Property of mission control (the end.) 8

[AFK]

Chances are that you have seen a lightsaber at one time or another, whether on the evening news or down at the local cantina. Therefore you know that a lightsaber is an amazing and versatile device that is able to cut through nearly anything in a matter of milliseconds.

A lightsaber is a unique device, created by hand -- the controls will be slightly different on each individual lightsaber that you buy. But all lightsabers share the same general characteristics. If you were ever to pick up and examine a typical lightsaber, here are several things that you would immediately notice:

As the dirt-filled air makes its way to the exhaust port, it passes through the vacuum-cleaner bag. These bags are made of porous woven material (typically cloth or paper), which acts as an air filter. The tiny holes in the bag are large enough to let air particles pass by, but too small for most dirt particles to fit through. Thus, when the air current streams into the bag, all the air moves on through the material, but the dirt and debris collect in the bag.

The procedure is done while the patient is under general anesthesia (unconscious and pain-free). It may be done with invasive, open surgery or laparoscopically (several small incisions).  The type of approach used depends upon what other procedure needs to be performed. In general, the incision is made in the abdomen, and the bowel resection or repair is performed as needed.

Experts point out lots of areas that need improvement, but as you can probably tell from the list of safeguards above, the memory card is considered to be the weakest point in the system. Princeton University computer-science professor Edward Felton and a couple of his graduate students got themselves one of the most common voting machines -- a Diebold AccuVote-TS -- and had their way with it. They picked the lock blocking access to the memory card and replaced it with a memory card they had infected with a virus. The virus altered the votes cast on the machine in a way that would be undetectable to election officials, because the vote numbers were not only changed on the memory card, but also in all of the backup logs on the machine's hard disk. So the final numbers matched up just fine. Another report, this one by a computer science professor who is also an election volunteer, states that the security tape protected the memory card slot looks almost exactly the same after someone removes it and then replaces it -- you have to hold the machine at a certain angle in the light to see the "VOID" imprint that arises after tampering.

[Cramulus]

 

[LMNO]

[AFK]

[The Good Reverend Roger]

                                                           WHY?
Tuberculosis, Why have I written this word? Who knows, I'm sure I had a reason
though. Reasons are kind of hard to identify, since once they have accomplished what
they wanted done, they often disappear. Where does reason go once it's gone? What is
the reasoning behind that statement? I don't really have a reason, unless it's hiding from
me, reasons like to hide like young children sometimes. Sometimes I think other people
find reason behind reasonless statements, that is of course unless other people are better
equipped to understand the impulse behind making a statement then its originator was.
At any rate the caverns of doubt are deep indeed. Who knows anything? Who knows?
there is any thing outside oneself to judge by? Who even knows there is an individual self
to have these thoughts? One does not know, one can not know. One can guess, and one
can make assumptions. All assumptions are equally irrelevant, since they can't be known
to be true. Since nothing is known true to judge truth by, or even weather anything can be
said true or false. All one can know is that things appear certain ways, it appears that one
must do certain things, and than one will eventually appear to cease being at all. It also
appears that all things one can do between realizing one "IS" and finally not being
anymore is really irrelevant, because at best one can make a temporary impression on
others, and worst no impression on other or the world. Sine existence is without meaning
and quite absurd, since we can not know anything about it or if we exist at all, why not
think and do what you want to think and do, even if other believe this behavior is absurd?
If life appears absurd, why not be absurd yourself? We as apparently existing being,
whatever that entails, seem to enjoy the concept of freedom. If we act according to how
others, peers, society, religions, and corporations, to name a few want us to behave,
eventually we think the way they want us to think. In my opinion allowing others to
control what you think and do, doesn't fit the accepted definition of freedom. Worse yet,
we pay these others to enslave us, with money, which we only agree is valuable, but is
earned by sacrificing time. Time is the one thing we do not appear to have to spare. It
appears we have a limit of time between birth and death, to express and experience
freedom of thought and action. I for one find it a terrible waste to sell away our time, the
essence of our life, in order to by suppression of our freedom. Surly we must be a sorry
lot indeed, so confused by the complexity of finding a reason for existence that we are
easily duped by anyone who come along with a simple answer. We eagerly accept these
answers which call for us to buy products from corporations, get jobs to support the
government, and give our time and money to churches. You may be asking, "Why do we
accept these answers that cause more harm than good?" The simple answer is that most
people do not like to think, furthermore, most people can't bear having to tackle an
unsolvable problem. When some one come along and hands out a simple answer, like buy
cola or God created the world; people accept it, without question. They accept these
answers because not knowing an answer makes then feel confused and hopeless. When
an answer comes along they gain hope, "I now know I exist to drink cola", or in more cases
"I exist to praise God". So, either things exist or they don't may be both or neither, who
knows. The point is, if you always keep the question open and make up your own ideas,
you have bought your life and freedom for yourself. If on the other hand, you put full
belief in others ideas, you have closed the issue of existence and sold away your life and
freedom to others.





