20090722 5:12 AM "Wednesday" 6.9 YU
-
WeLL? it's the NEW day already?/?
= =
and i slept thru the 4AM BBC broadcast:
AS LucK would have it there is a rePETE in 1/4 hr
: : :
thUS i'LL try to see the BBC segMINT rearGUARDing NEW
whitch NEw eliment i've no clue: Time May well tell?/?
5:33 AM BBC Boundries reDRAWN ... Solar Eclips M dict
? ? ? ?
Poliyical IS 17:01 LocaL 2008? case to ex (electricity)
Nothern Boundry not clear (Grazing}? Cartoon:HaiG N?S
April 5:43 AM vertical blocks JR tech Boing:Fiet
Y%8 A?i Price cut (living in woods (ticks)=d'Z's
/TilT\
thUS my guess: it will be Blocks. Square OR rectangular?
Stackable! Will they be stacked? strewn? Or Lain out
IF lain out then doeth North ?/op South or Vice Verse
My gues is yes to both & that S will have D as in SaD
20090723 5:39 PM HisToRY Detective ManHATtan Project A~
-
has just finished (CH10) a segment about BeEs Wax in OR
= =
with mention of the SanFransisco Xavior{ (Soanish Galleon
the same ship NewMan mentions Back in the 50-70's ? ...
: : :
the cross connect with TT is the Olive Jars (etc ETC}?
whereas its all Basic Science About spectroGRAPH etc
At U/O & WSU{? i'LL attempt to find the THIRD leg ...
? ? ? ?
(TT) Time Team, (HD) History Detective, & (??) the third PROGRAM
i'LL leave my narative of what i've seen and return to MaT_Li
try to render a bees wax spectrum of my own (yes ASIAN)
not european Comprenda' CHicetta? MONEY?Money?money ?
/TilT\
20090722 9:59 PM Assent of Money?
-
followed TT? what can I say? Clouds
= =
its rather pointless: i'poise to rerun the tape
I will anyway: Maybe not all tonight. the Palm scene
: : :
anyway to many technical problems to go on very long
about shadows OR angles, or anything at all. I will
have to be content with rECtangular OR Square ...
? ? ? ?
it did appear to me that 1850's things like bottle
were rather deep So my assumption about SURface vs
shallow (6-8 in) vs deep > 1or2 Feet seams worthy
of a few lines of LI's on my part. I'll say the BO
20090723 9:50 AM AllRight:
-
WHERE Xactly should i head? MM?
= =
sba340pc31 ?
McLiB 11:24-
20090724 1:09 PM Well?
-
I do not know yet where this week is headed four?
= =
My Tower XP is in the process of ATTempting to locate it
IT Will take hours or days due2 Xp_t's content advisor?
: : : 2:46 PM {almost 3 hours later
8:00 pmTime Team America : Range Creek, Utah (Hmm}?
Jul 16, 2009, Jun 3, 2009, May 11, 2009, Jun 2, 2006
2004Jun30, June 19,1999 ...pristine..Fremont.Genetics
? ? ? ?
as far as: Mat'N it goes?/? OK it became clear Activity
THere is picking UP, the RAND seams to think its less
meaningfull as time passes. OLD data better than new? time appearently should be LogRythmic (not Linear
/TilT\
t_LI = [ 9.716 9.603 9.511 6.602 4.630 -1.619 ];
V_Uk = rand(t_LI);
stem(t_LI,V_Uk)
clear enough the difficulty is t_LI ( X-Axis Scale )
20090725 3:33 AM Fremont vs Fremont ?
-
today? for ther first time A position is taken (by myself)
= =
(um) between North (this 486/100 Win98) no external conection (antiSPY)
and the tower Xp Soon? to be connected by wireless to the WEB ( spY ) ?
: : :
WELL: perhaps not? as i see no CONNECT sign, all of the few(5) wireless
networks (in range) have very week signals, and the one i had in mind
SH for short does not even appear!(OH my): oppsi now there are 10 + Con
? ? ? ?
3:45 AM = 3:43 Xp "Time" hmmm? time to check time? {oh well later}:
4:06 AM time for BBC on tv? hmm? I get THINK TANK not BBC ?/?
4:14 AM What do I think? Batteries vs Band 4:28=4:27TVST ?/?
really i've no idea about the SO Call UTC (Xact time) maybe time is NOT
/tilt\
back to the Question of ploting time on the X (horizantal) Axis using
(Um}? this 496 (no i AM not in favor of T=X) or WiFi tax's eithor
time should scroll down OR up on the computer page Not Left to Right
OR right to left? well never mind? Back to FREE Mount ...
~bt~
it would appear ThaT the error I made was not to REMember today was
Saturday. NO BBc at 4AM OR 5:30.
8:01 AM also REMember this 486 has '98 / no web cON
.BB.
THUS i've control over my thought processes and there
are very few pop up to distract me. If things get a bit
out of place i can EASILY reformat C: & reistall '98
to clear up my concerns.
20090724 1:09 PM Well?
-
I do not know yet where this week is headed four?
= =
My Tower XP is in the process of ATTempting to locate it
IT Will take hours or days due2 Xp_t's content advisor?
: : : 2:46 PM {almost 3 hours later
8:00 pmTime Team America : Range Creek, Utah (Hmm}?
