News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

FUCK ROBERT ANTON WILSON

Started by Horab Fibslager, November 27, 2003, 07:15:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

MedeoPlusPlus

A thought:

Each and every one of us learns to speak a first language sometime in the first few years of our lives. We learn this language from parents, TV, and anyone else we come into contact with who speaks the same language, which most of them learned from similar sources at the same age. Almost every word we speak in our native tongue, or in any language that has at least one other speaker, is merely a copy of what we've heard someone else say before. And made-up words (like "fnord") are merely the end-result of complex combinations and rearrangements of existing words.

Therefore, everything that anyone says is technically quoting someone else. You can't avoid it. So why not quote people like RAW, if doing so is simply akin to learning to speak?
1. e4             e5
2. Bc4           Bc5
3. Qf3           Ne7
4. Qxf7++

Guido Finucci

Quote from: Medeo FaboverdaTherefore, everything that anyone says is technically quoting someone else. You can't avoid it. So why not quote people like RAW, if doing so is simply akin to learning to speak?

And a damn fine thought it is too. Of course, there is a difference between learning to speak and speaking (expressing what you want to say).

In much the same way there is a difference between learning to think and thinking. And that is IMO why people say you shouldn't quote - to them it smacks of not thinking for oneself (which is a bit of a theme in RAW's work). Of course, the flipside of that is that, "if I have seen farther than others, it was because I stood on the shoulders of giants".

chaosgraves:agentoferis

Quote from: Guido Finucci
Quote from: Medeo FaboverdaTherefore, everything that anyone says is technically quoting someone else. You can't avoid it. So why not quote people like RAW, if doing so is simply akin to learning to speak?

And a damn fine thought it is too. Of course, there is a difference between learning to speak and speaking (expressing what you want to say).

In much the same way there is a difference between learning to think and thinking. And that is IMO why people say you shouldn't quote - to them it smacks of not thinking for oneself (which is a bit of a theme in RAW's work). Of course, the flipside of that is that, "if I have seen farther than others, it was because I stood on the shoulders of giants".
They might be giants, they might be wood, they might be something made out of wood...boy
Constitution?!?!? Isn't that a D&D stat.

Sid Q

mmm,
yet to have your own ideas you must have a reference from where to stand upon..at the same time you are trying never to beleive what is written but you are still unconsciously storing information in your brain that you find inadequate..then remodeling it back and fooling yourself by beleiving that you are really objective and freethinking. It's a mindtrap loop that one has to control...
:shock:

chaosgraves:agentoferis

well, looks like someones been listening to their old Janet Jackson albums again.
Constitution?!?!? Isn't that a D&D stat.