Sermon # Whatever: I fucking hate you. Die.

[Sir Bearington]

If "God" could be proven to exist, he would instantly once again not exist because all faith which makes him up of what he is would dissipate into fact.

Essentially killing "God"

You are assuming he eats faith.  He doesn't.  He eats souls.

The afterlife must therefore be a excuse to stuff gods face full of delicious tasty souls.

Does that make mankind "God's" cattle then? 

[The Good Reverend Roger]

If "God" could be proven to exist, he would instantly once again not exist because all faith which makes him up of what he is would dissipate into fact.

Essentially killing "God"

You are assuming he eats faith.  He doesn't.  He eats souls.

The afterlife must therefore be a excuse to stuff gods face full of delicious tasty souls.

Does that make mankind "God's" cattle then? 

Yeah, but he can only eat people that believe in him.

The funniest part of THAT is that the joke is on the atheists.

[LMNO]

Unless you adhere to the theory of the "Malevolent Diety".  God exists, and he's an asshole who fucks with humanity on a daily basis.

I've been saying that for decades.

You're my main citation for this cosmology, you know.

If "God" could be proven to exist, he would instantly once again not exist because all faith which makes him up of what he is would dissipate into fact.

Essentially killing "God"

Douglas Adams did that riff with more panache.

[Sir Bearington]

If "God" could be proven to exist, he would instantly once again not exist because all faith which makes him up of what he is would dissipate into fact.

Essentially killing "God"

You are assuming he eats faith.  He doesn't.  He eats souls.

The afterlife must therefore be a excuse to stuff gods face full of delicious tasty souls.

Does that make mankind "God's" cattle then? 

Yeah, but he can only eat people that believe in him.

The funniest part of THAT is that the joke is on the atheists.

Atheists must once they die assume the form of "God's" equivelent of butterfingers.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

If "God" could be proven to exist, he would instantly once again not exist because all faith which makes him up of what he is would dissipate into fact.

Essentially killing "God"

You are assuming he eats faith.  He doesn't.  He eats souls.

The afterlife must therefore be a excuse to stuff gods face full of delicious tasty souls.

Does that make mankind "God's" cattle then? 

Yeah, but he can only eat people that believe in him.

The funniest part of THAT is that the joke is on the atheists.

Atheists must once they die assume the form of "God's" equivelent of butterfingers.

No.  No God gets to eat them.

So they become this pathetic ghost that shuffles to the office and back, every day.  Forever.

[wlfjstr]

I'm sorry, did I tell you how to be a discordian?  I thought that I gave my perspective on the issues you brought out in your original post.  I'm fine with you believing what you want, like I could stop you if I wanted.

I did not mean to imply that you were on drugs, it was a metaphor.  I'm so very, very sorry that it offended you.  But offending you appears to be very easy.

I'm probably done for today.  I'll be back, at some point.  I likely won't go through all of your invective to respond to every attack you've come up with (you are prolific).

I will reply when I feel I might be able to add something.

[Sir Bearington]

If "God" could be proven to exist, he would instantly once again not exist because all faith which makes him up of what he is would dissipate into fact.

Essentially killing "God"

You are assuming he eats faith.  He doesn't.  He eats souls.

The afterlife must therefore be a excuse to stuff gods face full of delicious tasty souls.

Does that make mankind "God's" cattle then? 

Yeah, but he can only eat people that believe in him.

The funniest part of THAT is that the joke is on the atheists.

Atheists must once they die assume the form of "God's" equivelent of butterfingers.

No.  No God gets to eat them.

So they become this pathetic ghost that shuffles to the office and back, every day.  Forever.

Your logic is flawed since he can only eat people who believe in him but athiests dont but still get eaten.

What gives?

[The Good Reverend Roger]

I did not mean to imply that you were on drugs, it was a metaphor.  I'm so very, very sorry that it offended you.  But offending you appears to be very easy.

No, you specifically said that I must be on acid, probably the brown acid.

And even if it was a metaphor, you were directly implying that because you disagree with my opinion, I must be impaired in some manner.  Deny that, and I'll call you a fucking liar.

And as far as being offended goes, I am showing you a great deal more respect than you showed me.

So don't fucking wimp out on me now, boy.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

If "God" could be proven to exist, he would instantly once again not exist because all faith which makes him up of what he is would dissipate into fact.

