News:

Testimonial - Well it seems that most of you "discordians" are little more than dupes of the Cathedral/NWO memetic apparatus after all -- "freethinkers" in the sense that you are willing to think slightly outside the designated boxes of correct thought, but not free in the sense that you reject the existence of the boxes and seek their destruction.

Main Menu

UNLIMITED Wizard Joseph Garbage Collection Thread.

Started by The Wizard Joseph, June 29, 2011, 11:21:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9
User actions

Don Coyote

#105
September 25, 2015, 08:31:05 PM
Quote from: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on September 25, 2015, 08:29:50 PM
Quote from: The Wizard Joseph on September 24, 2015, 10:11:38 PM
Quote from: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on September 24, 2015, 06:09:09 PM
Quote from: LMNO on September 24, 2015, 06:04:35 PM
To be honest, I'd be more interested in seeing what our collective EQ is.

Probably higher than you would expect.

Very interested in seeing where PD lies on the autism spectrum.

On the inverse from the EQ scores.

I took an online EQ test the other day. I got a 41  :|

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

#106
September 25, 2015, 08:37:31 PM
Quote from: Don Coyote on September 25, 2015, 08:31:05 PM
Quote from: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on September 25, 2015, 08:29:50 PM
Quote from: The Wizard Joseph on September 24, 2015, 10:11:38 PM
Quote from: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on September 24, 2015, 06:09:09 PM
Quote from: LMNO on September 24, 2015, 06:04:35 PM
To be honest, I'd be more interested in seeing what our collective EQ is.

Probably higher than you would expect.

Very interested in seeing where PD lies on the autism spectrum.

On the inverse from the EQ scores.

I took an online EQ test the other day. I got a 41  :|

Is it scored the way an IQ test is scored?
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

#107
September 25, 2015, 08:42:50 PM
Which one did you take? Berkeley has one that's based on recognizing facial emotions, which I think is not bad but some people have limitations in their facial recognition processing that makes it a bit biased in that arena, since body language is also a very valid way of picking up emotional cues.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."

Don Coyote

#108
September 25, 2015, 08:57:08 PM
Quote from: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on September 25, 2015, 08:37:31 PM
Quote from: Don Coyote on September 25, 2015, 08:31:05 PM
Quote from: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on September 25, 2015, 08:29:50 PM
Quote from: The Wizard Joseph on September 24, 2015, 10:11:38 PM
Quote from: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on September 24, 2015, 06:09:09 PM
Quote from: LMNO on September 24, 2015, 06:04:35 PM
To be honest, I'd be more interested in seeing what our collective EQ is.

Probably higher than you would expect.

Very interested in seeing where PD lies on the autism spectrum.

On the inverse from the EQ scores.

I took an online EQ test the other day. I got a 41  :|

Is it scored the way an IQ test is scored?

It's out of 80, with 30 being "may be autistic." I took this one http://psychology-tools.com/empathy-quotient/. It's wholly text based, and I suspect it may be flawed as I know I am a generally empathic person, in person.

LMNO

#109
September 25, 2015, 09:15:43 PM
Odd. I got a 32.



Then again, I tend to avoid the far left and right answers on those kinds of tests, just because, you know, ambiguity.

Maybe it just shows I'm bad at tests.

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

#110
September 25, 2015, 09:17:07 PM
Quote from: Don Coyote on September 25, 2015, 08:57:08 PM
Quote from: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on September 25, 2015, 08:37:31 PM
Quote from: Don Coyote on September 25, 2015, 08:31:05 PM
Quote from: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on September 25, 2015, 08:29:50 PM
Quote from: The Wizard Joseph on September 24, 2015, 10:11:38 PM
Quote from: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on September 24, 2015, 06:09:09 PM
Quote from: LMNO on September 24, 2015, 06:04:35 PM
To be honest, I'd be more interested in seeing what our collective EQ is.

Probably higher than you would expect.

Very interested in seeing where PD lies on the autism spectrum.

On the inverse from the EQ scores.

I took an online EQ test the other day. I got a 41  :|

Is it scored the way an IQ test is scored?

It's out of 80, with 30 being "may be autistic." I took this one http://psychology-tools.com/empathy-quotient/. It's wholly text based, and I suspect it may be flawed as I know I am a generally empathic person, in person.

I just now scored 58 on that test, so I wouldn't worry about 41. I normally score very high on EQ evaluations.

"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."

EK WAFFLR

#111
September 26, 2015, 06:20:38 PM
I got a 39, which is low for me on these kinds of tests.
"At first I lifted weights.  But then I asked myself, 'why not people?'  Now everyone runs for the fjord when they see me."


Horribly Oscillating Assbasket of Deliciousness
[/b]

trippinprincezz13

#112
September 28, 2015, 04:58:09 PM
Yea, 44 here. And while not trying to sound like Most Empathetic Guy in the Room, that does seem pretty off for me.
There's no sun shine coming through her ass, if you are sure of your penis.

Paranoia is a disease unto itself, and may I add, the person standing next to you, may not be who they appear to be, so take precaution.

If there is no order in your sexual life it may be difficult to stay with a whole skin.

Trivial

#113
September 29, 2015, 04:43:53 AM
Quote from: The All-Seeing Waffle on September 26, 2015, 06:20:38 PM
I got a 39, which is low for me on these kinds of tests.

Ditto.



Sexy Octopus of the Next Noosphere Horde

There are more nipples in the world than people.

Cain

#114
September 29, 2015, 04:53:46 AM
I'm apparently on the autistic spectrum  :lol:

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

#115
September 29, 2015, 03:11:27 PM
I suspect this test is rather heavily weighted. Autism for everyone!
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."

Freeky

#116
September 29, 2015, 09:02:59 PM
Hey, don't go hating on those internet diagnosed autistic people.  They just don't know how to relate to people, this test says so!

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

#117
September 30, 2015, 11:31:48 PM
Quote from: Choppas an' Sluggas on September 29, 2015, 09:02:59 PM
Hey, don't go hating on those internet diagnosed autistic people.  They just don't know how to relate to people, this test says so!

:horrormirth:
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."

The Good Reverend Roger

#118
September 30, 2015, 11:39:46 PM
I scored FUCK YOU, SHUT UP.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

#119
September 30, 2015, 11:50:13 PM
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."

Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9
User actions