News:

All you can say in this site's defence is that it, rather than reality, occupies the warped minds of some of the planet's most twisted people; gods know what they would get up to if it wasn't here.  In these arguably insane times, any lessening or attenuation of madness is maybe something to be thankful for.

Main Menu

17, the "most random" number.

Started by Telarus, June 27, 2012, 08:02:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Anna Mae Bollocks

It says on page 12 of this that when told to pick a random number between 10-100 with different even digits, people will almost always pick 68.
http://www.oocities.org/tennislasalle/blaine.pdf
Scantily-Clad Inspector of Gigantic and Unnecessary Cashews, Texas Division

E.O.T.

Quote from: TEXAS FAIRIES FOR ALL YOU SPAGS on June 28, 2012, 06:28:57 PM
It says on page 12 of this that when told to pick a random number between 10-100 with different even digits, people will almost always pick 68.
http://www.oocities.org/tennislasalle/blaine.pdf

PERHAPS

          it's a sublime mental step away from 69?
"a good fight justifies any cause"

Anna Mae Bollocks

The conventional wisdom surrounding 68 is "you eat me and I'll owe ya one".
Heard it in a bar so it must be true.  :lol:
Scantily-Clad Inspector of Gigantic and Unnecessary Cashews, Texas Division

E.O.T.

Quote from: TEXAS FAIRIES FOR ALL YOU SPAGS on June 28, 2012, 06:38:52 PM
The conventional wisdom surrounding 68 is "you eat me and I'll owe ya one".
Heard it in a bar so it must be true.  :lol:

HA HA

          what does one get for a 17?
"a good fight justifies any cause"

LMNO

It gets you arrested for statuatory rape.

Triple Zero

BTW a little while back I came across a new explanation for the Law of Fives. It's tangentially related to pattern recognition like our usual interpretation, but a different approach on the fundamental mathematical side:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_Law_of_Small_Numbers

It also doesn't lend itself as easily to philosophical insights. At least, none that I've been able to discover so far.
Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.

LMNO

That's also covered in the book I'm (still) reading, "Thinking Fast and Slow".  I have to go to a meeting, but while there may not be philisophical implications, there are certainly pragmatic ones.