Essentially killing "God"

You are assuming he eats faith.  He doesn't.  He eats souls.

The afterlife must therefore be a excuse to stuff gods face full of delicious tasty souls.

Does that make mankind "God's" cattle then? 

Yeah, but he can only eat people that believe in him.

The funniest part of THAT is that the joke is on the atheists.

Atheists must once they die assume the form of "God's" equivelent of butterfingers.

No.  No God gets to eat them.

So they become this pathetic ghost that shuffles to the office and back, every day.  Forever.

Your logic is flawed since he can only eat people who believe in him but athiests dont but still get eaten.

What gives?

Where did I say Atheists get eaten?

Dumbass.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

I'm probably done for today.  I'll be back, at some point.  I likely won't go through all of your invective to respond to every attack you've come up with (you are prolific).

That's okay.  I'll pick up the slack for you when you return.

[Sir Bearington]

If "God" could be proven to exist, he would instantly once again not exist because all faith which makes him up of what he is would dissipate into fact.

Essentially killing "God"

You are assuming he eats faith.  He doesn't.  He eats souls.

The afterlife must therefore be a excuse to stuff gods face full of delicious tasty souls.

Does that make mankind "God's" cattle then? 

Yeah, but he can only eat people that believe in him.

The funniest part of THAT is that the joke is on the atheists.

Atheists must once they die assume the form of "God's" equivelent of butterfingers.

No.  No God gets to eat them.

So they become this pathetic ghost that shuffles to the office and back, every day.  Forever.

Here dumbass.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

If "God" could be proven to exist, he would instantly once again not exist because all faith which makes him up of what he is would dissipate into fact.

Essentially killing "God"

You are assuming he eats faith.  He doesn't.  He eats souls.

The afterlife must therefore be a excuse to stuff gods face full of delicious tasty souls.

Does that make mankind "God's" cattle then? 

Yeah, but he can only eat people that believe in him.

The funniest part of THAT is that the joke is on the atheists.

Atheists must once they die assume the form of "God's" equivelent of butterfingers.

No.  No God gets to eat them.

So they become this pathetic ghost that shuffles to the office and back, every day.  Forever.

Here dumbass.

"NO GOD GETS TO EAT THEM."

You're from Wales, right?

[Sir Bearington]

If "God" could be proven to exist, he would instantly once again not exist because all faith which makes him up of what he is would dissipate into fact.

Essentially killing "God"

You are assuming he eats faith.  He doesn't.  He eats souls.

The afterlife must therefore be a excuse to stuff gods face full of delicious tasty souls.

Does that make mankind "God's" cattle then? 

Yeah, but he can only eat people that believe in him.

The funniest part of THAT is that the joke is on the atheists.

Atheists must once they die assume the form of "God's" equivalent of butterfingers.

No.  No God gets to eat them.

So they become this pathetic ghost that shuffles to the office and back, every day.  Forever.

Here dumbass.

"NO GOD GETS TO EAT THEM."

You're from Wales, right?

England,

That is what you said as a response to my post about atheists

[The Good Reverend Roger]

If "God" could be proven to exist, he would instantly once again not exist because all faith which makes him up of what he is would dissipate into fact.

Essentially killing "God"

You are assuming he eats faith.  He doesn't.  He eats souls.

The afterlife must therefore be a excuse to stuff gods face full of delicious tasty souls.

Does that make mankind "God's" cattle then? 

Yeah, but he can only eat people that believe in him.

The funniest part of THAT is that the joke is on the atheists.

Atheists must once they die assume the form of "God's" equivalent of butterfingers.

No.  No God gets to eat them.

So they become this pathetic ghost that shuffles to the office and back, every day.  Forever.

Here dumbass.

"NO GOD GETS TO EAT THEM."

You're from Wales, right?

England,

That is what you said as a response to my post about atheists

Yes.

It's that comma issue you have, again.

I said:

No God gets to eat them.  (As in no God in any belief system gets to eat them.)

Not:

No, God gets to eat them.

And I maintain that you must be Welsh, on account of your inability to speak Englis...Or in fact anything more than grunts and whistles.

[EK WAFFLR]

Holy Mother of Goose.

Quark gluon plasma, much, trollbear?