News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

Facial Recognition Study?

Started by hooplala, February 08, 2011, 04:04:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

hooplala

I am looking for some help here, and I'm not totally sure how to go about it... I am hoping someone here will know what I am talking about and can point me in the right direction.


I believe there was a study done sometime in the last ten years (may have been longer) where it was determined that humans respond positively toward things which have indications of a human face, things as basic as "smiley faces" or coloured lights forming smiles, etc.  However, the flip side of this study was that there was a line... crossing this line and making things look "too human" tended to creep people out.  Think marionettes, robotic presidents at Disney World, etc...

Here's the thing, I was positive that I had read about this study in a column by Roger Ebert of all people, I could have sworn he sited this study in his review for the Wayan's Brothers movie 'White Chicks', but having just re-read that review I can find absolutely no reference to it, as if I dreamed it.  I really hope this is not the case. 

Does this study sound familiar to anyone here?
"Soon all of us will have special names" — Professor Brian O'Blivion

"Now's not the time to get silly, so wear your big boots and jump on the garbage clowns." — Bob Dylan?

"Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.)"
— Walt Whitman

Elder Iptuous


hooplala

"Soon all of us will have special names" — Professor Brian O'Blivion

"Now's not the time to get silly, so wear your big boots and jump on the garbage clowns." — Bob Dylan?

"Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.)"
— Walt Whitman


Elder Iptuous

two percent have prosopagnosia?!
that would imply that you see one of these people every time you are in a crowd...
my dubiosity is engorged.

also. i read it as proSPAGnosia.  which i would assume means the innability to recognize half the spags on the board because they change their goddamn name and avatar every gundamned week....
i suffer that.

Jasper

:lulz: @ Iptuous

Yeah, uncanny valley.  Big problem for video games.


Dean

Apparently Oliver Sacks, who write books on his more interesting clinical psychology cases, has prosopagnosia.