What did you do with my RWHN?

[Left]

I just know the new him...
I seem to remember he was mad about something (though I'm forgetting what) so he kind of comes here and posts stuff he knows is going to aggravate us.

Has the political orientation of the board shifted progressive? or has RHWN shifted towards Fox-News territory?

I haven't been here long enough to know.

[Nephew Twiddleton]

I just know the new him...
I seem to remember he was mad about something (though I'm forgetting what) so he kind of comes here and posts stuff he knows is going to aggravate us.

Has the political orientation of the board shifted progressive? or has RHWN shifted towards Fox-News territory?

I haven't been here long enough to know.

Probably drugs. That is RWHN's Thermopylae.

I've been here... since. Well, probably 3 or 4 years. Not nearly as long as Dok or Nigel, or LMNO, or RWHN himself. We've always been progressive, at least in my memory. This is a shift, or so it would seem to me, on RWHN's part.

I mean, I feel bad for the guy in some ways, happy for him in others, and as I said upthread, deeply disappointed.

He either sustained a pretty bad head injury or he's trolling us for some unknown reason (as he hints at, FREQUENTLY, but I'm not sure if that's legit or to make him look less like a brain damaged seagull (totally stealing that btw)), or as Alty suggested, a wee bit of the midlife. Either way, I hope that he shakes it off.

All I know, is that LMNO said that he has to quit RWHN. LMNO is a patient man. Probably more so than me. So, if LMNO can keep his composure while saying "later dude" and that LMNO has been in contact with RWHN for longer than I have with either of them, says a lot to me.

[Nephew Twiddleton]

When it all comes down to it, RWHN has been Thermopylaeing a lot over the past, I dunno, year. It wasn't always like this. I remember the days when it was his puns that irritated me (I hate extended puns. Get your quip an move on, is my take on it). I'm resisting not liking the guy, but this thread has kinda made that difficult, especially in the implications that the value of a human life is mutable. It's not mutable. I'm usually a moral relativist, but this is one thing I stand firm on. It is only acceptable to end a human life if it is an immediate necessity to preserve that of your own or another's. And even then, you should feel like a shitstain, because that is a normal reaction.

[East Coast Hustle]

Did he look like this?

Because that's how I see him in my minds eye.

Less Ariel, more Squidward.

[AFK]

I just know the new him...
I seem to remember he was mad about something (though I'm forgetting what) so he kind of comes here and posts stuff he knows is going to aggravate us.

Has the political orientation of the board shifted progressive? or has RHWN shifted towards Fox-News territory?

I haven't been here long enough to know.

There is no "new" or "old", there just....is.

[Nephew Twiddleton]

Aaaaaaand we can throw denial on there too.

[AFK]

Denial of what?  Anyone who's been paying attention would know that I am to the right of many here on certain issues.  I'm certainly liberal socially and more or less liberal economically.  But I am hawkish when it comes to public safety and public health, but that isnt new.  So there is nothing to deny.

[Nephew Twiddleton]

Denial that there is a new you and an old you. This has nothing to do with your views on public health but rather your personality and how you interact with us. To say that youre the same guy that you were when i joined isnt true. It seems to of that that is also the general consensus.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

It isn't he who has changed, it's everybody else! Can't you see, Twid?

[Cain]

[Nephew Twiddleton]

Indeed. Perhaps your right nigel. Maybe it really is just all of us that decided that rwhn would interact with us differently. Personally im looking forward to using my nifty new mindlaser

[Cain]

[Nephew Twiddleton]

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

It's different when the New York Times does it, though; THAT'S journalism. It's sensationalism when Rolling Stone does it.

Right?

[Nephew Twiddleton]

It's different when the New York Times does it, though; THAT'S journalism. It's sensationalism when Rolling Stone does it.

Right?

Also note the date.