Biblie Busting vs. Darwin Deconstructing

[Bebek Sincap Ratatosk]

Dawkins is most certainly a religious nutjob, his regular attacks on agnosticism bring this to light fairly well.  I doubt his internal process is much better when it comes to evolution.

*Has a hard time respecting anyone who uses the argument from evil as a basis for Atheism

That's what I've gotten from him as well... Science can tell us a lot about what can be observed (which surely can reduce the number of "God Did It" solutions) but it cannot tell us much about what cannot be observed. Saying "The available evidence indicates strong support for Evolution", seems, to me, a far cry from "God doesn't exist"... One seems to fit LMNO's "Science Faith" and the latter seems closer to "the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." 

[Thurnez Isa]

Dawkins is most certainly a religious nutjob, his regular attacks on agnosticism bring this to light fairly well.  I doubt his internal process is much better when it comes to evolution.

*Has a hard time respecting anyone who uses the argument from evil as a basis for Atheism

That's what I've gotten from him as well... Science can tell us a lot about what can be observed (which surely can reduce the number of "God Did It" solutions) but it cannot tell us much about what cannot be observed. Saying "The available evidence indicates strong support for Evolution", seems, to me, a far cry from "God doesn't exist"... One seems to fit LMNO's "Science Faith" and the latter seems closer to "the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." 

if everything is going along quite steadily without god
then really what use is he?
other then keeping our stupid little monkey brains from exploded cause of the thought there maybe no justice in the world

[BootyBay]

I have my own Big Bang theory

No, it has nothing to do with what you're thinking, SHUT UP.

The universe is a big cone, you see, and all of the matter settled in the point. Matter is always trying to achieve an equilibrium, but it can't, for reasons that are complicated, like relationships.

So the matter all settles in the point of the cone, and then it's all too close together and repels everything from itself, so it starts to "expand", ie migrate away from other matter. It expands and expands, and as it expands, the cone flattens, until it can flatten no more, and the matter all freaks out by how far away it all is from the other matter, and starts to contract, on the other plane of the cone. It contracts and contracts and the cone gets conier and conier, until all the matter is too close together in the tip of the cone, and then...

It's basically the same as the doughnut model, but way more fun.

I actually laughed my ass off, and have to stand up to type this.

Is this what Hawking would call a "light cone?"

[BootyBay]

Oops lol.  That was what I was thinking. (lol - I'm stoopid today)

[Reginald Ret]

I don't believe in monkeys.


/runs

[M.K]

This thread is made of fucking win. I love you guise.