News:

If you can't abuse it, it's not power.

Main Menu

Brit Spags! So Jim fixed it...

Started by Mangrove, October 23, 2012, 08:23:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cain

And while I'm here

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/26/world/europe/savile-inquiry-widens-to-others-at-bbc-reports-say.html?hp&_r=0

QuoteThe officer, Cmdr. Peter Spindler, described Mr. Savile, who died last October at 84, as "undoubtedly" one of the most prolific sex offenders in recent British history, during a 50-year career as a self-styled pied piper for the young, the sick and the lonely. Commander Spindler said that in preliminary telephone interviews with 130 of the potential victims, 114 of them had accused Mr. Savile of criminal behavior ranging from "inappropriate touching" to rape. Of the 300 complainants, he said, all but 2 have been female.

Commander Spindler said the "vast majority" of the accusations logged by the police were against Mr. Savile alone, with the remainder involving Mr. Savile and others or episodes in which the entertainer was not implicated. Although the commander specified that investigators had found no evidence of a "pedophile ring," as some published accounts in Britain have suggested, he said that a number of "living people" were under investigation.

And the 10 Downing Street pedophile ring suspect has been named

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/397824/20121024/tom-watson-child-sex-ring-sire-peter.htm

QuoteThe politician implicated in an alleged child sex ring at 10 Downing Street was Sir Peter Morrison, one of Margaret Thatcher's closest advisers, IBTimes UK can reveal.

Morrison was the mystery "senior aide" MP Tom Watson alluded to at Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs). Watson's allegation of a paedophile ring close to Downing Street stunned the House of Commons.

Morrison was a Conservative politician who acted as Thatcher's parliamentary private secretary while she was prime minister. He also masterminded her failed bid to hold on to the leadership in 1990.

Morrison left office in 1992 and died in 1995.

The sexual tastes of the prime minister's trusted adviser were an open secret in some quarters but were concealed by a police cover-up and threats of libel by Morrison himself, according to a former editor of the Sunday Mirror, Peter Connew.

Simon Heffer wrote in the Daily Telegraph in 2009: "At least one member of Mrs Thatcher's first cabinet was homosexual. Her last parliamentary private secretary, Sir Peter Morrison, was a constant trial to the whips, who were afraid that his late-night cruises around and skirmishes in Sussex Gardens would come to the attention of the press."

Yes, that is the same Morrison named above by Nick Davies.

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: Mangrove on October 26, 2012, 04:30:51 PM
Of course, you do realize that the Catholic Church blames institutionalized paedohpillia on the 'permissive 1960s'.

Well, it sure as fuck as nothing to do with THEIR policies, right?

And it's a good thing for them that there weren't loads of priests diddling kids in the 1950s or anything.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Mangrove

Quote from: Man Yellow on October 26, 2012, 04:40:59 PM
Quote from: Mangrove on October 26, 2012, 04:30:51 PM
Of course, you do realize that the Catholic Church blames institutionalized paedohpillia on the 'permissive 1960s'.

Well, it sure as fuck as nothing to do with THEIR policies, right?

And it's a good thing for them that there weren't loads of priests diddling kids in the 1950s or anything.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0rziDkWbpg   (watch at 30 seconds from tv show 'Father Ted')

Trying to find a link to the story that came out a few years ago when the Church did an investigation into abuse and returned with the verdict that it was 'the permissive 1960s' to blame.

ETA - Found it

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/19/us-catholic-church-sexual-abuse-report

What makes it so? Making it so is what makes it so.

tyrannosaurus vex

Apparently the Boy Scouts have a problem with this as well. If this shit keeps coming out, somebody's going to start saying the 1950s weren't all they were cracked up to be.
Evil and Unfeeling Arse-Flenser From The City of the Damned.

P3nT4gR4m

Quote from: Mangrove on October 26, 2012, 04:53:30 PM
Quote from: Man Yellow on October 26, 2012, 04:40:59 PM
Quote from: Mangrove on October 26, 2012, 04:30:51 PM
Of course, you do realize that the Catholic Church blames institutionalized paedohpillia on the 'permissive 1960s'.

Well, it sure as fuck as nothing to do with THEIR policies, right?

And it's a good thing for them that there weren't loads of priests diddling kids in the 1950s or anything.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0rziDkWbpg   (watch at 30 seconds from tv show 'Father Ted')


QuoteThis video contains content from Channel 4, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.

:eek:

Downloading the entire back catalogue on general principle...

I'm up to my arse in Brexit Numpties, but I want more.  Target-rich environments are the new sexy.
Not actually a meat product.
Ass-Kicking & Foot-Stomping Ancient Master of SHIT FUCK FUCK FUCK
Awful and Bent Behemothic Results of Last Night's Painful Squat.
High Altitude Haggis-Filled Sex Bucket From Beyond Time and Space.
Internet Monkey Person of Filthy and Immoral Pygmy-Porn Wart Contagion
Octomom Auxillary Heat Exchanger Repairman
walking the fine line line between genius and batshit fucking crazy

"computation is a pattern in the spacetime arrangement of particles, and it's not the particles but the pattern that really matters! Matter doesn't matter." -- Max Tegmark

Mangrove

CAIN!!! (Beware! The following link contains dangers levels of irony. View discretion is advised)

http://news.yahoo.com/catholic-church-wants-saviles-papal-honour-removed-114000751.html
What makes it so? Making it so is what makes it so.

