News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

Discuss libertarianism for the Nth time

Started by Shibboleet The Annihilator, February 23, 2010, 05:28:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Doktor Howl

Quote from: LMNO on February 24, 2010, 03:40:55 PM
One of the issues here appears to be whether the corrections should be pre- or post- regulated.

It only makes sense that the "Free Market" approach is Reactive: That is, when a company does something bad, and people find out about it, they make choices.  The company then adapts, or fails.  Bad behavior is eventually punished.

A "Regulation" approach is Proactive: That is, the gvt looks at the potential for bad behavior, and prohibits it.  The company adapts, or is penalized.  A certain kind of bad behavior is restricted.

The pitfalls of both approaches are many, especially when you take into account the flawed philosophies of captitalism, economics, and politics. 

The free market only works if people are able to make informed decisions.

Molon Lube

LMNO

Quote from: Doktor Howl on February 24, 2010, 04:13:32 PM
Quote from: LMNO on February 24, 2010, 03:40:55 PM
One of the issues here appears to be whether the corrections should be pre- or post- regulated.

It only makes sense that the "Free Market" approach is Reactive: That is, when a company does something bad, and people find out about it, they make choices.  The company then adapts, or fails.  Bad behavior is eventually punished.

A "Regulation" approach is Proactive: That is, the gvt looks at the potential for bad behavior, and prohibits it.  The company adapts, or is penalized.  A certain kind of bad behavior is restricted.

The pitfalls of both approaches are many, especially when you take into account the flawed philosophies of captitalism, economics, and politics. 

The free market only works if people are willing to make informed decisions.

Amended.

Elder Iptuous

What Requia said....
The free market is serving the public interest as far as production and efficiency goes.
What is not serving the public interest is the govt.  Merck conducted criminal behavior, and the govt. should have penalized them proportional to the crime, but they did not.  That is not a failure on the part of the market, which is not intended to swoop in with justice.  justice is not a product of the market, because it requires a monopoly on force and should be accountable to the public at large.
When corporations are able to manipulate the govt. to avoid penalties for criminal action, that is not the free market at work.


Doktor Howl

Quote from: Iptuous on February 24, 2010, 04:27:49 PM
What Requia said....
The free market is serving the public interest as far as production and efficiency goes.
What is not serving the public interest is the govt.  Merck conducted criminal behavior, and the govt. should have penalized them proportional to the crime, but they did not.  That is not a failure on the part of the market, which is not intended to swoop in with justice.  justice is not a product of the market, because it requires a monopoly on force and should be accountable to the public at large.
When corporations are able to manipulate the govt. to avoid penalties for criminal action, that is not the free market at work.


There has never been a free market, Iptuous.  It's a fantasy, like communism.
Molon Lube

Bebek Sincap Ratatosk

There are Free Markets... they're also known as Black Markets... outside of government control and influence. Free Markets gave us Bathtub Gin. Free Markets give us MDMA cut with strychnine. Free Markets give us Child Pornography.

Of course, those same Free Markets saved the collective asses of many poor Appalachians who turned to stills and stock cars for survival.

- I don't see race. I just see cars going around in a circle.

"Back in my day, crazy meant something. Now everyone is crazy" - Charlie Manson

Doktor Howl

Quote from: Ratatosk on February 24, 2010, 04:56:04 PM
There are Free Markets... they're also known as Black Markets...

Until someone murders you for your market share.  Or simply forces you to cough up a chunk of your profits.

Molon Lube

LMNO


Doktor Howl

Quote from: LMNO on February 24, 2010, 04:57:48 PM
Gimme yr sammich.

Yep.

Anarchy isn't freedom.

And anyone who thinks that the black market is a free market needs to google "John Torrio", and follow the links to the present day.
Molon Lube

Cramulus

iptuous, can you clarify for me---? It sounds like you're in favor of more gov't regulation and control of the free market. Which doesn't sound like something most libertarians would endorse, no?

Jenne


LMNO

Merging the two would be not only amusing, but useful.

Jenne

Same arguments from same interlocutors, I think. 

Cramulus

I apologize for enjoying what must be a boring discussion to some of you.

Doktor Howl

Quote from: Cramulus on February 24, 2010, 05:18:06 PM
I apologize for enjoying what must be a boring discussion to some of you.

I never get sick of this topic.  It flexes my rage gland.
Molon Lube