More IANAR spagottry.

[I Am Not A Rhombus]

If that's supposed to mean something, I have no idea. This isn't ED, this isn't a chan...just...UGH. And here I'm withholding my vitriol in attempts to actually contribute to this forum for the first time in 10,000 posts instead of being a stagnant "shitty person" as you attest I am.

Of course, each individual does take what they give, you see me as a shitty person because you are, perhaps? I'm putting you on ignore for the remainder of this thread. Banter as you wish, because you're not here anymore.

-Suu
Has her right to be a fucking self-centered drama queen in her cantankerous creations as well! Rawr!

Yet a notable part of your post was admitting to be a shitty person. You are a shitty person. Deal with it.

"I am a bad person." - Mark Renton

I deal with it, why won't you?

I don't think you have, or else you would have removed yourself from a place where you could potentially interact with decent people.

[Suu]

Who said anyone on PD.com was decent? Did I miss something?

[Thurnez Isa]

IANAR
you still never answered me
why are you here still...?
dont' you have better things to do?

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Says the guy who bases opinions upon opinions

wut   

Where is this groundbreaking psychiatric evidence that Aspergers is made up?

Now is when we separate "opinion" from "fact".  It is my OPINION that assburgers is just more made up bullshit like ADHD that exists to coddle failures into thinking they're just ill. 

Hah, of course I'm not a saint. I'm just better than you, by a notable amount.

Actually, you're just a raving hypocrite. 

Have you EVER contributed anything to anyone or anything?  Or is whining ALL you do?

I'd hardly call offering my opinion on someone's opinion piece anywhere near as terrible as half the shit you say. They were admitting to be a sociopath, what was I going to say? Come on, surely even you are not that bad.

Try me.   

[NWC]

tl;dr

too busy douchebagging

[The Good Reverend Roger]

IANAR
you still never answered me
why are you here still...?
dont' you have better things to do?

ITS ASS BURGERS WON'T LET IT QUIT.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Suu, when the douchebaggery ends, I will split the thread if you like.

[Suu]

Thanks Rog, the abundance of douchitude is overwhelming.

[I Am Not A Rhombus]

Now is when we separate "opinion" from "fact".  It is my OPINION that assburgers is just more made up bullshit like ADHD that exists to coddle failures into thinking they're just ill. 

But opinions should still be based on some amount of evidence. Yours is based on absolutely none. Just about every piece of evidence goes against what you're saying. Yet you still feel the need to attack someone, or worsen your attacks based on your "Opinion"?

Actually, you're just a raving hypocrite.

How?

Have you EVER contributed anything to anyone or anything?  Or is whining ALL you do?

I have. Is acting like a faggy tough guy all you do?

[Suu]

Right, personal attacks will get you really far in life.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Thanks Rog, the abundance of douchitude is overwhelming.

No problem.  I'll just merge it into the trainwreck that the whiner started.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

But opinions should still be based on some amount of evidence.

Where is that written?  I base mine on personal observations.  Anecdotal?  Yes, but fortunately I made my living by bending peoples' thumbs the wrong way, not by publishing in a journal.

I have.

Name one thing.

[I Am Not A Rhombus]

Right, personal attacks will get you really far in life.

Apparently it works for Roger, Faust, and most of this board.

[I Am Not A Rhombus]

But opinions should still be based on some amount of evidence.

Where is that written?  I base mine on personal observations.  Anecdotal?  Yes, but fortunately I made my living by bending peoples' thumbs the wrong way, not by publishing in a journal.

Personal anecdotes are not good evidence. Your opinion is still baseless. You are not just HOLDING that opinion, you are attacking me based on it. Sure you're attacking me for other things, but this seems to be one of the main ones.

Again I am unsure how you have any ethics, at least any that make any sense.

I have.

Name one thing.
[/quote]

Why? So you can laugh at it or say how it doesn't matter, or if it's something to do with the internet, someone can use it to pull up even more personal shit?

I will mention one thing I don't think to be of consequence, I used to try and work with people with issues like autism and try and get them to develop social skills. I worked with one guy with AS who was much more infamous than me at the time and was completely unruly on forums. It was a major headache, but I kept it up for as long as I could, and I tried. I tried to reach out and help and change and improve someone.

Of course, doing one or two good things doesn't make me a good person, since I have no doubt you have one or two "Kind deeds" up your sleeves. Your values are still utterly and completely disgusting.

[hooplala]

The problem with this entire premise is that you're pretty much admitting to be a shitty person.

I don't get why some of the creatures here seem to feel the need to DEFEND the Internet's crappiness. Because it needs to be a more unfriendly place?

You're admitting to being a sociopath. You can't possibly be right. Your rant is inherently poor, because the premise is wrong.

We need more sociopaths. Sociopathy is a good thing.

What about the people that don't LIKE that? Why are you so selfish? Why do you only care about you and your gang of barely human net bullies? All you do is fuck things up for people who actually try to use the internet as a viable communication tool.

Seriously, WHY do you need to defend the Internet as a random piece of crap? It already is. You're not saying anything new. The internet is only the way it is because your attitude exist. If people like you were sent off to the loony bin we'd notice a gradual but sure improvement in just about everything.