« on: April 03, 2014, 11:24:17 pm »
I live and breathe qualitative analysis of discourse of schizophrenics while trying to not go insane.
Im not sure how that last part is working out though
Oh my, wow.
I mean, analyzing their speech patterns is certainly bound to be useful, but fuuuuck.
@Nigels: Idk if its language barrier thing, but i have doubts that "analyzing speech patterns" is the same as "qualitative analysis of discourse"... so i looked in the web for "speech pattern" and an article of "how to spot psychopaths: speech patterns blah blah..." came up, so im going to copy paste the methodology parts to make a comparison:
The researchers interviewed 52 convicted murderers, 14 of them ranked as psychopaths according to the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, a 20-item assessment, and asked them to describe their crimes in detail. Using computer programs to analyze what the men said, the researchers found that those with psychopathic scores showed a lack of emotion, spoke in terms of cause-and-effect when describing their crimes, and focused their attention on basic needs, such as food, drink and money.
Well, i will use a computer program, but thats 2nd step (and used as support, i could do it by hand), and it doesnt do any analyzing... i mark fragments by my own analytical categories, and the program just dumps upon request whatever markings i already from a specific category (f.e. discrimination or biography or delusion, etc.)
"Lack of emotion" is a qualitative condition, i dont see how a computer would show that... "cause-and-effect" is algo qualitative... focus on basic needs is also qualitative.
So, so far the automated and quantitative parts are not spoken about, and they probably are doing the same thing as I'm doing.
While we all have conscious control over some words we use, particularly nouns and verbs, this is not the case for the majority of the words we use, including little, functional words like "to" and "the" or the tense we use for our verbs, according to Jeffrey Hancock, the lead researcher and an associate professor in communications at Cornell University, who discussed the work on Monday (Oct. 17) in Midtown Manhattan at Cornell's ILR Conference Center.
Now, this part sounds more automated, the counting of use of "functional words" which i dont do at all and is quite quantitative... this is a first divergence.
How words give them away
To examine the emotional content of the murderers' speech, Hancock and his colleagues looked at a number of factors, including how frequently they described their crimes using the past tense. The use of the past tense can be an indicator of psychological detachment, and the researchers found that the psychopaths used it more than the present tense when compared with the nonpsychopaths. They also found more dysfluencies — the "uhs" and "ums" that interrupt speech — among psychopaths. Nearly universal in speech, dysfluencies indicate that the speaker needs some time to think about what they are saying.
With regard to psychopaths, "We think the 'uhs' and 'ums' are about putting the mask of sanity on," Hancock told LiveScience.
Psychopaths appear to view the world and others instrumentally, as theirs for the taking, the team, which also included Stephen Porter from the University of British Columbia, wrote.
As they expected, the psychopaths' language contained more words known as subordinating conjunctions. These words, including "because" and "so that," are associated with cause-and-effect statements.
"This pattern suggested that psychopaths were more likely to view the crime as the logical outcome of a plan (something that 'had' to be done to achieve a goal)," the authors write.
And finally, while most of us respond to higher-level needs, such as family, religion or spirituality, and self-esteem, psychopaths remain occupied with those needs associated with a more basic existence.
Frequency... frequency of a phrase or word i do also take into account, but our timelines are of entire years, while for the psychopaths its done in i suppose at most 3 sessions...
Use of "subordinating conjunctions"... thats totally automated and quantitative, as ive said, i dont count or analyze, im more focused on content rather than "language sequences".
Their analysis revealed that psychopaths used about twice as many words related to basic physiological needs and self-preservation, including eating, drinking and monetary resources than the nonpsychopaths, they write.
By comparison, the nonpsychopathic murderers talked more about spirituality and religion and family, reflecting what nonpsychopathic people would think about when they just committed a murder, Hancock said.
The researchers are interested in analyzing what people write on Facebook or in other social media, since our unconscious mind also holds sway over what we write. By analyzing stories written by students from Cornell and the University of British Columbia, and looking at how the text people generate using social media relates to scores on the Self-Report Psychopathy scale. Unlike the checklist, which is based on an extensive review of the case file and an interview, the self report is completed by the person in question.
This sort of tool could be very useful for law enforcement investigations, such as in the case of the Long Island serial killer, who is being sought for the murders of at least four prostitutes and possibly others, since this killer used the online classified site Craigslist to contact victims, according to Hancock.
Text analysis software could be used to conduct a "first pass," focusing the work for human investigators, he said. "A lot of time analysts tell you they feel they are drinking from a fire hose."
Knowing a suspect is a psychopath can affect how law enforcement conducts investigations and interrogations, Hancock said.
And this last part i just left in because its interesting, not any point attached to it.
So with this basic and general differentiations with what i do and speech patterns, i can go more into detail as to what i actually do.