News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

On Strong Inference,

Started by Kai, June 06, 2010, 12:46:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Brotep

Quote from: Kai on June 09, 2010, 04:33:07 PM
We can still find patterns in that though.

Certainly. I was pointing out that there is more than one universe to explore in such a case as music, while agreeing with you.


QuoteThink about instrument form, history of instrument design. We can track down the roots of different instruments and infer an instrument "phylogeny" based upon congruence of characters and historical information. We can, for example, track the modern acoustic guitar back to the torres classical and folk guitars of the 18th and 19th century, and further track those back to the vihuela. We can find a geneology of styles, "mutations" and novel creativity, etc.

Also, although music is abstract, there is a level of abstraction involved. We can, say, trace the idea of a melody, and how that broke down over time within North American music movements such as Jazz, where the level of abstraction from melody increased.

We can see these patterns, and we can ask these questions, regardless of the field. I think that's amazing, there really IS a unity of knowledge.
Yes. We're talking about coherent systems that follow rules and thus may be explored through inference.

Knowledge is dependent on inductive reasoning, on the ability to form associations--something even the simplest of biological neural networks is capable of to an extent.