MATLAB ? 2010 ? 2011 ?

[hirley0]

26purple0
20110718 2:22
7/19 it does appear that the foLLowing is where i'z going M_Lab.Ly
7/20 WiFi down McLiB: 9:45b
7/22 out of Min

http://www.bautforum.com/group.php?groupid=5

291102723 i did manage to graph an approach to an approximation of the above /\
0 t0 180Ma the Velocity of continental spread has slowed since 64Ma (K/T)
PRIOR to the (K/T) the rate of spread had been increasing !! but not Linearly

[hirley0]

8/2 top down v




8/5 10:40pdT 2nd reboot searching 4 disruptions
8/9 MARKET? SIEX move -./

[hirley0]

FIVE 9/1 #5 9/1 4am, 2 5.5
FOUR should be enough for my Mth LeveL see U at 16th
#4 {deleted 9/1 20110813 2
#3 8/13 6:52 20110813 1
post2 20110420 April & index
post1 10/10/10 Starting points for R? P/P8

Rin_13161701 Photos

IT DOES NOW (11-12AM pdT) ThaT for now at least R '$ is Inop
thus the Salmon St bench {shadey side of street) at 16th wiLL be Space/Place
a mail box will be ATTached behind the Bench for R messAGEas /-/U? 10:36B
20111001 UNable to log in PW REQUEST:
20110815 IT LOOKS TO ME AS THOUGH IV FOUND A SITE TO DO MAth Maybe /-/

[hirley0]

ay at 08:10:05 AM
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/bios/cottam/cottam_image.html (Origional)


The connection has timed out ? ay at 07:15:40 AM
PRoblem with R thUS moving along to 20110817 8:11:11.111 pd T
BOTTOM UP ^

[hirley0]

OK: what is it?
Listen WHAT i'LL try to find is the Variable
the change in the intensity (OR position) of the 2? (Comprenda'?

[Faust]

The connection has timed out ? ay at 07:15:40 AM
PRoblem with R thUS moving along to 20110817 8:11:11.111 pd T
BOTTOM UP ^

Is that a transit diagram of intensity?

[hirley0]

My sinceer Opollogy for being Miss Leading see bottom LiNE

The connection has timed out ? ay at 07:15:40 AM
PRoblem with R thUS moving along to 20110817 8:11:11.111 pd T
BOTTOM UP ^

Is that a transit diagram of intensity?

No? this is a (Click_X) StiLL as far as I know (1T)

[hirley0]

9:39 B ?
the problem being
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/bios/cottam/cottam_image.html
-
if i were to Write Dr.
and ask about the ORange lines
SHE {without doubt) would contact athorities {{ etc etc ))
thus: for me to get from NasTa {{{ for eXample }}} the Time sequence
= ==
10:24 of Lunar distance? (Comprenda'? :// Click X 4 LiNk2
:: :
1 find SolorChronology { like dendrachronology {{ only from Solar Spectral Lines
2 find out if SC exists in solar light reflected from the moon { OR if its Lost
3 compute the difference in time direct Sun to Earth & Sun - Moon - Earth =
? ? ? ?
My guess is that (SC) eXists, probably not in the visual spectrum
it wiLL probably have To wait for the radio Ometers to tune in the Solar Spectrum
and then find the Variable to be USed ? an obsorbtion in the nano meter part ?
TBC? 11:11amB current guess  = SC location @ `sORbtion at 2.4gHz, 41-44 nm

[hirley0]

ABOVE R My attempts to fathom the $cale / i do not think it
LiNEar however mY 1st approach WAS: sorry to be Miss Leading
again any help UNderstanding ANY of this taiL appriciate GrEAT.Ly

[Rumckle]

I'd say your right, they appear to be the Na lines. Perhaps it may be also useful to examine other lines to get a sense of what the scale is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fraunhofer_lines.svg

Looking down in the aqua region it easy to spot the E line and the b lines. Also, I think you're also right about it not being linear

[Rumckle]

Actually, after a quick analysis using those sodium lines and the E line (not much data I know, but I just wanted a quick check), leads me to believe that it may be linear.

[hirley0]

20110820 PM May as weLL troLL on about
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/bios/cottam/cottam_image.html
My guess is that sCALE ?"COMPRESSION"? eXists 1(RED) nm not = 1(blue)
red being more tightly packed BLUE end spread  (some form of Log}?
-
Further my guess is the cottam_image was obtained using ?"PRism"?
Further that Prism & defraction do NOT calibrate to the same LOG
= =
thUS the Question arises do glass & Quartz use the same LOG scale ?plastic
: : :
OK never mind its AAstronomy (RIGHT}?  andI for one doubT aLL of it,
beginning with THE HubbLe (1 l}? 4me there is no reason to 'poise
Big is getting Bigger & not to Theroize SmaLL is geting Smaller
? ? ? ?
My guess about RED SHIFT {if eXists) as atom shrinks (over Time}
that as time passes the emission lines change too.-. So U C ive
my way of looking at it. It is deffinatly NOT their way. OK? what
was the point anyway. 4me it makes no sence whatsoever that .-T.
/TilT\
galaxies biLLions of years ago Look exactly the same as the ones
seen today. are asTronomers simply looking at a house of mirrows
a calidoscope of the same object being reflected over multipuLL
pathways. talk abouT aTmospheric alterations How about Big 1'$
~bt~
aLLright: I'Z attempting to find something i call "SC"
Solor Chronology ( a time variable ?absorbtion? Line ) to use
as a clock. such that it (SC) could be used to measure distance
(light distance) to the Moon Venus Mars Jupiter etc etc
.BB.
of couse i do not know if SC can be found (my guess is yes it can
{and easiLy once some one tries to find 'Er | the Big gimmy is
would SC be retained in the reflected light from Venus? etc
Venus seams to be the most likeLy object for wE beginners of This?

`

Actually, after a quick analysis using those sodium lines and the E line (not much data I know, but I just wanted a quick check), leads me to believe that it may be linear.

[rong]

you're trying to compare the spectrum of light that has been reflected, and therefore has travelled farther and is therefore older to light directly from the source to see if it has changed?

how can you be certain the change spectrum is due to change in the source and not due to the nature of the "mirror?"

might be better to put 2 collectors roughly in line at different distances from the source.

[hirley0]

you're trying to compare the spectrum of light that has been reflected, and therefore has travelled farther and is therefore older to light directly from the source to see if it has changed?

how can you be certain the change spectrum is due to change in the source and not due to the nature of the "mirror?"

might be better to put 2 collectors roughly in line at different distances from the source.

http://www.bautforum.com/showthread.php/102715-Lunar-Distance?p=1912527#post1912527
HYPERLINKED version of the above line
9:20B? 8/21 BROWN actually i AM not sure exactly what i AM
TRYING TO DO?  yes measure direct vs reflected! however 1st the SC must
be discovered? it seams reasonable to me that one or more may in fact
exist. its just a matter of fine tuning over a long time frame to calibrate out
the parameters involved in such an  approach to the questions. WHO wiLL it
be? NasTa? i rather doubt this aLso. Most likely some AMature wiLL find 1.

[rong]

If time were to stop, how long would it stop for?