Unlimited "you don't actually own your iPhone" thread

Started by Cain, June 22, 2011, 01:22:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Cramulus on June 22, 2011, 06:18:36 PM
I posted this on FB and an iphone fanboy said

QuoteThat's the most misleading news item ever. They filed a patent for a system that can use IR lights to activate phone features. Someone speculated that it could be used to disable cameras at concerts and everyone ran with it without checking the facts.


I kind of feel like citation needed. For everything. Because the Daily Mail is not a credible source of information, and neither is an apple fanboy.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Igor

So here's the patent:
http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220110128384%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20110128384&RS=DN/20110128384

And here's the relevant bit of it:
Quote[0048] In some embodiments, infrared data can be received and an electronic device can modify a device operation based on the infrared data. For example, an electronic device can disable a function of the device based on received infrared data. In some embodiments, a transmitter can be located in areas where capturing pictures and videos is prohibited (e.g., a concert or a classified facility) and the transmitters can generate infrared signals with encoded data that includes commands temporarily disabling recording functions.
Be what you would seem to be - or, if you'd like it put more simply - never imagine yourself not to be otherwise than what it might appear to others that what you were or might have been was not otherwise than what you had been would have appeared to them to be otherwise.

Cramulus


Igor

Oh, and this pic might or might not be in the image gallery associated with the patent:



Ironically, I can't see the image gallery directly because I don't have Apple Quicktime. :lulz:
Be what you would seem to be - or, if you'd like it put more simply - never imagine yourself not to be otherwise than what it might appear to others that what you were or might have been was not otherwise than what you had been would have appeared to them to be otherwise.

LMNO

So, the FB iPhone fanboy claimed you didn't check the facts, didn't actually check the facts?


I love the interbutts.

AnnaMaeBollocks

 :lol:

People will just use another phone anyway, or an actual camera. And as mentioned, bands generally don't mind people making videos or taping at shows, some of them look at it like free PR. They'd probably rather have a laz0r for the radio people who leak albums to those free download sites pre-release.  :evil:

Apple FAIL.

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Igor on June 22, 2011, 06:47:40 PM
So here's the patent:
http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220110128384%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20110128384&RS=DN/20110128384

And here's the relevant bit of it:
Quote[0048] In some embodiments, infrared data can be received and an electronic device can modify a device operation based on the infrared data. For example, an electronic device can disable a function of the device based on received infrared data. In some embodiments, a transmitter can be located in areas where capturing pictures and videos is prohibited (e.g., a concert or a classified facility) and the transmitters can generate infrared signals with encoded data that includes commands temporarily disabling recording functions.


Awesome, thanks!
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: AnnaMaeBollocks on June 22, 2011, 07:16:39 PM
:lol:

People will just use another phone anyway, or an actual camera. And as mentioned, bands generally don't mind people making videos or taping at shows, some of them look at it like free PR. They'd probably rather have a laz0r for the radio people who leak albums to those free download sites pre-release.  :evil:

Apple FAIL.

One thing to keep in mind about filing patents is that they are often filed just to lock them down. Whether Apple actually develops anything that turns off certain features is another matter.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Jasper

Wouldn't it be simpler to just confiscate people's recording devices?

:?

LMNO

As soon as you work security for a major musical event, you can answer that question all on your own.

Jasper

*thinks a sec*

Yeah.  Ok.


It would be simpler (and more profitable for the artists) to just have professional recordings of the concert be made, and sell it on the web.

Cramulus


Precious Moments Zalgo

Quote from: AnnaMaeBollocks on June 22, 2011, 07:16:39 PMPeople will just use another phone anyway, or an actual camera.
I anticipate lobbying to require this feature on all smartphones and video cameras.
I will answer ANY prayer for $39.95.*

*Unfortunately, I cannot give refunds in the event that the answer is no.

LMNO

Quote from: Jasper on June 22, 2011, 09:09:26 PM
*thinks a sec*

Yeah.  Ok.


It would be simpler (and more profitable for the artists) to just have professional recordings of the concert be made, and sell it on the web.
Quote from: Cramulus on June 22, 2011, 09:21:19 PM
screw that!


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_Jam_Official_Bootlegs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychic_TV#Psychic_TV_live

As a business model, it's feasible.  I'd pay money for a decent recording over a shoddy cellphone one.

Doktor Howl

Quote from: Cramulus on June 22, 2011, 09:21:19 PM
screw that!


I'd pay a couple of bucks for a recording, rather than spend the entire concert holding one arm up in the air.
Molon Lube