Short Essay, in which I Refer to Humankind as Man, for Simplicity
(A strong Anti-defamation current takes hold of the mind)
   Man has been granted by virtue of unknown circumstances to exist, as being
which can know the world, in which you inhabit. Your specific pattern interacts with
other patterns in a way that allows you knowledge of the world. Nothing else in all
known existence can comprehend the relationship between things as man is ably to.
Surely, you say, some other things may obtain knowledge, plants store information in
genetic codes, and evolve, and animals react to stimulus and thus both attain knowledge.
Though this appears true, would you not agree that even the most similar animals to man,
would envy man's ability to know? Also, by whose knowledge is the ability of other
things to know, attained? Only by a man using his ability to reason using knowledge, can
the idea of, animals having knowledge be attained. It appears that man is the one thing,
out of all other things in the universe that can attain knowledge, or at the least, the one
thing that can best attain and use knowledge. Man has come to exist briefly as the being
most capable of attaining knowledge. Oh, but knowledge is a heavy burden for man, for
with every new piece of knowledge comes a new responsibility. Thus you have created
and lived by the creed "Ignorance is bliss." What do I want with knowledge, if I am
"happier" without it, you say. I must convey to you that happiness is not the goal of man,
instead you should concern yourself with growth and survival. All living things must
process information to survive, plants do this by genetic mutation, and passive natural
selection. Animals process information by mutation, natural selection, and by the ability
to adapt to new situations. Man processes the information needed to evolve through
adaptation through knowledge. Man needed light and worth, knowledge of fire allowed
the adaptation of fire usage. When man was unable to move his possessions around fast
enough to meet his needs, knowledge developed the wheel. Man has develop many kinds
of knowledge over time, this knowledge allows him to live in the changing world.
Knowledge then provides growth and development of man. It is that man knows much
about the world he lives, and has over come its obstacles, but in the process he has
gained power. You have become lazy and corrupt with you power, you shape nature to
your design, when it is you who should shape to natures design. What you have done is
taken your knowledge and shrugged off the responsibilities that come with it. You live in
world of you create with your knowledge, under the strict laws of your knowledge.
Nature does not abide by your rules so you push it out of the way, to make way for cities,
which abide by your laws. Within these worlds of steel and concrete you build states and
have wars and politics over your artificial laws. You hide away in these worlds of
certainty and firm rules, and believe you have conquered nature. Man became lazier, and
stopped questioning the world, for man believes all the answers are held in his laws. Man
fears the unknown such that it he finds it better to feel safe and happy with fabricated
answers, rather than have to think the chaotic nature of reality. He has convinced himself
that his world is indeed the real world. In order to keep this illusion real, he must
constantly engage in activities to focus his attention on the present, and drink liquor to
forget the past. If man were to, think about the future, he would see the collapse of his
"perfectly" constructed world. Not that most folks care about the future, that doesn't directly
affect their present happiness. If man could be persuaded to care about the future, even if
simply for his own children's sake, he would see the necessity of developing a new kind
of knowledge. Knowledge not solely based of his own gratification, but of universal
understanding and the harmonious existence of all things. The first step is of course to
remove the goal of happiness, for its own sake. Then, with personal gain out of his mind,
man can begin to seek the knowledge he needs to continue his growth as an entity of
nature, instead of as a separate subset from nature. When man is in harmony with nature,
he shall find contentment beyond happiness, in all things.