Jul 16, 2009, Jun 3, 2009, May 11, 2009, Jun 2, 2006
2004Jun30, June 19,1999 ...pristine..Fremont.Genetics
? ? ? ?
as far as: Mat'N it goes?/? OK it became clear Activity
THere is picking UP, the RAND seams to think its less
meaningfull as time passes. OLD data better than new? time appearently should be LogRythmic (not Linear
/TilT\
t_LI = [ 9.716 9.603 9.511 6.602 4.630 -1.619 ];
V_Uk = rand(t_LI);
stem(t_LI,V_Uk)
clear enough the difficulty is t_LI ( X-Axis Scale )
20090725 3:33 AM Fremont vs Fremont ?
-
today? for ther first time A position is taken (by myself)
= =
(um) between North (this 486/100 Win98) no external conection (antiSPY)
and the tower Xp Soon? to be connected by wireless to the WEB ( spY ) ?
: : :
WELL: perhaps not? as i see no CONNECT sign, all of the few(5) wireless
networks (in range) have very week signals, and the one i had in mind
SH for short does not even appear!(OH my): oppsi now there are 10 + Con
? ? ? ?
3:45 AM = 3:43 Xp "Time" hmmm? time to check time? {oh well later}:
4:06 AM time for BBC on tv? hmm? I get THINK TANK not BBC ?/?
4:14 AM What do I think? Batteries vs Band 4:28=4:27TVST ?/?
really i've no idea about the SO Call UTC (Xact time) maybe time is NOT
/tilt\
back to the Question of ploting time on the X (horizantal) Axis using
(Um}? this 496 (no i AM not in favor of T=X) or WiFi tax's eithor
time should scroll down OR up on the computer page Not Left to Right
OR right to left? well never mind? Back to FREE Mount ...
~bt~
it would appear ThaT the error I made was not to REMember today was
Saturday. NO BBc at 4AM OR 5:30.
8:01 AM also REMember this 486 has '98 / no web cON
.BB.
THUS i've control over my thought processes and there
are very few pop up to distract me. If things get a bit
out of place i can EASILY reformat C: & reistall '98
to clear up my concerns.
20090726 9:00 AM Sunday's yeah:
-
its rather the tail ... that IZ lost interest in TT
= =
neverthe less I'LL attempt to see :"WHERE": it should be
8:00 pmTime Team America : Range Creek, Utah (Fremont}?
: : :
(Um}? well? the newest bridge in this town is called ...
THE FREEMONT and there is a Freemont Street on the EAST
side of the river Near the East end (Cook as i recall}
? ? ? ?
Not that THis has anything to do with tHAT (it dont}?
it just as IV said i lost interest. ON another Front
I did see a KonK shell segment Or was it conc ?
about sunken Spanish Ships in Caribbean (Not eXsavior}}?
20090726 4:54 PM (Hmmm...}?
-
it doeth occure to me, that with the new wide screen look? that I should devise a wider line approach for D'bait
= =
this new form over substance approach does itself rais ne problems. 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 1234567
67 was the approximation of my old LiNe lengths, the new form may double that THus the 120 charcter line may be where IZ currently
: : :
Clearly I do not know: however its also very plain that some new number will for now at least, be approached? and sure it causes some concern ...
As I only see about 70 (UM}? using size 12 (switching to Courier new?
6:14 PM Hyda ? brings me to the final line of this part? watching Northwest indian news CH10.3
? ? ? ?
REMinds me of something, if only i could recall it, its sound stuff? however theres a photo involved somewhere
Nez P ... photo -| .. so you get a link for on line garbal
http://www.nwin.tvwell i dieGrass its meals per day what can i say see link
20090728 2:50 AM 100 was to many?
-
1234567890 1234567890 1234567890 1234567890 1234567890 1234567890 1234567890 1234567890
= =
using size 9 Courier New Bold ... it looks like 80 character per line (Left to Right}?
whatever the Form? the week draws quickly to its concludion ... their4 i will say ...
: : :
its been a very inactive week in general Althought Monday G_a was seen in CH 42{ at 7AM
and c_S was seen entering NAScc about1/4 till 11? M/g was seen prior to that on approach
to T's Office! For the most part however the week still gets an OVERALL rating of v.LOW.
? ? ? ?
i did see a preview segment on TV for TT at (Um} "Range Creek" {see I do REMember} where
this tail is 'poised to trail off to. FREEmont? Lemme check my non indexed Source ...
3:18 AM well if FreeMont exists there i fail to spot it. 3:28 AM nor do i find THEM?
in Encarta?
20090729 1:25 AM the big day hath arrived
-
yes: i did find mention of FreMont (Culture) the main point Maze? you know corn / irrigation
= =
however there is more to ThaT Than This: Leather Sandels (mockisons}? Clay pottery}? &&
(maybe i'LL REMember later}? the texts suggested 900 years untill about 1300AD
: : :
My take of course has no interest in CoLectables, My take is the Chemical Signatures,
I began with Leather (C) so I can begin with the lack of C14 etc, and again its not14
that i would have liked to see... its a follow up from the double peak from SC ?
? ? ? ?
WHERE was it again? yeah?yeah 7/15 :"Clovis, Topper_A & S.C. "Swamp"" ... weLL believe
WHATEVER you want I think I got it right ~" 2 peeks (1520}? those 2 peeks Carbon "
And looking for a Soil Surface (IR) date of 12,900B NOT to be confused with 1300AD
.1 Carbon .2 in Soils .3 from corn cobs is just fine by me! OR extracted from DIRT.
/TilT\
Why never no carbon extracted directly from dirt itself? They Take O2 from ICE do they
not: Oh never mind, this is about bits & pieces? what will J wear, I 4get? RElist?/?
CC AH ED CR JS JW MW JB LP BH (0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9) Thus I can now toss 'E-M' Letters
Like TT for example in Fact Fonted Letters Like these 9. Courier New BOLD he he he ::
