News:

For my part, I've replaced optimism and believing the best of people by default with a grin and the absolute 100% certainty that if they cannot find a pig to fuck, they will buy some bacon and play oinking noises on YouTube.

Main Menu

Mail bomb speculation thread

Started by ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞, October 25, 2018, 07:49:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞

#60
Quote from: Cain on October 27, 2018, 11:29:55 AM
Who wants to read the alleged bomber's twitter archive?  Of course you do

https://www.scribd.com/document/391692784/full-tweet-archive-of-the-MAGA-Bomber

That looks legit, but because I know I'll be asked—how do we know those are his accounts?
P E R   A S P E R A   A D   A S T R A

Cain

I'm not sure where the original information came from regarding his accounts, but that and another account have been named as his by several credible news sites.  That link itself came from Slate, if that helps.

rong

What's this I hear about unpostmarked stamps???
"a real smart feller, he felt smart"

Cain

Quote from: rong on October 27, 2018, 07:59:17 PM
What's this I hear about unpostmarked stamps???

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Mail-Bomb-Stamps-Cancelled-Explainer-498665661.html

QuoteFour separate officials briefed on, or involved with, the investigation have told NBC this week that some packages were not postmarked because the soft packaging could not go through the postal machines.

In fact, the U.S. Postal Service's own website says postmarks aren't required in all cases.

"Postmarks are not required for mailings bearing a permit, meter, or precanceled stamp for postage, nor to pieces with an indicia applied by various postage evidencing systems," the USPS says on this page.