Perverted thoughts about a cartoon skunk inspired this monstrosity, should we expect anything less from a Mad Goddess?
             S
The Poem
Directed, Produced and Written
By
Froclown Von Hogwasher.
Abcdefghijklmnopqr
tuvwxyz
Zyxwvut
rqponmikjihgfedcba
Qwertyuiopa
dfghjkizxcvbnm
Mnbvcxzlkjhgfd
apoiuytrewq
Qazw
xedcrfvtgbyhnuj mikolp
Plokimj unhybgtvfrcdex
wzaq
Lpmkonj ibhuvgycftxdrz
eawq
Qwae
zrdxtfcygvuhbijnokmpi
Ghfjdk
latyrueiwoqpvbcnxmz
Zmxncbvpqowieurytia
kdjfhg
Mission Control inc.



Dispersing the Curse of Greyface
   Preliminary research results show this world to be dull and full of overly rule-
crazed individuals. They must constantly follow rules; they have specific sound patterns,
which must be made when meeting or passing each other. These sounds appear as
questions concerning general knowledge of one immediate surroundings and resent
experience; instead they are merely formal distractions. My theory is that people here are
brought up not to think deeply about anything, in order to discourage each other from
thinking, it has become customary to constantly acknowledge each other verbally.
People associate with groups and challenge each other's groups over dominance in hope
that one-day only people that fit the standards of their particular group will be
encountered. Each group has its own rules and customs, which must be followed, and
many subgroups coexist in a larger group called society, which has its own rules to be
followed. All societies are said to follow the rules of basic human decency. Human
decency is abstracted from the set of all possible actions. Problems arise constantly
because subgroups tend to contain rules contrary to each other and ever the larger group
to which they are a subset. This is first evident by the fact that societies often have
different ideas about what constitutes human decency. One society says you should kill
your adulterous wife, another says this is may not be done. These societies tend to have
wars, since the members of each believe their laws to be the only laws, and wish to be the
only society. With in a single society, subgroups form, labeled things like religions and
classes. Some of these subgroups can be immigrants from other societies, who continue
to have beliefs contrary to the society in which they now live. Religions are groups who
quite arbitrarily make up rules about metaphysical realities, creation of the universe, and
supreme beings. These religions demand that followers believe their rules so strongly that
they will not accept anything that doesn't correspond with their ancient presumptions.
These subgroups are constantly at war with each other and at times even society which
fosters them. There are far too many examples of this sort of rivalry to mention here, so I
shall go on.
   Why do these people create so many rules, if rules mostly lead to violence and
mistrust? People are generally afraid of the unpredictable, they realize that rules make
things predictable. People who are afraid that the next person they meet might kill them
or be friendly. When rules are created then people know the intentions of others. The
more rules there are, more predictable the world becomes. Next people worry about what
they don't know or can't understand. People get confused and become anxious or
depressed trying to think about tough subjects like "who am I" and how did "the world
get here". Eventually religions are invented to come up with elaborate explanations for
tough questions, so that people don't have to think about them, instead they can think
about growing food or building factories. These rules were at one time helpful to people,
they got people cooperate so they could keep themselves alive.
Rules began to pose a problem, when because of these rules, societies grew and
transportation developed. Since many societies developed apart from each other and in
differing climates, they developed different rules of conduct and different religions.
When any two societies met they would either combine, war, or both. In the case of war,
