What did you do with my RWHN?

[AFK]

False equivalency.

It isn't journalism.  It's fucking sensationalism to move units.  It's jabbing a knife into open wounds.  It's pretty sick.

[AFK]

You can do a story on the asshat sack of shit, but putting that kind of picture on the cover is just unneccesary.  The clear message, wanna be a rock star and get on a magazine but you're a pathetic, cowardly piece of shit?

Blow up kids.

[AFK]

There's the Reader's Digest edition for you Pent. 

[Junkenstein]

False equivalency.

It isn't journalism.  It's fucking sensationalism to move units.  It's jabbing a knife into open wounds.  It's pretty sick.

Have you actually seen any mainstream media in the past say, 20 years?

I actually explained my outrage in this thread, so that is a rather silly question to ask.

Your "Outrage" is rather silly as you seem to be mainly upset at a photo that has already been widely used. This is not a rational position.

This whole thread is like getting pissed off at Fox for being "Fair and Balanced".

You can do a story on the asshat sack of shit, but putting that kind of picture on the cover is just unneccesary.  The clear message, wanna be a rock star and get on a magazine but you're a pathetic, cowardly piece of shit?

Blow up kids.

Once again, you're missing the point. You also seem to have totally ignored all the surrounding conversations on this topic regarding international terrorism and various interactions with numerous less than honourable organisations.


I'd swear your posts weren't always this retarded. Are you suffering withdrawal from drug threads?

[P3nT4gR4m]

There's the Reader's Digest edition for you Pent.

My Point























































... your dumb fucking head 

[Pope Pixie Pickle]

http://www.pressherald.com/news/Bomber-as-rock-star-Rolling-Stone-cover-draws-outrage.html?pagenum=1

"I can't think of another instance in which one has glamorized the image of an alleged terrorist. This is the image of a rock star. This is the image of someone who is admired, of someone who has a fan base, of someone we are critiquing as art," said Kathleen Hall Jamieson, a communications professor and the director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.

Yeah, Baader and Meinhof never got that treatment:





Nor did Leila Khaled:



Definitely not Che Guevara:



Or the depiction of Carlos Illich Rameriz Sanchez in the Olivier Assayas trilogy:



I don't know who is more retarded here, Kathleen Hall Jamieson for the original comment, or RWHN for blindly accepting it.

Bbbbbuuut, Che Guavera was a Freedom Fighter for Justice!

fredom fighter/terrorist. it's all in the narrative of the person's beliefs.

[Pope Pixie Pickle]

But CPD, you're a woman.  Ergo an idiot.

Dok,
Has noticed another trend.

Yeah, that one's a hard trend to miss.

the misogyny is strong in him since the ol marital breakdown.

I feel sorry for his daughter.


and what about musicians that glorify terrorists?

Ever heard of a kid named Tim Parry?  Or the kids that got kneecapped by paramilitaries last summer in Ulster?

[P3nT4gR4m]

But CPD, you're a woman.  Ergo an idiot.

Dok,
Has noticed another trend.

Yeah, that one's a hard trend to miss.

the misogyny is strong in him since the ol marital breakdown.

I feel sorry for his daughter.


and what about musicians that glorify teoorits?

Ever heard of a kid named Tim Parry?

They should be censorshipped, obviously. Likewise the ones who glorify drugs or irresponsible sexual practices or any form of thoughtcrime really. Y'know, in case the children

[Pope Pixie Pickle]

But CPD, you're a woman.  Ergo an idiot.

Dok,
Has noticed another trend.

Yeah, that one's a hard trend to miss.

the misogyny is strong in him since the ol marital breakdown.

I feel sorry for his daughter.


and what about musicians that glorify teoorits?

Ever heard of a kid named Tim Parry?

They should be censorshipped, obviously. Likewise the ones who glorify drugs or irresponsible sexual practices or any form of thoughtcrime really. Y'know, in case the children

I'm sayin he's gettin a hard on for the fuckin' dropkicks throwin their toys out of the pram.

LOL HYPOCRITE.

[Eater of Clowns]

They're trying to make him look like a rock star has been possibly the most aggravating parroted statement of this whole thing.

That's a photo of the kid. It's what he looked like. If it doesn't fit everyone's general idea of what a monster is supposed to look like then maybe that's a good assumption to challenge.

[P3nT4gR4m]

But CPD, you're a woman.  Ergo an idiot.

Dok,
Has noticed another trend.

Yeah, that one's a hard trend to miss.

the misogyny is strong in him since the ol marital breakdown.

I feel sorry for his daughter.


and what about musicians that glorify teoorits?

Ever heard of a kid named Tim Parry?

They should be censorshipped, obviously. Likewise the ones who glorify drugs or irresponsible sexual practices or any form of thoughtcrime really. Y'know, in case the children

I'm sayin he's gettin a hard on for the fuckin' dropkicks throwin their toys out of the pram.

LOL HYPOCRITE.

Heh. Hypocrisy is kind of part and parcel really. Protecting children by ruining their lives and all that. Stands to reason that anyone who supports any of his positions will be kind of a retarded asshole. Birds of a feather, as they say.

[AFK]

But CPD, you're a woman.  Ergo an idiot.

Dok,
Has noticed another trend.

Yeah, that one's a hard trend to miss.

the misogyny is strong in him since the ol marital breakdown.

I feel sorry for his daughter.

and what about musicians that glorify terrorists?

Ever heard of a kid named Tim Parry?  Or the kids that got kneecapped by paramilitaries last summer in Ulster?

No, I haven't.  I'm not a hardcore fan of the Murphys by any means.  I like a few of their songs, but my point in this thread is simply I agree with their published statement on the Rolling Stone cover.  I really don't have any considerable depth of knowledge of their politics. 

[Doktor Howl]

They're trying to make him look like a rock star has been possibly the most aggravating parroted statement of this whole thing.

That's a photo of the kid. It's what he looked like. If it doesn't fit everyone's general idea of what a monster is supposed to look like then maybe that's a good assumption to challenge.

See, you're thinking.  And thinking is BAD.  Your reactions have been carefully packaged for you, and you just run off and do whatever.  Look at RWHN.  HE at least has the DECENCY to use the opinions that he has been given.

[Doktor Howl]

10 pages in just a little over two hours, not bad.

CALLED IT.

[Doktor Howl]

10 pages in just a little over two hours, not bad.

Roger called it. 

Yes, yes I did.