News:

I hope she gets diverticulitis and all her poop kills her.

Main Menu

the matrix is solved

Started by DaMan, April 23, 2007, 05:07:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mangrove

www.johnhorgan.org

Check out 'rational mysticism'.

Really interesting book, lots of discussion of DMT, Ayahuasca, 'mystical states' (so called) from a scientific perspective with a wide range of opinions. Might be useful to people with BIP thoughts. Definitely more useful than watching the friggin' Matrix again.
What makes it so? Making it so is what makes it so.

Cain

Actually, the Matrix can work.  But only if you apply it specifically, to culture, as a phenomenon.  And they were beaten to the punch thirty five years ago, by Debord and Vangiem.  And it took three films to make that point.

Once again, PKD pwns all.

Shibboleet The Annihilator

Quote from: SillyCybin on April 27, 2007, 08:24:51 PM
Quote from: LMNO on April 27, 2007, 06:31:10 PM
Well, like LSD, don't you have to be mentally prepped for it?

Surely acid is much funnier if you're not?

I wasn't mentally prepped and I was fine when I did it. I was much younger, but I imagine what sort of person you are is a factor too.

Cain

Quote from: Mangrove on April 30, 2007, 04:18:56 PM
www.johnhorgan.org

Check out 'rational mysticism'.

Really interesting book, lots of discussion of DMT, Ayahuasca, 'mystical states' (so called) from a scientific perspective with a wide range of opinions. Might be useful to people with BIP thoughts. Definitely more useful than watching the friggin' Matrix again.

He shares the exact same name of my Terrorism Studies professor.

Mangrove

Quote from: Ten Ton Mantis on April 30, 2007, 04:54:15 PM
Quote from: SillyCybin on April 27, 2007, 08:24:51 PM
Quote from: LMNO on April 27, 2007, 06:31:10 PM
Well, like LSD, don't you have to be mentally prepped for it?

Surely acid is much funnier if you're not?

I wasn't mentally prepped and I was fine when I did it. I was much younger, but I imagine what sort of person you are is a factor too.

I've just started 'DMT The Spirit Molecule' by Rick Strassman. In relation to taking psychedelics, he talks about 'Set', 'Setting' and 'the drug itself'.

Basically: Set is 'you', setting is the context or situation in which you take the drug, including the people you're hanging out with and then obviously, the effects of whatever it is you're taking. He feels that the outcome of any trip is a mixture of the above.

He gives examples along the lines that, if you're taking LSD as part of a controlled lab experiment, do you feel different than someone who is taking it in a crappy apartment? If you think LSD is only good for treating psychotics, you may feel differently about it to someone who believes it's useful for accessing spiritual states.

If you are an LSD researcher, are you a 'scientist' or a 'shaman'? etc.
What makes it so? Making it so is what makes it so.

LMNO

Mang: please cross reference with Dr Leary's "MindsSet, Setting and Dosage" instructions from early in the day.




Leary was a smart guy, before he became famous.

Mangrove

Quote from: LMNO on April 30, 2007, 05:09:17 PM
Mang: please cross reference with Dr Leary's "MindsSet, Setting and Dosage" instructions from early in the day.




Leary was a smart guy, before he became famous.

will do.

rick strassman kind of blames leary for the sudden demise in psychedelic research in 1970.
What makes it so? Making it so is what makes it so.

Cramulus

Quote from: Mangrove on April 30, 2007, 05:05:15 PM
I've just started 'DMT The Spirit Molecule' by Rick Strassman. In relation to taking psychedelics, he talks about 'Set', 'Setting' and 'the drug itself'.

Basically: Set is 'you', setting is the context or situation in which you take the drug, including the people you're hanging out with and then obviously, the effects of whatever it is you're taking. He feels that the outcome of any trip is a mixture of the above.

He gives examples along the lines that, if you're taking LSD as part of a controlled lab experiment, do you feel different than someone who is taking it in a crappy apartment? If you think LSD is only good for treating psychotics, you may feel differently about it to someone who believes it's useful for accessing spiritual states.

If you are an LSD researcher, are you a 'scientist' or a 'shaman'? etc.

Give us a book report on The Spirit Molecule when you're done.

I was always fascinated by the subjective nature of drug experience. Like some people use LSD and psychedelics as a gateway to self discovery. Others use it to giggle at silly things for six hours at a time. Some people can have sex while tripping, some cannot. I find that even the length of the trip is heavily influenced by social context and expectations. (it's hard to tell when you're finally down, you know?)

