Alphapance channels crowley itt!
'sup, my privileged, cishet shitlords? I'm back from oppressing womyn and PoC.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I wouldn't trust any of them, but if you read two or more of them you see the inconsistencies in the stories or the details that the others leave out.
When I was in high school the religion-in-schools debate du jour was about whether or not its legal to hang the 10 commandments on the wall. I was in favor of it. Because as soon as that's legal and protected by law, they have to protect the Pentabarf and the Satanic Commandments.
Except that you and I know it doesn't actually work that way.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/document-points-to-nixon-in-my-lai-cover-up-attempt/QuoteThis past week marked the 46th anniversary of the My Lai massacre, in which 504 unarmed Vietnamese civilians were massacred by U.S. troops in 1968. It's one of the most shameful chapters in American military history, and now documents held at the Nixon Presidential Library paint a disturbing picture of what happened inside the Nixon administration after news of the massacre broke.
The documents, mostly hand-written notes from Nixon's meetings with his chief of staff H.R. "Bob" Haldeman, lead some historians to conclude that President Richard Nixon was behind the attempt to sabotage the My Lai trials and cover up what was becoming a public-relations disaster for his administration.
One document, scribbled by Haldeman during his Dec. 1, 1969, meeting with Nixon, reads like a threatening to-do list under the headline "Task force - My Lai." Haldeman wrote "dirty tricks" (with the clarification that those tricks be "not too high a level") and "discredit one witness," in order to "keep working on the problem."
It depends on how sincere you are.If i weren't sincere about doing a discordian ritual, i would make up some ridiculous nonsense in order to take the piss out of them.
Obvious, but needed to be said.
Also, do you really want to do a ritual designed to get the Goddess of Strife to notice you?
If I were sincere about doing a discordian ritual, i would make up some ridiculous nonsense in order to -WHOOPS I'VE GONE CROSSEYED
If you want to approach arguing, from a win/lose perspective, then it makes more sense to me to turn the traditional paradigm on it's head.I hadn't considered that losing was an option in an argument. And i also hadn't considered the ego/threat response.
We're arguing, you convince me I'm wrong - I win (I've just received a software upgrade)
I convince you that you're wrong - You win
Unfortunately, it rarely works out that way on account of primate ego/threat response
Consider that considered and nwo i consider your reversed perspective superior.