The concluding "creative destruction" seems lamentably similar to Nietzche's "eternal repetition of the same". The very concept inherently contradicts itself given how there cannot be a multiplicity of the numerically identical; like any nihilistic argument this can either temper or level thinking. For me, a light scan was enough to WARRENT deep reading in the morning. (already I can't get this device to do away with that uppercase word, please forgive my seeming curt)