News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

Well, there's one race that may be happening I actually care about.

Started by LMNO, September 07, 2011, 08:01:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cramulus

I was just comparing the two, I didn't mean to imply that you guys love scott brown

East Coast Hustle

Good, because that shiftless sonofabitch didn't even buy me dinner the last time we hooked up.
Rabid Colostomy Hole Jammer of the Coming Apocalypse™

The Devil is in the details; God is in the nuance.


Some yahoo yelled at me, saying 'GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH', and I thought, "I'm feeling generous today.  Why not BOTH?"

LMNO

This amuses me.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/08/slavery-is-freedom-and-all-that/

QuoteNo line of attack is too bizarre, too much in contradiction both with the facts and with everything else the right says, to be out of bounds.

And so I'm not as surprised as Greg Sargent seems to be that Karl Rove's latest line of attack against Elizabeth Warren is that she's too close to Wall Street. Hey, she oversaw the use of TARP funds!

Greg takes this as a sign that Democrats are winning the argument, and it is. But they also have to win the election. And this wouldn't be the first time that nonsensical arguments that rely on voter ignorance about who stands for what have worked.