Call the cops, get evicted

[Nephew Twiddleton]

And why aren't the freemarketfags railing against this!?

This isn't 4chan.

You kind of have to allow young republicans a little slack while they learn how to communicate.

Sure. I'm instructing him. 

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Other traits common to Libertarians:

1.  They ALL started out DIRT FUCKING POOR.  Every one of the little darlings was raised in a cardboard box, and beaten every night in leiu of supper.

2.  They're ALL rich NOW, or at least on the way there.  Of course, an IP trace of any given Libertarian leads to a Starbucks restaurant near a university, but that's obviously because they own the Starbucks.  Alternatively, they are posting from someone's basement, probably their mother's, but that's because the man is keeping them down with health care and shit.

3.  They ALL value money more than (actual) freedom, other human beings, or even their own well-being.  It's a sort of degenerate religion.  Common religious terms include "productivity" (slavery), "entitlements" (poor people being allowed to eat), and "innovation" (their version of the Lord's prayer).

4.  They mostly hate women.  Not all of them hate women, but that's how you bet.  Why?  Because women A) are inexplicably not drawn into conversations when Libertarians very visibly read Atlas Shrugged at the coffee shop, and B) Women tend to be more interested in group survival than in horrible greedhead assbaggery.  Said greedhead assbaggery being the sum total of what Libertarians care about, when the rubber hits the road.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

It is in fact my position that Libertarians should be returned to their natural environment:  Somalia.

[Nephew Twiddleton]

Other traits common to Libertarians:

1.  They ALL started out DIRT FUCKING POOR.  Every one of the little darlings was raised in a cardboard box, and beaten every night in leiu of supper.

2.  They're ALL rich NOW, or at least on the way there.  Of course, an IP trace of any given Libertarian leads to a Starbucks restaurant near a university, but that's obviously because they own the Starbucks.  Alternatively, they are posting from someone's basement, probably their mother's, but that's because the man is keeping them down with health care and shit.

3.  They ALL value money more than (actual) freedom, other human beings, or even their own well-being.  It's a sort of degenerate religion.  Common religious terms include "productivity" (slavery), "entitlements" (poor people being allowed to eat), and "innovation" (their version of the Lord's prayer).

4.  They mostly hate women.  Not all of them hate women, but that's how you bet.  Why?  Because women A) are inexplicably not drawn into conversations when Libertarians very visibly read Atlas Shrugged at the coffee shop, and B) Women tend to be more interested in group survival than in horrible greedhead assbaggery.  Said greedhead assbaggery being the sum total of what Libertarians care about, when the rubber hits the road.

The value freedom so long as it's their freedom. They don't care if other people don't have their freedom.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

The value freedom so long as it's their freedom. They don't care if other people don't have their freedom.

No, actually, their own freedom comes secondary to money.  No shit.

[Nephew Twiddleton]

The value freedom so long as it's their freedom. They don't care if other people don't have their freedom.

No, actually, their own freedom comes secondary to money.  No shit.

Wow. So we can take their guns as long as they make enough money?

[Cardinal Pizza Deliverance.]

In today's world, freedom IS money. Money guarantees all those little luxuries like resort hotels for the 'planning meetings' and spas for the 'bonuses' and all the hookers one can blow. Just because all that money comes with certain . . . requirements . . . doesn't mean you're not free. It just means you're dedicated. Dedicated to showing how much better you are than your neighbors, hah-ha!

[The Good Reverend Roger]

The value freedom so long as it's their freedom. They don't care if other people don't have their freedom.

No, actually, their own freedom comes secondary to money.  No shit.

Wow. So we can take their guns as long as they make enough money?

No, guns are kind of sacred (somehow, this ties in with "keeping your money", though not one of them has the stones to actually stand up to the IRS).  But allowing banks and private prisons to arrange all of your society's social mores is just fine.  So are debtor's prisons, lack of due process, and lack of anything resembling control over your own body.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

In today's world, freedom IS money. Money guarantees all those little luxuries like resort hotels for the 'planning meetings' and spas for the 'bonuses' and all the hookers one can blow. Just because all that money comes with certain . . . requirements . . . doesn't mean you're not free. It just means you're dedicated. Dedicated to showing how much better you are than your neighbors, hah-ha!

Well, it's basically that in a shallow and corrupt nation, the highest aspiration anyone can seem to come up with is "get rich".

Because shrouds have pockets, doncha know.

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

The sheer incredible idiocy of the pre-rich crowd is mind-boggling. How anyone can look at America and think "I'm poor right now but I'm going to make it big someday" with absolutely no plan or basis for doing so is essentially a retard.

Even if they have a plan, they're fucking retarded. Most of the time the "plan" is this nebulous "I will work hard and be rewarded" concept that doesn't actually mean anything. Every once in a while the plan is the slightly more workable "I will go to business school and get an MBA and work in management for a corporation" which ends one of two ways for the common man with no family connections: way one is you're smart and have people skills so you work your way up through management and end up CEO of a small corporation with a salary less than $100k, way two is you're not that smart and you don't have much by way of people skills and you end up unemployed, or doing "small business consulting" which is a fancy way of saying that you're an out of work MBA.

Which scenario is more likely for our little pre-rich teabuddies? I'm gonna go with option 2, because anyone who thinks they're going to get rich with an MBA is obviously a fucking retard. What you're going to get is $200k in debt, and unemployed.

Pre-rich starts at about 5:00
I'M GOING FOR ACTRESSING

[Cain]

The value freedom so long as it's their freedom. They don't care if other people don't have their freedom.

No, actually, their own freedom comes secondary to money.  No shit.

Wow. So we can take their guns as long as they make enough money?

Citation:

So: not only is slavery in principle acceptable to a libertarian (propertarian), the slave remains, technically, completely at liberty, even at the moment he is killed with impunity by his master. (His master has no duty to transfer title to the market-acquired slave's life back to the disadvantaged slave.)

[The Good Reverend Roger]

The value freedom so long as it's their freedom. They don't care if other people don't have their freedom.

No, actually, their own freedom comes secondary to money.  No shit.

Wow. So we can take their guns as long as they make enough money?

Citation:

So: not only is slavery in principle acceptable to a libertarian (propertarian), the slave remains, technically, completely at liberty, even at the moment he is killed with impunity by his master. (His master has no duty to transfer title to the market-acquired slave's life back to the disadvantaged slave.)

Um, that article is nothing short of amazing.  Good find.

[Cain]

I know, right?  The abridged version of it that I sometimes use, "would it be permissible to sell yourself into slavery under a libertarian legal system?" tends to get me banned for trolling on libertarian blogs and communities.  But not before creating a massively entertaining row.

[von]

I know, right?  The abridged version of it that I sometimes use, "would it be permissible to sell yourself into slavery under a libertarian legal system?" tends to get me banned for trolling on libertarian blogs and communities.  But not before creating a massively entertaining row.

This position, like the "lol somalia" rebuttle, is something right-libertarians hear too much of -- it's one of the stereotypical "obvious troll" arguments.

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

I know, right?  The abridged version of it that I sometimes use, "would it be permissible to sell yourself into slavery under a libertarian legal system?" tends to get me banned for trolling on libertarian blogs and communities.  But not before creating a massively entertaining row.

This position, like the "lol somalia" rebuttle, is something right-libertarians hear too much of -- it's one of the stereotypical "obvious troll" arguments.

IOW, they're jujitsued into massive butthurt.