the two had such differing rules that they couldn't get along, and each thought the other
must be assimilated. When they combined rules defused between the groups,
subcultures arose. Other times conquered societies became subgroups of the conquering
society. Throughout all of history the creation and interaction of arbitrary rules have
shaped this world. It is this discord that hold people together and keeps the societies
evolving. Without these rules and arguments about them, people would not be ably to
function together very well, and the societies they use for support would fail.
   I realize that all rules are simple restriction placed on individuals, so they cannot
experience the full extent of their abilities. I also know that rules are baseless and
arbitrary in any absolute sort of way. These rules only serve to create friction and escalate
violence, but that is the very basis of life on this world. Rules also separate people from
their environment, in which no other creatures follow arbitrary rules, save possibly higher
primates. People here will disagree of course, believing that ants and other simple
creatures apparently follow rules. This kind of thinking is typical of these order seeking
people, who fail to realize that each ant is doing its own thing according to its own
chemical processes, not under the rules of a higher ant. Since they are inclined to be
orderly and their lives depend on societies, which thrive off of friction, they tend to act in
mechanical ways.
   If we want these people to stop being so serious and start acting individually
without having to follow rules imposed on them, I propose that we create a subclass
which doesn't have any rules and realizes that rules have no basis in objective reality.
Religions seem to be the fastest spreading belief systems, so I propose that we start a
religion where the creator is the exact opposite of the Judeo-Christian deity who is
currently predominate. If we can get people to believe in a deity which is unstable,
unpredictable and completely of the natural world, it will contradict the stable, rule
crazed, supernatural God that is popular at this time period. (We should make this deity
female for good measure, I suggest Discordia from Roman myth). We should point out
all the unruly occurrences in nature and suggest that the nature only appears orderly from
certain perspectives. For example, the ants appear orderly yet on an individual level act
disorderly. I think that people, who identify with these ideas, will see the world as
disorderly, and will realize that the rules they follow in everyday life restrict them from
their true nature. After reading more closely one will realize that order seems to exist in
reality, but so does disorder. They will also realize that neither principle really exist at all,
rather, perspective dictates perception of order and disorder. From this point people will be free to make laws and ignore them if they like. If other people do not agree with their laws they will understand and allow them to disagree. Individuals become free to choose what they would like to do from all possible actions. No longer restricted by rules of how people should behave, being human is no longer a criminal offence.
You Figure It Out
   Much unlike the seven who entered unharmed, the five whom divided by the
remainder have left the scene under water. The next time we have Flamingos of gold,
lumbering out of lemonade stands, the walrus will get it. Furthermore, we of the nine, do
not appreciate the yodeling mimes driving golf ball into our fruitcakes. Now then, the
hour has struck and the momentum is quite large, So let's all send in those taco salads.
Never-mind the four, they are on vacation, and must be disturbed by apple wielding salt
lickers. The two are the ends to which no means are possible. Lets all give three cheers
for three, and then one for each. The six, which arise from this, must be imprisoned in a
box of hedgehogs, for a week. Now that that is out of the way, the next remark will be
most serious, and important.



