Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Dance, monkey, dance!
You aren't very good at reading social cues are you?
Also, let's think about this. In this paper, about MEDICAL marijuana, they are claiming that marijuana is a substitute for alcohol. (which frankly is bullshit but lets set that aside for a minute).
You claim it's bullshit, and let's not set that aside.
Let's see some facts to back up that claim. The paper that you tried to shit on for being provisional (yet you can't point out any flaws in it) isn't the first to collect evidence to support the idea that people drink less when they have greater access to marijuana:
http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/16066359.2012.733465
http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/6/1/35
That this would reduce the amount of alcohol-related fatalities and traffic incidents isn't exactly rocket surgery. Looks like greater access to marijuana DOES reduce social costs but you can't bear to admit it because you're a dogmatic idiot who has tied your ego to being right, not doing what's best for society.
Bump.
I mean, a link to a bill would totally give out his mother's maiden name, his SSN, his street address, and his favorite mixed drink.
Yep, especially the two co-sponsors of the bill who flipped and voted against it.
Link, please.
Gerzofsky, one of the Committee chairs, and Lajoie were two of the 35 co-sponsors of the bill. They both ended up voting against it.
That's not a link. I'd like to see what amendments and riders were added and when.
Google. I'm not linking you to the site for the bill because it would provide easy access to personal information I'd rather not have easily accessible from this site.
Also, let's think about this. In this paper, about MEDICAL marijuana, they are claiming that marijuana is a substitute for alcohol. (which frankly is bullshit but lets set that aside for a minute).
You claim it's bullshit, and let's not set that aside.
Let's see some facts to back up that claim. The paper that you tried to shit on for being provisional (yet you can't point out any flaws in it) isn't the first to collect evidence to support the idea that people drink less when they have greater access to marijuana:
http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/16066359.2012.733465
http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/6/1/35
That this would reduce the amount of alcohol-related fatalities and traffic incidents isn't exactly rocket surgery. Looks like greater access to marijuana DOES reduce social costs but you can't bear to admit it because you're a dogmatic idiot who has tied your ego to being right, not doing what's best for society.
Bump.
Stop posting facts here, Net, they have no place in a thread like this
Also, let's think about this. In this paper, about MEDICAL marijuana, they are claiming that marijuana is a substitute for alcohol. (which frankly is bullshit but lets set that aside for a minute).
You claim it's bullshit, and let's not set that aside.
Let's see some facts to back up that claim. The paper that you tried to shit on for being provisional (yet you can't point out any flaws in it) isn't the first to collect evidence to support the idea that people drink less when they have greater access to marijuana:
http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/16066359.2012.733465
http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/6/1/35
That this would reduce the amount of alcohol-related fatalities and traffic incidents isn't exactly rocket surgery. Looks like greater access to marijuana DOES reduce social costs but you can't bear to admit it because you're a dogmatic idiot who has tied your ego to being right, not doing what's best for society.
Also, let's think about this. In this paper, about MEDICAL marijuana, they are claiming that marijuana is a substitute for alcohol. (which frankly is bullshit but lets set that aside for a minute).
You claim it's bullshit, and let's not set that aside.
Let's see some facts to back up that claim. The paper that you tried to shit on for being provisional (yet you can't point out any flaws in it) isn't the first to collect evidence to support the idea that people drink less when they have greater access to marijuana:
http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/16066359.2012.733465
http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/6/1/35
That this would reduce the amount of alcohol-related fatalities and traffic incidents isn't exactly rocket surgery. Looks like greater access to marijuana DOES reduce social costs but you can't bear to admit it because you're a dogmatic idiot who has tied your ego to being right, not doing what's best for society.
I thought you'd try to distract away from the above quote, RWHN.
Perhaps it was also posted too close to one of Telarus' comments, which in threads like this, tend to have content that must be highly embarrassing to the last shreds of intellectual honesty you retain.
I see that what you meant to say was that your unsubstantiated opinion on social costs "frankly is bullshit."
Got it.
He doesn't really do the middle ground thing. Just so you know.
Ohhh. One of THOSE.
Also, let's think about this. In this paper, about MEDICAL marijuana, they are claiming that marijuana is a substitute for alcohol. (which frankly is bullshit but lets set that aside for a minute).
You claim it's bullshit, and let's not set that aside.
Let's see some facts to back up that claim. The paper that you tried to shit on for being provisional (yet you can't point out any flaws in it) isn't the first to collect evidence to support the idea that people drink less when they have greater access to marijuana:
http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/16066359.2012.733465
http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/6/1/35
That this would reduce the amount of alcohol-related fatalities and traffic incidents isn't exactly rocket surgery. Looks like greater access to marijuana DOES reduce social costs but you can't bear to admit it because you're a dogmatic idiot who has tied your ego to being right, not doing what's best for society.
I thought you'd try to distract away from the above quote, RWHN.
Perhaps it was also posted too close to one of Telarus' comments, which in threads like this, tend to have content that must be highly embarrassing to the last shreds of intellectual honesty you retain.
Speaking of art, Portland's latest thing is going to the art museum naked. June 8th, Portland Art Museum is partnering with the Naked Bike Ride by offering admission at a cost of $1 per article of clothing.
I'm going to go, because when will I ever have another opportunity to go to an art museum naked with a bunch of other naked people?
THIS.
http://www.mattbors.com/blog/2013/05/09/millenials-arent-lazy-theyre-fucked/
I think that the real message to be gleaned from this is one that particular millennial let fly right over his woefully self-obsessed head, even though he mentioned his mother having to work for minimum wage (and then promptly forgot about all the older people who are facing a reality of working for shit pay with no benefits until the day they fall ill and die): EVERYBODY'S fucked.
This is not a gen-Y problem. This is an everybody problem. It's just that the people who are young adults now have the free time and energy to potentially change things, while older people who have kids and possibly mortgages are locked into a daily survival grind that leaves little time for changing society. That closing cartoon kind of sums it up, in a way he probably didn't intend it to; parents and children competing for the same shitty jobs with shitty pay, but the parents are the ones providing the "home" to move back to so they don't have a lot left to give to the cause of making shit better. Meanwhile, unemployed 20-somethings who are living at home have an opportunity to make some change with all that free time.
Time to start beheading the aristocracy, kids.
So fucking quit whining and get on it, son.
I can vividly imagine RWHN covering his eyes with his hands when he next visits this thread and yelling "LA LA LA I CAN'T SEE YOU!" when he gets to the part where his uneducated ideals are methodically and scientifically broken down yet again.
I got your cookies, thought I posted about them, and just realized I the post did not go through.
They were outstanding! Every last one of them, except the waffle which I failed to refrigerate before mold set in.
My baby's momma closed our child support case after you sent those, so Oregon has stopped directly taking it out of my pay and then NOT sending it to baby's momma in California.
So she'll always get the money now because it's coming direct from me rather than getting "lost" between state governments.
We've been having adventures in child support over here, too. Glad to know yours is working out!
FOR SCIENCE, do you remember which waffle had the mold problem, and when it set in? I'm hoping to improve the shelf-stability for the inevitable next time I go crazy and bake.
