News:

Yeah, fuckface! Get ready to be beaten down. Grrr! Internet ain't so safe now is it motherfucker! Shit just got real! Bam!

Main Menu

Black swans and financial risk management

Started by Cain, January 26, 2009, 05:40:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cain

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/magazine/04risk-t.html

The problem, basically, is asymmetrical payoff.  99% of the time, the payoff was big, and worth the risk.  1% of the time, it caused a catastropic meltdown. 

Bebek Sincap Ratatosk

Taleb, Our Lady's Non-Prophet for the 21st Century
- I don't see race. I just see cars going around in a circle.

"Back in my day, crazy meant something. Now everyone is crazy" - Charlie Manson

LMNO

Not to besmirch NT, but there seems to have been a few other problems at hand; GIGO, insufficient data, and the map/territory thing.

After all Goldman Sachs used VaR, but they noticed something weird was happening; so they went conservative, shored up their accounts, and missed the worst of it.

In short, it wasn't completely the VaR in itself, it was also that it was used improperly.