Unlimited "Guns, Fuck Yeah!" Thread

[Don Coyote]

Legislation that didn't do jack the first time, and will effect the class of weapons that are involved in a very small amount of total deaths caused by weapons simply so that it will pave the way to further restrict other classes of firearms is good in your eyes?

That legislation was shitty and full of holes and is an inadequate measuring stick.  Perhaps something with more teeth and less holes will work better.

So what would have more teeth?

[AFK]

Legislation that didn't do jack the first time, and will effect the class of weapons that are involved in a very small amount of total deaths caused by weapons simply so that it will pave the way to further restrict other classes of firearms is good in your eyes?

That legislation was shitty and full of holes and is an inadequate measuring stick.  Perhaps something with more teeth and less holes will work better.

So what would have more teeth?

For starters, in my opinion, it probably should include more weapons, what weapons are included should be based on crime data. Also, The sunset clause should be eliminated. 

[Elder Iptuous]

should it include more weapons by specifically naming them? (which i hope i shouldn't have to explain why that's retarded)
or should it include more weapons by feature?  if so, what feature?  weren't taking away the deadly barrel shrouds enough?!

[Don Coyote]

should it include more weapons by specifically naming them? (which i hope i shouldn't have to explain why that's retarded)
or should it include more weapons by feature?  if so, what feature?  weren't taking away the deadly barrel shrouds enough?!

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

My new dog is neurotic.  Seriously.

Ha! I actually caught one of mine sneaking upstairs to pee on the rug because she doesn't like to go outside when it's raining. Not even shitting you.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

No, fuck the Constitution on its own merits.

Hellooooooooo, Captain Utopia!

At least he finally said it flat-out. 

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Legislation that didn't do jack the first time, and will effect the class of weapons that are involved in a very small amount of total deaths caused by weapons simply so that it will pave the way to further restrict other classes of firearms is good in your eyes?

That legislation was shitty and full of holes and is an inadequate measuring stick.  Perhaps something with more teeth and less holes will work better.

So what would have more teeth?

For starters, in my opinion, it probably should include more weapons, what weapons are included should be based on crime data. Also, The sunset clause should be eliminated.

So, innocent peoples' rights should be curtailed based on the preferences of criminals.

First class police state you're designing in your head, there.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

No, fuck the Constitution on its own merits.

Hellooooooooo, Captain Utopia!

At least he finally said it flat-out. 

Well, it's not exactly a surprise, is it?

[Cain]

80 pages or bust.

[P3nT4gR4m]

Prohibition is definitely the way to go.

Thanks to alcohol prohibition Al Capone was starved of an opportunity to forge a criminal empire trading contraband hooch. I'm sure Chicago was thankful that things like the St Valentines massacre never happened, all because nasty booze was banned.

Thanks to drug prohibition the Sinaloa cartel never had the means to become a powerful, military force that ruins the lives of countless thousands of mexican farmers.

I'm sure gun prohibition will have exactly the same effect. Personally I'm rooting for it

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Prohibition is definitely the way to go.

Thanks to alcohol prohibition Al Capone was starved of an opportunity to forge a criminal empire trading contraband hooch. I'm sure Chicago was thankful that things like the St Valentines massacre never happened, all because nasty booze was banned.

Thanks to drug prohibition the Sinaloa cartel never had the means to become a powerful, military force that ruins the lives of countless thousands of mexican farmers.

I'm sure gun prohibition will have exactly the same effect. Personally I'm rooting for it

It's not about guns.  It's about control of people.  It's about knowing what's best for everyone.

Surely, P3nt, you want somebody watching out for your best interests, right?  Telling you what you can and cannot do, to keep you safe.

[tyrannosaurus vex]

I think we're looking at this all wrong. RWHN isn't here to break anything. He's the Token Liberal™. You know how in the 70s, all the sit-coms had a Token Black Guy whose purpose was to reinforce all the nasty and unfair stereotypes about black people? That's what RWHN is for liberals, on PD. He apparently wandered off the set of a Rush Limbaugh forum at some point, and forgot to drop the act.

[AFK]

I'm certainly not a Liberal. 

[AFK]

Legislation that didn't do jack the first time, and will effect the class of weapons that are involved in a very small amount of total deaths caused by weapons simply so that it will pave the way to further restrict other classes of firearms is good in your eyes?

That legislation was shitty and full of holes and is an inadequate measuring stick.  Perhaps something with more teeth and less holes will work better.

So what would have more teeth?

For starters, in my opinion, it probably should include more weapons, what weapons are included should be based on crime data. Also, The sunset clause should be eliminated.

So, innocent peoples' rights should be curtailed based on the preferences of criminals.

First class police state you're designing in your head, there.

I don't agree that it would be a curtailment of rights, as we have already discussed at length.