I think this can be connected to what Harry G. Frankfurt was talking about in his essay, "On Bullshit" (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Bullshit )
Bullshit either can be true or can be false; hence, the bullshitter is a man or a woman whose principal aim — when uttering or publishing bullshit — is to impress the listener and the reader with words that communicate an impression that something is being or has been done, words that are neither true nor false, and so obscure the facts of the matter being discussed; i.e. “the bullshitter is faking things, but that does not necessarily mean he gets them wrong.”
Someone who is telling a lie, by contrast, knows the truth and is explicitly trying to convince the reader/listener of something untrue.
For a bullshitter, it isn't particularly important if their audience believes a truth or falsehood, so long as the bullshitter's goal is served. In the case of jargon, the listener ends up with neither the truth nor a falsehood, because nothing was actually communicated.