Frequently asked questions..

[Bebek Sincap Ratatosk]

This is how I know breaking the candies was the right thing to do.

Cause of things like this.

[Adios]

This is how I know breaking the candies was the right thing to do.

Cause of things like this.

From what I have picked up ITT there is no right or wrong answer because order/disorder is in the eye of the beholder.

[Bebek Sincap Ratatosk]

LMNO,
i also just was struck by you saying:

In Concepts, like Math and Physics, we can have Absolute things.  But not in the Universe we experience.

and it occurs to me that the former is a subset of the latter, no?

The former exists in our heads... the latter exists in reality.
To crib from Crowley, 1+1 is 'true', 1+1=2 is a 'lie.

[Elder Iptuous]

I claim that a Pattern is a user-created process that Filters out aspects of the Experiential Universe in order to find a "repeating metric" (to use your term).

I also claim that if you change those Filters, those aspects of the Experiential Universe are no longer a "repeating metric".

Therefore, any "repeating metric" is soley the creation of the observer.

ok....
you're saying that the pattern is the defining criteria, whereas i'm saying the pattern is the manifestation of that criteria.
both understandable uses of the words with very different implications in this context....

hmm.

[memy]

From what I have picked up ITT there is no right or wrong answer because order/disorder is in the eye of the beholder.

yep, and my eye says anything that's complicatingly fun is a right thing to do.

[AFK]

This is how I know breaking the candies was the right thing to do.

Cause of things like this.

From what I have picked up ITT there is no right or wrong answer because order/disorder is in the eye of the beholder.

eye and mind, and of course, their BIP cell. 

[Elder Iptuous]

LMNO,
i also just was struck by you saying:

In Concepts, like Math and Physics, we can have Absolute things.  But not in the Universe we experience.

and it occurs to me that the former is a subset of the latter, no?

The former exists in our heads... the latter exists in reality.
To crib from Crowley, 1+1 is 'true', 1+1=2 is a 'lie.

again... the former is a subset of the latter, no?

the line from Crowley, i don't grok.

[Adios]

This is how I know breaking the candies was the right thing to do.

Cause of things like this.

From what I have picked up ITT there is no right or wrong answer because order/disorder is in the eye of the beholder.

eye and mind, and of course, their BIP cell. 

Absolutely unavoidable. All of our perceptions are connected to our experiences.

[LMNO]

LMNO,
i also just was struck by you saying:

In Concepts, like Math and Physics, we can have Absolute things.  But not in the Universe we experience.

and it occurs to me that the former is a subset of the latter, no?

If you meant "Math is a subset of the Experiential Universe", then I ask you to point to the concept of "Zero" as it exists in the Universe we experience.

[AFK]

I claim that a Pattern is a user-created process that Filters out aspects of the Experiential Universe in order to find a "repeating metric" (to use your term).

I also claim that if you change those Filters, those aspects of the Experiential Universe are no longer a "repeating metric".

Therefore, any "repeating metric" is soley the creation of the observer.

ok....
you're saying that the pattern is the defining criteria, whereas i'm saying the pattern is the manifestation of that criteria.
both understandable uses of the words with very different implications in this context....

hmm.

The manifestation according to how you've observed and processed the manifestation.  

[LMNO]

I claim that a Pattern is a user-created process that Filters out aspects of the Experiential Universe in order to find a "repeating metric" (to use your term).

I also claim that if you change those Filters, those aspects of the Experiential Universe are no longer a "repeating metric".

Therefore, any "repeating metric" is soley the creation of the observer.

ok....
you're saying that the pattern is the defining criteria, whereas i'm saying the pattern is the manifestation of that criteria.
both understandable uses of the words with very different implications in this context....

hmm.

The manifestation according to how you've observed and processed the manifestation.  

That is to say, the manifestation after you've removed all the bits of the manifestation that don't apply to the pattern you're looking for.

[Elder Iptuous]

LMNO,
i also just was struck by you saying:

In Concepts, like Math and Physics, we can have Absolute things.  But not in the Universe we experience.

and it occurs to me that the former is a subset of the latter, no?

If you meant "Math is a subset of the Experiential Universe", then I ask you to point to the concept of "Zero" as it exists in the Universe we experience.

mu

[Bebek Sincap Ratatosk]

LMNO,
i also just was struck by you saying:

In Concepts, like Math and Physics, we can have Absolute things.  But not in the Universe we experience.

and it occurs to me that the former is a subset of the latter, no?

The former exists in our heads... the latter exists in reality.
To crib from Crowley, 1+1 is 'true', 1+1=2 is a 'lie.

again... the former is a subset of the latter, no?

the line from Crowley, i don't grok.

1 apple and 1 apple exist... labeling them as 2 apples is a mental shortcut because they are both single, unique things. Our brains just gloss over the differences and correlate the similarities.

[LMNO]

LMNO,
i also just was struck by you saying:

In Concepts, like Math and Physics, we can have Absolute things.  But not in the Universe we experience.

and it occurs to me that the former is a subset of the latter, no?

If you meant "Math is a subset of the Experiential Universe", then I ask you to point to the concept of "Zero" as it exists in the Universe we experience.

mu

[LMNO]

LMNO,
i also just was struck by you saying:

In Concepts, like Math and Physics, we can have Absolute things.  But not in the Universe we experience.

and it occurs to me that the former is a subset of the latter, no?

If you meant "Math is a subset of the Experiential Universe", then I ask you to point to the concept of "Zero" as it exists in the Universe we experience.

mu

Ok, we're getting a little punchy, here.  "mu" is "no-thing", or some such shit -- I still require you showing me where that is in the Universe.