I get frustrated because I have one friend, who used to trip quite often, and is insistent that its delusional idolatry to think about a drug trip as a path to illumination. Well sure man, that's true for you.


The scientist / shaman question is a good one. I think that scientists and shamans have similar societal roles, (creating a framework for reality, sort of) so I guess it depends on which societal sect they're participating in.


Mangrove

Prof Cram - i think you would like the horgan book.

the postmodernist's take on psychedelics is: 'you're not experiencing god....you're just experiencing a drug'.

ok...when i'm done with the DMT book, i'll give an overview.
What makes it so? Making it so is what makes it so.

LMNO

Quote from: Mangrove on April 30, 2007, 05:16:28 PM
Quote from: LMNO on April 30, 2007, 05:09:17 PM
Mang: please cross reference with Dr Leary's "MindsSet, Setting and Dosage" instructions from early in the day.




Leary was a smart guy, before he became famous.

will do.

rick strassman kind of blames leary for the sudden demise in psychedelic research in 1970.

Well, he sort of did, but he was kind of railroaded when he testified before congress about LSD.  He said that it should be regulated by medical professionals as a prescription drug/treatment, but it was blown out of proportion as him saying it was dangerous.

And then he sort of went off the rails with Alan Watts and Ken Kesey.

Mangrove

Quote from: LMNO on April 30, 2007, 05:22:38 PM
Quote from: Mangrove on April 30, 2007, 05:16:28 PM
Quote from: LMNO on April 30, 2007, 05:09:17 PM
Mang: please cross reference with Dr Leary's "MindsSet, Setting and Dosage" instructions from early in the day.




Leary was a smart guy, before he became famous.

will do.

rick strassman kind of blames leary for the sudden demise in psychedelic research in 1970.

Well, he sort of did, but he was kind of railroaded when he testified before congress about LSD.  He said that it should be regulated by medical professionals as a prescription drug/treatment, but it was blown out of proportion as him saying it was dangerous.

And then he sort of went off the rails with Alan Watts and Ken Kesey.

gotcha. strassman said that psychedelic research (esp. DMT) underwent a rapid and warped evolution that went:

Hey, this is an extraordinary insight into consciousness ----> Oohh Groovy trips, man ---> OMG LSD WILL KILL US ALL ----> Banninated (1970) ----> Bye Bye Research.
What makes it so? Making it so is what makes it so.

LMNO

Yeah, that's how I learned the history, too.

Mangrove

i'm finally reading up on psychedelics, having ignored it for years.
What makes it so? Making it so is what makes it so.

cyberus

Wait until you get to the bit where you read the people's narratives about their experiences, there's some pretty awesome stories in there.  I also like his theory about a release of DMT in the brain as an explaination for UFO abduction experiences.
The bun-sellers or cake-makers were in nothing inclinable to their request; but,which was worse,did injure them most outrageously,called them prattling gabblers,lickorous gluttons,freckled bittors,mangy rascals,shite-a-bed scoundrels,drunken roysters,sly knaves,drowsy loiterers,slapsauce fellows,slabberdegullion druggels,lubberly louts,cozening foxes,ruffian rogues,paltry customers,sycophant-varlets,drawlatch hoydens,flouting milksops,jeering companions,staring clowns,forlorn snakes,ninny lobcocks,scurvy sneaksbies,fondling fops,base loons,saucy coxcombs,idle lusks,scoffing braggarts,noddy meacocks,blockish grutnols,doddipol-joltheads,jobbernol goosecaps,foolish loggerheads,flutch calf-lollies,grouthead gnat-snappers,lob-dotterels,gaping changelings,codshead loobies,woodcock slangams,ninny-hammer flycatchers,noddypeak simpletons,turdy gut,shitten shepherds,and other suchlike defamatory epithets; saying further,that it was not for them to eat of these dainty cakes...

Cain

Quote from: cyberus on April 30, 2007, 06:40:34 PM
Wait until you get to the bit where you read the people's narratives about their experiences, there's some pretty awesome stories in there.  I also like his theory about a release of DMT in the brain as an explaination for UFO abduction experiences.

I'd always seen sleep paralysis as the suggestion for that.  Having suffered it myself once, I can totally understand why people would think of abduction after it.