So, how would you abuse this law?

[Trivial]

Ky. legislature overrides 'religious freedom' veto

The legislation protects "sincerely held religious beliefs" from infringement unless there is "a compelling governmental interest."

I think the fun one would be to get gay married citing this law.  Sadly, I'm married already, not gay, and in Iowa.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

There's another thread on this somewhere. It certainly has potential for a Supreme Court overruling, but first you would have to be discriminated against.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Also, you would have to prove a "legitimate" religious basis for your marriage.

[Trivial]

Oh, missed the other thread.

[hirley0]

1St i would make an /-/
next an HoHe

[hirley0]

1St i would make an /-/
next an HoHe

\-\OHe's are something Like HiHo's only triangular

[Pergamos]

Oh, missed the other thread.

It was one of mine in Aneristic Delusions.  Roger put me in my place for suggesting the law might allow Rastafarians to smoke weed.  It's apparently entirely designed to allow Religious conservatives to discriminate against gays.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Oh, missed the other thread.

It was one of mine in Aneristic Delusions.  Roger put me in my place for suggesting the law might allow Rastafarians to smoke weed.  It's apparently entirely designed to allow Religious conservatives to discriminate against gays.

Yyyyeah you were also totally ignoring the difference between state and federal laws.

[Q. G. Pennyworth]

To answer the OP: registering as a Kopimist and pirating the shit out of everything.

[Bruno]

Just sit back and wait for Sharia Law.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Oh, missed the other thread.

It was one of mine in Aneristic Delusions.  Roger put me in my place for suggesting the law might allow Rastafarians to smoke weed.  It's apparently entirely designed to allow Religious conservatives to discriminate against gays.

No, it ALSO allows pharmacists to stop handing out those SLUT PILLS.

[navkat]

I think the Subgenii have already abused this nicely. They should set up a headquarters in Kay-Why.

[Roly Poly Oly-Garch]

This comes to mind...

http://naturistaction.org/StatesFrames/State_Laws_Frames/Kentucky_Laws/body_kentucky_laws.html

§510.148 Indecent exposure in the first degree.
(1) A person is guilty of indecent exposure in the first degree when he intentionally exposes his genitals under circumstances in which he knows or should know that his conduct is likely to cause affront or alarm to a person under the age of eighteen (18) years.

§510.150 Indecent exposure in the second degree.
(1) A person is guilty of indecent exposure in the second degree when he intentionally exposes his genitals under circumstances in which he knows or should know that his conduct is likely to cause affront or alarm to a person eighteen (18) years of age or older.

Oh look...Kentucky state law already defines a "nudist" within a religious context:

§232.010 Nudist defined.
As used in this chapter, "nudist" means any person who displays any part of his private person naked before persons of the opposite sex, not his husband or wife, at their solicitation or with their consent, for religious or health purposes...

[The Good Reverend Roger]

I think the Subgenii have already abused this nicely. They should set up a headquarters in Kay-Why.