The End.
   In the End was the beginning. In the beginning...? Who knows, there hasn't even been an
end yet, so the beginning hasn't happened yet. Before we go about describing what
happened at the beginning we had best wait until it occurs. Since, the beginning hasn't
happened yet, then the present can't be happening now. So nothing I just wrote has
happened yet, not until after it ends, and can therefore begin, to start with. Having not
actually begun yet, this text can not have an end, that is until it begins, which will be
directly after it ends, which it can't do, having not begun yet.

It's shit like this that makes me hit the "mark all as read" button.

TGRR,
Hates dada, and hates you.  Give me my 5 minutes back, you fucking bastard.

[Fredfredly ⊂(◉‿◉)つ]

                                                           WHY?
Tuberculosis, Why have I written this word? Who knows, I'm sure I had a reason
though. Reasons are kind of hard to identify, since once they have accomplished what
they wanted done, they often disappear. Where does reason go once it's gone? What is
the reasoning behind that statement? I don't really have a reason, unless it's hiding from
me, reasons like to hide like young children sometimes. Sometimes I think other people
find reason behind reasonless statements, that is of course unless other people are better
equipped to understand the impulse behind making a statement then its originator was.
At any rate the caverns of doubt are deep indeed. Who knows anything? Who knows?
there is any thing outside oneself to judge by? Who even knows there is an individual self
to have these thoughts? One does not know, one can not know. One can guess, and one
can make assumptions. All assumptions are equally irrelevant, since they can't be known
to be true. Since nothing is known true to judge truth by, or even weather anything can be
said true or false. All one can know is that things appear certain ways, it appears that one
must do certain things, and than one will eventually appear to cease being at all. It also
appears that all things one can do between realizing one "IS" and finally not being
anymore is really irrelevant, because at best one can make a temporary impression on
others, and worst no impression on other or the world. Sine existence is without meaning
and quite absurd, since we can not know anything about it or if we exist at all, why not
think and do what you want to think and do, even if other believe this behavior is absurd?
If life appears absurd, why not be absurd yourself? We as apparently existing being,
whatever that entails, seem to enjoy the concept of freedom. If we act according to how
others, peers, society, religions, and corporations, to name a few want us to behave,
eventually we think the way they want us to think. In my opinion allowing others to
control what you think and do, doesn't fit the accepted definition of freedom. Worse yet,
we pay these others to enslave us, with money, which we only agree is valuable, but is
earned by sacrificing time. Time is the one thing we do not appear to have to spare. It
appears we have a limit of time between birth and death, to express and experience
freedom of thought and action. I for one find it a terrible waste to sell away our time, the
essence of our life, in order to by suppression of our freedom. Surly we must be a sorry
lot indeed, so confused by the complexity of finding a reason for existence that we are
easily duped by anyone who come along with a simple answer. We eagerly accept these
answers which call for us to buy products from corporations, get jobs to support the
government, and give our time and money to churches. You may be asking, "Why do we
accept these answers that cause more harm than good?" The simple answer is that most
people do not like to think, furthermore, most people can't bear having to tackle an
unsolvable problem. When some one come along and hands out a simple answer, like buy
cola or God created the world; people accept it, without question. They accept these
answers because not knowing an answer makes then feel confused and hopeless. When
an answer comes along they gain hope, "I now know I exist to drink cola", or in more cases
"I exist to praise God". So, either things exist or they don't may be both or neither, who
knows. The point is, if you always keep the question open and make up your own ideas,
you have bought your life and freedom for yourself. If on the other hand, you put full
belief in others ideas, you have closed the issue of existence and sold away your life and
freedom to others.





Short Essay, in which I Refer to Humankind as Man, for Simplicity
(A strong Anti-defamation current takes hold of the mind)
