the information, are punished for thinking and saying otherwise.Overestimating male competence here.
Lets say that Stonehenge was, in fact, made completely brand new in the 1890s-1900s. That might be a little disappointing on some level but it would not actually challenge my worldview much at all. A large amount of British national identity and history is basically made up wholecloth. It definitely wouldn't change how I think of my government or my country at all.
Now, the convincing evidence that seems to indicate a deep-rooted set of individuals engaging in child abuse at the heart of government, and the complicity of the national security agencies in covering that up? The fact it seems to have been an 'open secret' amongst the tory cabinet of the 1980s. That fucking Jimmy Saville, beloved children's entertainer and national treasure, was in fact some sort of horrifying paedophile rapist gangster?
These are things which actually surprised me and shocked my worldview when they were revealed. Who gives a shit about a pile of rocks when the rotten core of our very way of life has been so gruesomely exposed? We British were supposed to be better than that. Decency and respectability were supposed to be important to us, especially in our public servants.
So, no. You're looking for your 'forgeries' in the wrong places. The lies that form the basis of our society are much bigger ones than 'Stonehenge was made by ancient people'.
They are lies like:
"All are equal before the eyes of the law."
"If you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to fear."
"It wouldn't happen over here."
A male feminist was going on a tirade about how we should all use "she" as the default pronoun when we don't know the gender of a party to stick it to the patriarchy. When I disagreed, the words "you can't know what it's like to be a woman in this society" came out of his mouth. At me.Ouch.
There were no survivors.
Thanks! The figuring out a way to pluralise and add tenses to GRIN was tough.
You might even say an intense process.
But that would be puning, and therefore punishable.
... I think it's punny anyway.
I really gotta stop now.
Connection is Colorado. Which legalized weed. Then pretend you work for Fox News. The outcome would be the post.Ah, thanks. I get it now.
j/k?I assumed that much, I just don't get the joke.
This is what happens when you legalize marijuana in ColoradoI don't understand the connection between your post and the story in the link.
Something's wrong with my butt.Nurture it and it will grow.