News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

The economics of Botnets

Started by Triple Zero, July 23, 2009, 08:54:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Triple Zero

The Economics of Botnets

In the past ten years, botnets have evolved from small networks of a dozen PCs
controlled from a single C&C (command and control center) into sophisticated
distributed systems comprising millions of computers with decentralized control.
Why are these enormous zombie networks created? The answer can be given
in a single word: money.

Read the article: http://www.viruslist.com/analysis?pubid=204792068
                   
Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.

BabylonHoruv

heh, that article reads more as a "why aren't you running a bot net?" than it does as a call to combat them.
You're a special case, Babylon.  You are offensive even when you don't post.

Merely by being alive, you make everyone just a little more miserable

-Dok Howl

Captain Utopia

I don't think this problem will be solved until we start getting a bit more radical in our approaches to security.

E.g. An open source botnet running in VM that takes orders via encrypted channels and can be set to take orders from "friends" or "friends of friends" or specific agents, that maintains a distributed transactional system of currency linked to traded stock market commodity, such that an individual can "cash out" or "cash in" if they want to perform some action. Oh, and there's also another few hypervisor layers such that the botnet can update and repair itself and attack other botnets which would seek to compromise it.

So basically, I could choose to earn some credit by supporting an attack against GoDaddy, and there's nothing anyone could do about it because the system would always be in a state of flux, and it'd be impossible to tell if I did it out of self-interest or if my machine was just compromised at that moment. However, GoDaddy might offer free hosting to anyone who commits to an hour of CPU time, rDDoS'ing the IP addresses which are currently flooding it - they just sign the offer themselves and put it out on the market.

Whether it could be made to work, and whether it could be successfully argued for are two separate questions.

The only thing which doesn't seem to be in question is that the current security models are hopelessly broken.