Author Topic: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.  (Read 97546 times)

Nephew Twiddleton

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 20460
  • DEATH METAL ENGLISH
    • View Profile
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #915 on: August 20, 2013, 04:37:33 am »
No, science explains why marijuana addiction is a problem.

The general understanding of the scientific consensus on marijuana (at least by the people here)

I see, so PD.COM = science now eh?  I wonder how many points one would lose on a paper if they actually tried to cite this source in a research paper.

My point was more that the people involved in this conversation have a certain understanding of the scienctific consensus.  And that you have completely failed to produce any convincing arguements to the contrary, partly due to your attitude toward actual evidence.

The main problem is is that he is unwilling to objectively evaluate contrary data, which I think is what originally caused the bad blood between him and Nigel. Nigel's got the right of it, scientifically. Some data disagree with other data, and usually, for a scientist, that indicates that something else needs to be looked into to reconcile those two points. RWHN is only interested in acknowledging data that fits in with his assumptions, and also sometimes data that actually conflicts with it but he ended up misinterpreting. But again, we all know his propensity for misinterpreting.
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

AFK

  • We all
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 33703
    • View Profile
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #916 on: August 20, 2013, 04:39:39 am »
No, science explains why marijuana addiction is a problem.

The general understanding of the scientific consensus on marijuana (at least by the people here)

I see, so PD.COM = science now eh?  I wonder how many points one would lose on a paper if they actually tried to cite this source in a research paper.

My point was more that the people involved in this conversation have a certain understanding of the scienctific consensus.  And that you have completely failed to produce any convincing arguements to the contrary, partly due to your attitude toward actual evidence.

No, I've provided a lot of cited and researched evidence across the drug threads.  They are summarily ignored.
Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

Nephew Twiddleton

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 20460
  • DEATH METAL ENGLISH
    • View Profile
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #917 on: August 20, 2013, 04:40:48 am »
No, science explains why marijuana addiction is a problem.

The general understanding of the scientific consensus on marijuana (at least by the people here)

I see, so PD.COM = science now eh?  I wonder how many points one would lose on a paper if they actually tried to cite this source in a research paper.

My point was more that the people involved in this conversation have a certain understanding of the scienctific consensus.  And that you have completely failed to produce any convincing arguements to the contrary, partly due to your attitude toward actual evidence.

No, I've provided a lot of cited and researched evidence across the drug threads.  They are summarily ignored.

And why wouldn't they be? You describe all conflicting data as biased and agenda driven.
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

AFK

  • We all
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 33703
    • View Profile
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #918 on: August 20, 2013, 04:42:37 am »
"Oh well, then, stop"

Or keep dancing.  Fine with me either way.
Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

Nephew Twiddleton

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 20460
  • DEATH METAL ENGLISH
    • View Profile
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #919 on: August 20, 2013, 04:43:57 am »
"Oh well, then, stop"

Or keep dancing.  Fine with me either way.

You watch that video yet, "Assface"?
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

AFK

  • We all
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 33703
    • View Profile
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #920 on: August 20, 2013, 04:45:07 am »
Nope. 
Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

Nephew Twiddleton

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 20460
  • DEATH METAL ENGLISH
    • View Profile
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #921 on: August 20, 2013, 04:45:42 am »
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

Nephew Twiddleton

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 20460
  • DEATH METAL ENGLISH
    • View Profile
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #922 on: August 20, 2013, 04:46:52 am »
You might regain a modicum of my previous respect for you if you did. Even if you did brush it off as another shill.
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

AFK

  • We all
  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 33703
    • View Profile
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #923 on: August 20, 2013, 04:55:07 am »
Uh, yeah, I'll get right on that.
Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

Nephew Twiddleton

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 20460
  • DEATH METAL ENGLISH
    • View Profile
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #924 on: August 20, 2013, 04:57:55 am »
Uh, yeah, I'll get right on that.

My, how far we've come in less than two months.

I dont want another drug thread. This is a thread about appreciating rwhn. So lets find stuff to actually appreciate about him rather than the weird spot hes gone through with his family life and him turning into what seems to be a guy who we mainly know for his job. What was that comic in the end of the bip again?

Right. So rev- i dont believe ive ever heard any of your music. Before my joining. Got a song or two to share?
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

The Good Reverend Roger

  • Horrible Bastard
  • One-Armed Jizz Moppers
  • Deserved It
  • **
  • Posts: 90457
    • View Profile
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #925 on: August 20, 2013, 05:09:02 am »
Hey, while everyone was getting forced handjobs1 from RWHN, the British government ran into the Guardian's offices about 4 hours ago and smashed the computers containing the Snowden stuff.

(See prism thread).

Nothing important.  Carry on.






1  Too many of those can kill you.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

 "Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Nephew Twiddleton

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 20460
  • DEATH METAL ENGLISH
    • View Profile
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #926 on: August 20, 2013, 05:10:02 am »
Hey, while everyone was getting forced handjobs1 from RWHN, the British government ran into the Guardian's offices about 4 hours ago and smashed the computers containing the Snowden stuff.

(See prism thread).

Nothing important.  Carry on.






1  Too many of those can kill you.

Whoa, fucking, seriously?
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

The Good Reverend Roger

  • Horrible Bastard
  • One-Armed Jizz Moppers
  • Deserved It
  • **
  • Posts: 90457
    • View Profile
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #927 on: August 20, 2013, 05:10:39 am »
Hey, while everyone was getting forced handjobs1 from RWHN, the British government ran into the Guardian's offices about 4 hours ago and smashed the computers containing the Snowden stuff.

(See prism thread).

Nothing important.  Carry on.






1  Too many of those can kill you.

Whoa, fucking, seriously?

See prism thread.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

 "Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Nephew Twiddleton

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 20460
  • DEATH METAL ENGLISH
    • View Profile
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #928 on: August 20, 2013, 05:15:30 am »
Hey, while everyone was getting forced handjobs1 from RWHN, the British government ran into the Guardian's offices about 4 hours ago and smashed the computers containing the Snowden stuff.

(See prism thread).

Nothing important.  Carry on.






1  Too many of those can kill you.

Whoa, fucking, seriously?

See prism thread.

I just did. I'm speechless, but at the same time unsurprised.
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

Triple Zero

  • DO NOT ABUSE EXCEPT FOR URGENT FURNITURE MOVING EMERGENCIES
  • One-Armed Jizz Moppers
  • Deserved It
  • **
  • Posts: 25403
  • Horrible and Sexy Queen of Cheese
    • View Profile
    • Random BIP
Re: How We Protect At-Risk Kids.
« Reply #929 on: August 20, 2013, 12:37:51 pm »
Hey, while everyone was getting forced handjobs1 from RWHN, the British government ran into the Guardian's offices about 4 hours ago and smashed the computers containing the Snowden stuff.

(See prism thread).

Nothing important.  Carry on.

The actual smashing occured 2 months ago, they decided to break the story last night/this morning/just then.

It's still very jaw-meet-floor, regardless.
Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.