   Man has been granted by virtue of unknown circumstances to exist, as being
which can know the world, in which you inhabit. Your specific pattern interacts with
other patterns in a way that allows you knowledge of the world. Nothing else in all
known existence can comprehend the relationship between things as man is ably to.
Surely, you say, some other things may obtain knowledge, plants store information in
genetic codes, and evolve, and animals react to stimulus and thus both attain knowledge.
Though this appears true, would you not agree that even the most similar animals to man,
would envy man's ability to know? Also, by whose knowledge is the ability of other
things to know, attained? Only by a man using his ability to reason using knowledge, can
the idea of, animals having knowledge be attained. It appears that man is the one thing,
out of all other things in the universe that can attain knowledge, or at the least, the one
thing that can best attain and use knowledge. Man has come to exist briefly as the being
most capable of attaining knowledge. Oh, but knowledge is a heavy burden for man, for
with every new piece of knowledge comes a new responsibility. Thus you have created
and lived by the creed "Ignorance is bliss." What do I want with knowledge, if I am
"happier" without it, you say. I must convey to you that happiness is not the goal of man,
instead you should concern yourself with growth and survival. All living things must
process information to survive, plants do this by genetic mutation, and passive natural
selection. Animals process information by mutation, natural selection, and by the ability
to adapt to new situations. Man processes the information needed to evolve through
adaptation through knowledge. Man needed light and worth, knowledge of fire allowed
the adaptation of fire usage. When man was unable to move his possessions around fast
enough to meet his needs, knowledge developed the wheel. Man has develop many kinds
of knowledge over time, this knowledge allows him to live in the changing world.
Knowledge then provides growth and development of man. It is that man knows much
about the world he lives, and has over come its obstacles, but in the process he has
gained power. You have become lazy and corrupt with you power, you shape nature to
your design, when it is you who should shape to natures design. What you have done is
taken your knowledge and shrugged off the responsibilities that come with it. You live in
world of you create with your knowledge, under the strict laws of your knowledge.
Nature does not abide by your rules so you push it out of the way, to make way for cities,
which abide by your laws. Within these worlds of steel and concrete you build states and
have wars and politics over your artificial laws. You hide away in these worlds of
certainty and firm rules, and believe you have conquered nature. Man became lazier, and
stopped questioning the world, for man believes all the answers are held in his laws. Man
fears the unknown such that it he finds it better to feel safe and happy with fabricated
answers, rather than have to think the chaotic nature of reality. He has convinced himself
that his world is indeed the real world. In order to keep this illusion real, he must
constantly engage in activities to focus his attention on the present, and drink liquor to
forget the past. If man were to, think about the future, he would see the collapse of his
"perfectly" constructed world. Not that most folks care about the future, that doesn't directly
affect their present happiness. If man could be persuaded to care about the future, even if
simply for his own children's sake, he would see the necessity of developing a new kind
of knowledge. Knowledge not solely based of his own gratification, but of universal
understanding and the harmonious existence of all things. The first step is of course to
remove the goal of happiness, for its own sake. Then, with personal gain out of his mind,
man can begin to seek the knowledge he needs to continue his growth as an entity of
nature, instead of as a separate subset from nature. When man is in harmony with nature,
he shall find contentment beyond happiness, in all things.
?
Perverted thoughts about a cartoon skunk inspired this monstrosity, should we expect anything less from a Mad Goddess?
             S
The Poem
Directed, Produced and Written
By
Froclown Von Hogwasher.
Abcdefghijklmnopqr
tuvwxyz
Zyxwvut
rqponmikjihgfedcba
Qwertyuiopa
dfghjkizxcvbnm
Mnbvcxzlkjhgfd
apoiuytrewq
Qazw
xedcrfvtgbyhnuj mikolp
Plokimj unhybgtvfrcdex
wzaq
Lpmkonj ibhuvgycftxdrz
eawq
Qwae
zrdxtfcygvuhbijnokmpi
Ghfjdk
latyrueiwoqpvbcnxmz
Zmxncbvpqowieurytia
kdjfhg
Mission Control inc.



