THE CANCER KILLING PDCOM - Blow-by-Blow Coverage of Democratic Primary Race

[Darth Cupcake]

ron paul makes me want to kill babies and cows and buckets and everything.

Fred speaks accurately.

Although, I feel the same way about Huckabee.

If only Canadia weren't so chilly and Europe weren't so hostile to giving Americans citizenship and/or asylum!

[Cramulus]

I've said it before and I'll say it again--

Wouldn't it be PROGRESSIVE for America to elect a black man or a woman?

I guess. But what would be MORE progressive would be to NOT LET RACE AND GENDER INFLUENCE YOUR DECISION.

 

[Richter]

French Foreign Legion.  You only need to serve for 8-10 years to gain citizenship.

The Democrats, despite the progresivity pandering, as mentioned by Cram, seem like the lesser wevils.
The Republican side of things worries me in a general church vs. state way.

[I_Kicked_Kennedy]

I've always thought our country would be better off if we had a nigger running the country.

[Suu]

I've always thought our country would be better off if we had a nigger running the country.

 


Werz Iowa?
\

[Darth Cupcake]

French Foreign Legion.  You only need to serve for 8-10 years to gain citizenship.

Oooh. I don't know if I can wait 8-10 years before the apocalypse happens, but we'll see.

Also, your sig makes me sad. Do not frown upon genitals!

[Suu]

I think for a country who bases our fucking foundation on "freedom" that we're the most chauvinist, racist, misogynist, and above all prude bunch of assholes on the planet.

But that's pretty well known.

You all may return to your regularly scheduled programming.

[AFK]

I've said it before and I'll say it again--

Wouldn't it be PROGRESSIVE for America to elect a black man or a woman?

I guess. But what would be MORE progressive would be to NOT LET RACE AND GENDER INFLUENCE YOUR DECISION.

 

But wouldn't it be kind of scary if the woman was, say, Elizabeth Dole and the black man was, say Clarence Thomas?  But that speaks to your second point.  Who gives a fuck about race or gender, I'd just like to see someone as President who can lead the fucking country. 

[Suu]

I've said it before and I'll say it again--

Wouldn't it be PROGRESSIVE for America to elect a black man or a woman?

I guess. But what would be MORE progressive would be to NOT LET RACE AND GENDER INFLUENCE YOUR DECISION.

 

But wouldn't it be kind of scary if the woman was, say, Elizabeth Dole and the black man was, say Clarence Thomas?  But that speaks to your second point.  Who gives a fuck about race or gender, I'd just like to see someone as President who can lead the fucking country. 

I WILL ONLY VOTE FOR A W.A.S.P. MAN!!
\


Wait...do rednecks even know what WASP means?

[AFK]

Yes, but I don't think they would ever vote for Blackie Lawless.  I know I sure as hell wouldn't. 

[Suu]

True. But SOMEONE would somewhere.

[LMNO]

Yes, but I don't think they would ever vote for Blackie Lawless.  I know I sure as hell wouldn't. 

[Triple Zero]

i just did an online test who i should vote for if i were to vote:

80% John Edwards (D)      
70% Hillary Clinton (D)      
70% Barack Obama (D)      
30% Rudy Giuliani (R)      
25% John McCain (R)      
20% Mike Huckabee (R)      
15% Fred Thompson (R)      
10% Mitt Romney (R)

most important thing i seem to disagree about with mr edwards is that i think nuclear power is a good thing, where he probably mistakenly thinks it's dangerous or something.
and the other thing about making guns harder to buy or something. not because i like guns that much, but i just don't think it'll work very well in the USA, as far as i can judge.

[Suu]

i just did an online test who i should vote for if i were to vote:

80% John Edwards (D)      
70% Hillary Clinton (D)      
70% Barack Obama (D)      
30% Rudy Giuliani (R)      
25% John McCain (R)      
20% Mike Huckabee (R)      
15% Fred Thompson (R)      
10% Mitt Romney (R)

most important thing i seem to disagree about with mr edwards is that i think nuclear power is a good thing, where he probably mistakenly thinks it's dangerous or something.
and the other thing about making guns harder to buy or something. not because i like guns that much, but i just don't think it'll work very well in the USA, as far as i can judge.

According to the Bill of Rights, we have the right to bear arms. LOL.

It just costs a lot, AND, the state you live in can alter it as they see fit.

...Or at least RI does...but we like to pretend the federal gov't doesn't exist here.

[LMNO]

http://According to the Bill of Rights, we have the right to bear arms. LOL.

It does?  I thought it gave the states a right to raise militias...