P3nT4gR4m

QuoteFaced with growing public outrage at the allegations, the family decided to remove the headstone on Savile's grave and destroy it to avoid it becoming a target for vandals.

:facepalm:

I'm up to my arse in Brexit Numpties, but I want more.  Target-rich environments are the new sexy.
Not actually a meat product.
Ass-Kicking & Foot-Stomping Ancient Master of SHIT FUCK FUCK FUCK
Awful and Bent Behemothic Results of Last Night's Painful Squat.
High Altitude Haggis-Filled Sex Bucket From Beyond Time and Space.
Internet Monkey Person of Filthy and Immoral Pygmy-Porn Wart Contagion
Octomom Auxillary Heat Exchanger Repairman
walking the fine line line between genius and batshit fucking crazy

"computation is a pattern in the spacetime arrangement of particles, and it's not the particles but the pattern that really matters! Matter doesn't matter." -- Max Tegmark

Mangrove

Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on October 27, 2012, 10:59:57 PM
QuoteFaced with growing public outrage at the allegations, the family decided to remove the headstone on Savile's grave and destroy it to avoid it becoming a target for vandals.

:facepalm:

:lulz:

Given that Rupert Murdoch is also the recipient of a Papal gong, I am not sure it's worth the effort to remove the honor from Savile. Seems that being utterly corrupt is part of the approval process.
What makes it so? Making it so is what makes it so.

Cain

It's worth remembering that Britain's most influential Catholic of recent times has no titles in the religion at all.

I am, of course, referring to Tony Blair.

Cain

Police are questioning Gary Glitter.

Strangely, I was going to say something about Glitter, but since it was mostly facetious innuendo, I decided it wasn't worth it.  Clearly, this shows I should engage in such things ALL THE TIME just in case I'm right.

Mangrove

Quote from: Cain on October 28, 2012, 09:42:20 AM
Police are questioning Gary Glitter.

Strangely, I was going to say something about Glitter, but since it was mostly facetious innuendo, I decided it wasn't worth it.  Clearly, this shows I should engage in such things ALL THE TIME just in case I'm right.

Likewise. I'm thinking Jonathan King is next. And remember, every day is 'facetious innuendo day' when it comes to ridiculing Britain's most beloved perverts. Go for it!
What makes it so? Making it so is what makes it so.

Anna Mae Bollocks

Quote from: Pixie on October 23, 2012, 09:08:41 PM
Sir Jimmy Saville. basically, he covered his tracks by being all philanthropic and trading on his reputation, no one believed the victims whilst he was alive and the police were paid off.  The whole thing ties into a very rape-culture environment of flagrant abuse and sexual harassment from the 60's to the 80's at the Beeb.

The Beeb is funded by the taxpayer, now there will be a massive enquiry and Things Will Not Look Good for the BBC. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile_sexual_abuse_scandal

Even the almost sainted John Peel it turns out was having sex with 15 year olds. I'm so glad I never posted the letter I wrote at 10 to Jim'll Fix It.

When you said "the Beeb", my first thought was Justin Bieber.  :horrormirth:
I know, BBC...
Scantily-Clad Inspector of Gigantic and Unnecessary Cashews, Texas Division

Cain

You know, and I never thought I'd say this seriously, but David Icke has an interesting piece on Jimmy Savile and, in particular, his connections to the Royal Family.

Even if you only go by the verifiable statements from legitimate newspapers, it seems Savile was rather close to the Royals until a row with, of all people, Prince Philip.

If you can ignore the constant references to Hitler being a British secret agent, satanism and orgies, there does seem to be a case that Buckingham Palace might have something to worry about from a full investigation of Savile's crimes.

Mangrove

Quote from: Cain on October 29, 2012, 10:10:46 AM
You know, and I never thought I'd say this seriously, but David Icke has an interesting piece on Jimmy Savile and, in particular, his connections to the Royal Family.

Even if you only go by the verifiable statements from legitimate newspapers, it seems Savile was rather close to the Royals until a row with, of all people, Prince Philip.

If you can ignore the constant references to Hitler being a British secret agent, satanism and orgies, there does seem to be a case that Buckingham Palace might have something to worry about from a full investigation of Savile's crimes.

Alien lizard people aside, this isn't too far fetched. Famous people, especially famous people who are high profile in charitable activities tend to get noticed by the Royals and get invites.

The part I don't believe is anyone arguing or falling out with Prince Phillip. Totally implausible.  :wink:
What makes it so? Making it so is what makes it so.

Cain

It does make sense, and would explain the Met's reluctance to investigate even more than Thatcher.  Prime Ministers come and go, but the Crown endures.  There are a disturbing amount of people in both the police and the military (and lets not forget, lots of ex-military go into the police) who seem to think their job involves serving the Royal Family.