Dispersing the Curse of Greyface
   Preliminary research results show this world to be dull and full of overly rule-
crazed individuals. They must constantly follow rules; they have specific sound patterns,
which must be made when meeting or passing each other. These sounds appear as
questions concerning general knowledge of one immediate surroundings and resent
experience; instead they are merely formal distractions. My theory is that people here are
brought up not to think deeply about anything, in order to discourage each other from
thinking, it has become customary to constantly acknowledge each other verbally.
People associate with groups and challenge each other's groups over dominance in hope
that one-day only people that fit the standards of their particular group will be
encountered. Each group has its own rules and customs, which must be followed, and
many subgroups coexist in a larger group called society, which has its own rules to be
followed. All societies are said to follow the rules of basic human decency. Human
decency is abstracted from the set of all possible actions. Problems arise constantly
because subgroups tend to contain rules contrary to each other and ever the larger group
to which they are a subset. This is first evident by the fact that societies often have
different ideas about what constitutes human decency. One society says you should kill
your adulterous wife, another says this is may not be done. These societies tend to have
wars, since the members of each believe their laws to be the only laws, and wish to be the
only society. With in a single society, subgroups form, labeled things like religions and
classes. Some of these subgroups can be immigrants from other societies, who continue
to have beliefs contrary to the society in which they now live. Religions are groups who
quite arbitrarily make up rules about metaphysical realities, creation of the universe, and
supreme beings. These religions demand that followers believe their rules so strongly that
they will not accept anything that doesn't correspond with their ancient presumptions.
These subgroups are constantly at war with each other and at times even society which
fosters them. There are far too many examples of this sort of rivalry to mention here, so I
shall go on.
   Why do these people create so many rules, if rules mostly lead to violence and
mistrust? People are generally afraid of the unpredictable, they realize that rules make
things predictable. People who are afraid that the next person they meet might kill them
or be friendly. When rules are created then people know the intentions of others. The
more rules there are, more predictable the world becomes. Next people worry about what
they don't know or can't understand. People get confused and become anxious or
depressed trying to think about tough subjects like "who am I" and how did "the world
get here". Eventually religions are invented to come up with elaborate explanations for
tough questions, so that people don't have to think about them, instead they can think
about growing food or building factories. These rules were at one time helpful to people,
they got people cooperate so they could keep themselves alive.
Rules began to pose a problem, when because of these rules, societies grew and
transportation developed. Since many societies developed apart from each other and in
differing climates, they developed different rules of conduct and different religions.
When any two societies met they would either combine, war, or both. In the case of war,
the two had such differing rules that they couldn't get along, and each thought the other
must be assimilated. When they combined rules defused between the groups,
subcultures arose. Other times conquered societies became subgroups of the conquering
society. Throughout all of history the creation and interaction of arbitrary rules have
shaped this world. It is this discord that hold people together and keeps the societies
evolving. Without these rules and arguments about them, people would not be ably to
function together very well, and the societies they use for support would fail.
   I realize that all rules are simple restriction placed on individuals, so they cannot
experience the full extent of their abilities. I also know that rules are baseless and
arbitrary in any absolute sort of way. These rules only serve to create friction and escalate
violence, but that is the very basis of life on this world. Rules also separate people from
their environment, in which no other creatures follow arbitrary rules, save possibly higher
primates. People here will disagree of course, believing that ants and other simple
creatures apparently follow rules. This kind of thinking is typical of these order seeking
people, who fail to realize that each ant is doing its own thing according to its own
chemical processes, not under the rules of a higher ant. Since they are inclined to be
orderly and their lives depend on societies, which thrive off of friction, they tend to act in
mechanical ways.
   If we want these people to stop being so serious and start acting individually
without having to follow rules imposed on them, I propose that we create a subclass
which doesn't have any rules and realizes that rules have no basis in objective reality.
Religions seem to be the fastest spreading belief systems, so I propose that we start a
religion where the creator is the exact opposite of the Judeo-Christian deity who is
currently predominate. If we can get people to believe in a deity which is unstable,
unpredictable and completely of the natural world, it will contradict the stable, rule
crazed, supernatural God that is popular at this time period. (We should make this deity
female for good measure, I suggest Discordia from Roman myth). We should point out
all the unruly occurrences in nature and suggest that the nature only appears orderly from
certain perspectives. For example, the ants appear orderly yet on an individual level act
disorderly. I think that people, who identify with these ideas, will see the world as
disorderly, and will realize that the rules they follow in everyday life restrict them from
their true nature. After reading more closely one will realize that order seems to exist in
reality, but so does disorder. They will also realize that neither principle really exist at all,
rather, perspective dictates perception of order and disorder. From this point people will be free to make laws and ignore them if they like. If other people do not agree with their laws they will understand and allow them to disagree. Individuals become free to choose what they would like to do from all possible actions. No longer restricted by rules of how people should behave, being human is no longer a criminal offence.
You Figure It Out
   Much unlike the seven who entered unharmed, the five whom divided by the
remainder have left the scene under water. The next time we have Flamingos of gold,
lumbering out of lemonade stands, the walrus will get it. Furthermore, we of the nine, do
not appreciate the yodeling mimes driving golf ball into our fruitcakes. Now then, the
hour has struck and the momentum is quite large, So let's all send in those taco salads.
Never-mind the four, they are on vacation, and must be disturbed by apple wielding salt
lickers. The two are the ends to which no means are possible. Lets all give three cheers
for three, and then one for each. The six, which arise from this, must be imprisoned in a
box of hedgehogs, for a week. Now that that is out of the way, the next remark will be
most serious, and important.



The End.
   In the End was the beginning. In the beginning...? Who knows, there hasn't even been an
end yet, so the beginning hasn't happened yet. Before we go about describing what
happened at the beginning we had best wait until it occurs. Since, the beginning hasn't
happened yet, then the present can't be happening now. So nothing I just wrote has
happened yet, not until after it ends, and can therefore begin, to start with. Having not
actually begun yet, this text can not have an end, that is until it begins, which will be
directly after it ends, which it can't do, having not begun yet.

It's shit like this that makes me hit the "mark all as read" button.

TGRR,
Hates dada, and hates you.  Give me my 5 minutes back, you fucking bastard.

you actually READ IT? i stopped at turburculosis...