RISUS! Please create a pention form.

[Doktor Howl]

http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?topic=26183.30

Several people in this thread posted one liners.  Myself included.  Get cracking.

[Chairman Risus]

Why can't you just argue rationally in the correct thread without attacking me personally?

[Doktor Howl]

Why can't you just argue rationally in the correct thread without attacking me personally?

It is my sad addiction to one-liners, and my lack of appreciation for Peleus' genius.

I blame the drugs.   

[Chairman Risus]

Stop creating extra threads and twisting everyone's words around.

[Doktor Howl]

Stop creating extra threads and twisting everyone's words around.

Oh, but it's okay when Peleus creates threads to disagree with someone's posting style?

What remarkably limber standards you have!

[Chairman Risus]

Can you merge the threads so we can disagree in just one place?

[LMNO]

Why can't you just argue rationally in the correct thread without attacking me personally?

I'm pretty sure the entire matter at hand is inherently and entirely irrational.  

[Doktor Howl]

Can you merge the threads so we can disagree in just one place?

Wait.

So Peleus can start a new thread making fun of Charley for no real reason, but nobody else can?

ARE YOU IN HIS PAY, RISUS?  ARE YOU A CHEAP GUN FOR HIRE?

[Doktor Howl]

You misspelled petition.

No, I didn't.

[Thurnez Isa]

Can you merge the threads so we can disagree in just one place?

Wait.

So Peleus can start a new thread making fun of Charley for no real reason, but nobody else can?

ARE YOU IN HIS PAY, RISUS?  ARE YOU A CHEAP GUN FOR HIRE?

To be fair he created one thread.
I will admit I don't understand the thread, but it's one

[Chairman Risus]

Why can't you just argue rationally in the correct thread without attacking me personally?

I'm pretty sure the entire matter at hand is inherently and entirely irrational.  

How?

Can you merge the threads so we can disagree in just one place?

Wait.

So Peleus can start a new thread making fun of Charley for no real reason, but nobody else can?

ARE YOU IN HIS PAY, RISUS?  ARE YOU A CHEAP GUN FOR HIRE?

1.There was a reason. 000 spelled it out for those who did not get it at first.
2. I was just hoping that I would not have to try to argue over the same thing in several different threads.

[Doktor Howl]

Can you merge the threads so we can disagree in just one place?

Wait.

So Peleus can start a new thread making fun of Charley for no real reason, but nobody else can?

ARE YOU IN HIS PAY, RISUS?  ARE YOU A CHEAP GUN FOR HIRE?

To be fair he created one thread.
I will admit I don't understand the thread, but it's one

In keeping with my beliefs on carrying everything entirely too far, I have no problem creating a pile of threads illustrating the basic disconnect in Risus' thinking, since he is either not getting it, or being a total fucking hypocrite.

I'm not MAD at him or Trip, I'm just a little shocked, frankly, at what I perceive to be a lapse in fair-mindedness out of both of them.

Also, Peleus is a piece of shit, and dogging on him improves my mood.

[Doktor Howl]

1.There was a reason. 000 spelled it out for those who did not get it at first.
2. I was just hoping that I would not have to try to argue over the same thing in several different threads.

1.  Yes.  And that reason seems to be "Charley is perceived by a shitstain named Peleus to be an easy target, and for some reason a couple of people I respect thought it was a good idea to jump on the pile".

2.  Why?  Peleus started a new thread to continue drama from two other threads.  Why is it different when I do it?

[LMNO]

Why can't you just argue rationally in the correct thread without attacking me personally?

I'm pretty sure the entire matter at hand is inherently and entirely irrational.  

How?

It revolves around the subjective emotional responses regarding one-liner dismissals, the implied emotions of those one-liners, and the reactions to those emotional responses.  And considering the only "rational" behavior was for Peleus and others to just ignore them rather than create a passive-aggressive swipe thread, this entire flare up was guaranteed the moment Peleus clicked the "create new thread" button.

[Doktor Howl]

Why can't you just argue rationally in the correct thread without attacking me personally?

I'm pretty sure the entire matter at hand is inherently and entirely irrational.  

How?

It revolves around the subjective emotional responses regarding one-liner dismissals, the implied emotions of those one-liners, and the reactions to those emotional responses.  And considering the only "rational" behavior was for Peleus and others to just ignore them rather than create a passive-aggressive swipe thread, this entire flare up was guaranteed the moment Peleus clicked the "create new thread" button.

No, it's totally different when Peleus does it.  Or so I am told.